January 15, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said: Worth it for the risk of Butler picking up that option. I'd not buy ben out. He would help the tank. Doesn't matter nets are looking to get money off the books so they can rebuild not add guys like PG
January 15, 20251 yr 6 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said: Doesn't matter nets are looking to get money off the books so they can rebuild not add guys like PG Way to kill our dreams in here. Imagine the team sticking this bad and having Simmons back to Boo every night
January 15, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, Bwestbrook36 said: Doesn't matter nets are looking to get money off the books so they can rebuild not add guys like PG I'm not saying the Nets would take PG.... I'm saying a 3rd team would take PG. We would take Simmons and picks. Picks and players on expiring deals would go to NJ
January 15, 20251 yr 5 minutes ago, iladelphxx said: I'm not saying the Nets would take PG.... I'm saying a 3rd team would take PG. We would take Simmons and picks. Picks and players on expiring deals would go to NJ Not sure who would even want PG at this point with that contract.
January 16, 20251 yr Maxey is gonna look a lot better next year when we have McCain who can be the distributor.
January 16, 20251 yr 6 hours ago, Bwestbrook36 said: Not sure who would even want PG at this point with that contract. Idk the warriors wanted him this offseason but the clippers didn’t do it. Unlikely but maybe they’d still be interested if you could make it work. This works but still don’t see it happening and would be stuck with Wiggins for at least one more years til He’s an expiring contract
January 16, 20251 yr 11 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: Idk the warriors wanted him this offseason but the clippers didn’t do it. Unlikely but maybe they’d still be interested if you could make it work. This works but still don’t see it happening and would be stuck with Wiggins for at least one more years til He’s an expiring contract Yeah if im the warriors i want no parts of that.
January 16, 20251 yr 6 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said: Yeah if im the warriors i want no parts of that. Warriors are 20-20 on the year. Frankly they aren’t going anywhere with their current roster. If they are still interested in PG like they were in the summer this is likely more realistic. If the warriors do it, i think it’s likely cause Steph and Draymond want it
January 16, 20251 yr 1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: Warriors are 20-20 on the year. Frankly they aren’t going anywhere with their current roster. If they are still interested in PG like they were in the summer this is likely more realistic. If the warriors do it, i think it’s likely cause Steph and Draymond want it I mean they can have them and be old as F and be way worse no problems here lol
January 16, 20251 yr 1 minute ago, Bwestbrook36 said: I mean they can have them and be old as F and be way worse no problems here lol Tbh i actually think PG playing alongside curry is likely better for Pg as Embiid seems to be taking a sabbatical this year. The issue is will he, Draymond and curry actually make it through a season and if GS would still want him like they did this offseason.
January 16, 20251 yr 6 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: Warriors are 20-20 on the year. Frankly they aren’t going anywhere with their current roster. If they are still interested in PG like they were in the summer this is likely more realistic. If the warriors do it, i think it’s likely cause Steph and Draymond want it Take Wiggins out of it. Send those guys to Brooklyn. Brooklyn send Simmons here. LA gets Geothe. And Brooklyn gets expiring. We get Simmons expiring to get out of the gerome contract.
January 16, 20251 yr 1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said: Take Wiggins out of it. Send those guys to Brooklyn. Brooklyn send Simmons here. LA gets Geothe. And Brooklyn gets expiring. We get Simmons expiring to get out of the gerome contract. Based on trying to do it on the trade machine the warriors can only take on Paul George if Wiggins gets shipped out somewhere
January 16, 20251 yr Justin Edwards can play! He will be a major bench contributor next year. Untouchables: Maxey McCain Council (super cheap contract) Edwards Everyone else is available.
January 16, 20251 yr 41 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: Based on trying to do it on the trade machine the warriors can only take on Paul George if Wiggins gets shipped out somewhere oh man I didnt consider them. I was just thinking about Brooklyn getting those expirings.
January 16, 20251 yr Author 1 hour ago, Khani1 said: Justin Edwards can play! He will be a major bench contributor next year. Untouchables: Maxey McCain Council (super cheap contract) Edwards Everyone else is available. they can all go. maxey is overrated as hell. he's an inefficient, small sg who can't play pg.
January 16, 20251 yr 2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: they can all go. maxey is overrated as hell. he's an inefficient, small sg who can't play pg. Maxey will look a lot better when McCain runs the point.
January 16, 20251 yr Author 8 minutes ago, Khani1 said: Maxey will look a lot better when McCain runs the point. maybe...but mccain isn't a true pg either.
January 16, 20251 yr 2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: maybe...but mccain isn't a true pg either. Yeah. I dont agree on Maxey being over-rated. But we sure can say that this season so far has been a disappointment for him. To your point about the true PG, I think the NBA has gone away from that. Looking at the past 5 NBA champions, you have Boston. Their strength is not at the PG position. Denver, Jamal Murray not really a true PG. Warriors of course have Steph so theres a PG. Bucks are not lead by a PG, and the Lakers, not lead by a PG. The great passing PG era is pretty long in the past now. Think about the early 2000s where we had Nash, Kidd, prime Chris Paul, Billups, Rondo, Jason Williams, Daron Williams, Baron Davis, Westbrook. A few of those guys are still hanging on, super old. But the PG position as a whole is not like that anymore because team basketball is not being played. Its all ISOs and pick and rolls. No ball movement with structured offenses.
January 16, 20251 yr 10 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: Warriors are 20-20 on the year. Frankly they aren’t going anywhere with their current roster. If they are still interested in PG like they were in the summer this is likely more realistic. If the warriors do it, i think it’s likely cause Steph and Draymond want it Soooooooo no
January 16, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said: Yeah. I dont agree on Maxey being over-rated. But we sure can say that this season so far has been a disappointment for him. To your point about the true PG, I think the NBA has gone away from that. Looking at the past 5 NBA champions, you have Boston. Their strength is not at the PG position. Denver, Jamal Murray not really a true PG. Warriors of course have Steph so theres a PG. Bucks are not lead by a PG, and the Lakers, not lead by a PG. The great passing PG era is pretty long in the past now. Think about the early 2000s where we had Nash, Kidd, prime Chris Paul, Billups, Rondo, Jason Williams, Daron Williams, Baron Davis, Westbrook. A few of those guys are still hanging on, super old. But the PG position as a whole is not like that anymore because team basketball is not being played. Its all ISOs and pick and rolls. No ball movement with structured offenses. Good watch on Memphis running a different style of offense and it's all free flowing
January 16, 20251 yr 2 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said: Soooooooo no I would agree with you after hearing him say that. But If that’s the case, then why the hell were they trying to get pg in a sign and trade during the offseason? They were still gonna have to pay him something significant just not a max.
January 16, 20251 yr 12 hours ago, DaEagles4Life said: The franchise player only shows up for work a quarter of the time; why should the fans be expected to be more committed?
January 16, 20251 yr 38 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: I would agree with you after hearing him say that. But If that’s the case, then why the hell were they trying to get pg in a sign and trade during the offseason? They were still gonna have to pay him something significant just not a max. They got to watch him this year be a pile of crap lol
January 16, 20251 yr Author 3 hours ago, HazletonEagle said: Yeah. I dont agree on Maxey being over-rated. But we sure can say that this season so far has been a disappointment for him. To your point about the true PG, I think the NBA has gone away from that. Looking at the past 5 NBA champions, you have Boston. Their strength is not at the PG position. Denver, Jamal Murray not really a true PG. Warriors of course have Steph so theres a PG. Bucks are not lead by a PG, and the Lakers, not lead by a PG. The great passing PG era is pretty long in the past now. Think about the early 2000s where we had Nash, Kidd, prime Chris Paul, Billups, Rondo, Jason Williams, Daron Williams, Baron Davis, Westbrook. A few of those guys are still hanging on, super old. But the PG position as a whole is not like that anymore because team basketball is not being played. Its all ISOs and pick and rolls. No ball movement with structured offenses. yeah...i'm not even talking about old school, pass-first pg's like that. i'm talking about guys who can create open looks & easy shots for their teammates. look at denver...it doesn't even have to be a pg. anyway, maxey doesn't do that. whether mccain can remains to be seen.
Create an account or sign in to comment