2 minutes ago, Eagz said:

Lions or Bills as SB champs?

I'd readily take either, maybe slightly preferring Detroit...

Even if they win next week, they'd have to get past the Baltimore Bully Birds.

21 minutes ago, justwinbaby said:

I really can't tell if you're this clueless or if you're just a troll. It's very strange.

You don't think he's regressed?

4 minutes ago, Eagz said:

Lions or Bills as SB champs?

I'd readily take either, maybe slightly preferring Detroit...

Bills have to win tonight 

3 minutes ago, Eagz said:

Lions or Bills as SB champs?

I'd readily take either, maybe slightly preferring Detroit...

I’d like to see Bills. They have had probably worse playoff history luck than Detroit when you think about it. Detroit reminds me of the 2001 Eagles. They are the new kids on the block and should have more chances the next few years. 

1 minute ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Bills have to win tonight 

Got a good feeling about it.

I think Bills - Ravens in the AFCCG is as exciting as it gets.

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/other-potential-suitors-are-lurking-for-bill-belichick

Quote

Per a league source with knowledge of the situation, multiple teams are quietly considering a potential run at Belichick. At least one currently has a head-coaching vacancy. At least one currently does not.

 

 

 

Mike evans been a beast for a minute now...

22 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

you might just be very biased.

I'm not. I know Hurts didn't play as well as he did last year. I also know how good he has shown to be. You hate the dude. There's a difference in giving criticism and I have even said he deserves it this year. You don't criticize you go to the extreme. You couldn't get rid of him fast enough. You are who is very biased and it's strange you seem to not even see it. 

1 minute ago, Eagz said:

Got a good feeling about it.

I think Bills - Ravens in the AFCCG is as exciting as it gets.

I got the Chiefs, Bills injuries are a lot 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

I’d like to see Bills. They have had probably worse playoff history luck than Detroit when you think about it. Detroit reminds me of the 2001 Eagles. They are the new kids on the block and should have more chances the next few years. 

For mcdermott’s sake i hope they win. Cause losing back to back years at home in the divisional round is not good. Especially this year where the chiefs are not nearly as good as they’ve been in the past. To me this is the time to breakthrough. If you lose back to back years at home in the divisional round I’m not sure how you have the confidence that they are eventually going to breakthrough. 

 

WTF did they go for 2?

So stupid

Btw, the bold function is broken. Just want to notify @VaBeach_Eagleabout it. The other buttons work, but using bold doesn't do anything.

Mike Evans has been a beast this game

Just now, kiwieagle said:

WTF did they go for 2?

Bad bad call

Just now, kiwieagle said:

WTF did they go for 2?

The exact question I was coming in to ask. Idiotic. Now they can't tie it up without a 2 point conversion.

Just now, kiwieagle said:

WTF did they go for 2?

Analytics says going for 2 is the right call after scoring a TD when down 14.   Just didn’t execute.

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

For mcdermott’s sake i hope they win. Cause losing back to back years at home in the divisional round is not good. Especially this year where the chiefs are not nearly as good as they’ve been in the past. To me this is the time to breakthrough. If you lose back to back years at home in the divisional round I’m not sure how you have the confidence that they are eventually going to breakthrough. 

 

The Bills have to win today.  They just have to.

Analytics are stupid

1 minute ago, Sack that QB said:

Btw, the bold function is broken. Just want to notify @VaBeach_Eagleabout it. The other buttons work, but using bold doesn't do anything.

You're in Dark Mode, right? It's working, it's just difficult to distinguish because the background is dark. I've tried a few things to adjust that but it just isn't really noticeable like it is on the light background. 

I'll work some more on it when I can. 

1 minute ago, Arsenal79 said:

Analytics says going for 2 is the right call after scoring a TD when down 14.   Just didn’t execute.

I guess, chances for converting the 2 is more than 50% so you are either winning or still tying as long as you convert once.

Chris Collinsworth is correct that going for 2 is the right move!

Just now, VaBeach_Eagle said:

You're in Dark Mode, right? It's working, it's just difficult to distinguish because the background is dark. I've tried a few things to adjust that but it just isn't really noticeable like it is on the light background. 

I'll work some more on it when I can. 

Nope, light mode. I've tried on two separate browsers and mobile device. When I use bold it doesn't bold the text on either. But the other ones work just fine. Just to show I'm bolding the word nope in this post.

7 minutes ago, kiwieagle said:

I guess, chances for converting the 2 is more than 50% so you are either winning or still tying as long as you convert once.

Right.  Basically 50% chance to win, 25% chance to tie, and 25% chance to lose.