7 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Why would it be a 9:30AM Super Bowl?   You do realize that the NFL schedules the game for 9:30 AM in London to maximize viewership for that game without having it compete with the other games on Sunday, right?  

A 1PM Super Bowl (on the East Coast) would be a 6PM kickoff in London... easily doable.   As would 3:30 PM Super Bowl on the East Coast, as a 8:30 PM kickoff in London.   

 

9:30 AM Super Bowl.   .   Yeah, the NFL is going to play the Super Bowl such that the West Coast time is 6:30 AM!   And its 4:30 AM in Hawaii!!!

 

 

You're such a toolbag.  

10 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Why would it be a 9:30AM Super Bowl?   You do realize that the NFL schedules the game for 9:30 AM in London to maximize viewership for that game without having it compete with the other games on Sunday, right?  

A 1PM Super Bowl (on the East Coast) would be a 6PM kickoff in London... easily doable.   As would 3:30 PM Super Bowl on the East Coast, as a 8:30 PM kickoff in London.   

 

9:30 AM Super Bowl.   .   Yeah, the NFL is going to play the Super Bowl such that the West Coast time is 6:30 AM!   And its 4:30 AM in Hawaii!!!

 

You realize you're laughing at a 9:30am Super Bowl but the 1pm SB you said was doable would be 10am on the West Coast.  There is no way they'd do that. 8:30 kickoff would be 12:30pm Sunday on the West Coast. Possibly doable but seems risky for a SB

1 minute ago, pgcd3 said:

You realize you're laughing at a 9:30am Super Bowl but the 1pm SB you said was doable would be 10am on the West Coast.  There is no way they'd do that. 8:30 kickoff would be 12:30pm Sunday on the West Coast. Possibly doable but seems risky for a SB

Super Bowls used to be at 2pm, 3pm and 4pm EST.

Just now, pgcd3 said:

You realize you're laughing at a 9:30am Super Bowl but the 1pm SB you said was doable would be 10am on the West Coast.  There is no way they'd do that. 8:30 kickoff would be 12:30pm Sunday on the West Coast. Possibly doable but seems risky for a SB

I said doable, not probable.  The NFL will do whatever they think will maximize the money.  1PM isn't going to do that, but its at least an option.  3:30 PM would be my preference actually.  I don't like the current start time as it is.   But... the NFL likely thinks that 12:30 PM on the West Coast is still too early.

 

 

All that said, if London makes a crazy offer to host the Super Bowl... I have no doubt that NFL will look very long and hard at how to make it possible.   The bigger issue with a London Super Bowl is the weather in Feb in London.  Not exactly a 'warm weather' site.  If they put in a dome... that investigation will get more intense.

33 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Time alone will make that not work.

I’m OK with a 4pm EST start - but can the UK handle a 9pm and the WC a 1pm.

Anyone still think Tannehill is good??

 

they should start playing Levis

Just now, ToastJenkins said:

Anyone still think Tannehill is good??

 

they should start playing Levis

No but whoever the dope OC is should be slapped. Your best player is your RB … let him touch the ball. 

Boooooooo

1 minute ago, RLC said:

Boooooooo

Clearly he wanted everyone to know he's in the game.

The new LT just got a false start

That was a nasty shot. Hope 11 is okay.

Tannehill with the hospital ball.   Targeting by Hamilton.

36 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

When was the last time you went to a small school to watch them play, or tuned in to a small school matchup?  

 

Regarding draft time, you focus only on the individual matchup... nothing more and see how they respond.  Lots of small school players get discovered in these types of games.

I mean I'm not a scout or evaluator but I'm sure there are some that go to these smaller school games if there is an O-lineman or RB or LB that stands out as having NFL potential.  How often do some of these players stand out in the games where they're playing a Georgia, Bama, Michigan, etc when they're getting their butts kicked?  When you're getting destroyed by 50 there probably isn't much good tape on you.

Regardless,  you like these type of games.  I don't.  Neither of us are going to change our minds.  

Vicious hit.

Yeah... not surprising.  He clearly led with the crown of his helmet.  No effort to use his shoulder.

Just now, 315Eagles said:

I mean I'm not a scout or evaluator but I'm sure there are some that go to these smaller school games if there is an O-lineman or RB or LB that stands out as having NFL potential.  How often do some of these players stand out in the games where they're playing a Georgia, Bama, Michigan, etc when they're getting their butts kicked?  When you're getting destroyed by 50 there probably isn't much good tape on you.

Regardless,  you like these type of games.  I don't.  Neither of us are going to change our minds.  

I don't like them.  I see value in them.  There's a difference.

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

Yeah... not surprising.  He clearly led with the crown of his helmet.  No effort to use his shoulder.

Dirty.

Jordan Davis > Kyle Hamilton (a safety who can't cover)

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

I don't like them.  I see value in them.  There's a difference.

That's fair.  

Jeez… they decided to let their best player participate and good things happen. Imagine that. 

Just now, Casey @ Bat said:

Jeez… they decided to let their best player participate and good things happen. Imagine that. 

Who is this Henry guy?  He seems kind of good.

Every time I watch Jackson play, I come away unimpressed.  I just don't get it with him.  Maybe I just watch the wrong games of his.

14 minutes ago, Casey @ Bat said:

No but whoever the dope OC is should be slapped. Your best player is your RB … let him touch the ball. 

Also reinforces how dumb they were to trade us AJ

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

Every time I watch Jackson play, I come away unimpressed.  I just don't get it with him.  Maybe I just watch the wrong games of his.

Nah he is wildly overrated

Just now, ToastJenkins said:

Also reinforces how dumb they were to trade us AJ

They can be dumb if it helps us, all in favor of that.