15 minutes ago, mattwill said:

That is what the OTAs and TC and PS are for. These aren’t high school coaches and players. They are professionals. Further, you are making an assumption that Moore’s preexisting terminology wasn’t being used. None of us know whether that was the case or not.

I didn’t assume that. Never considered that was occurring at all…until it was stated from them.

16 minutes ago, mattwill said:

That is what the OTAs and TC and PS are for. These aren’t high school coaches and players. They are professionals. Further, you are making an assumption that Moore’s preexisting terminology wasn’t being used. None of us know whether that was the case or not.

Exactly was stated keeping the plays that were good and have worked. Keeping our terminology because it will be easier on all these players been using it already for years.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I didn’t assume that. Never considered that was occurring at all…until it was stated from them.

But I get very few consume as much Eagles content as I do. Totally understandable.

18 minutes ago, mattwill said:

That is your assumption and your opinion. You have every right to those. I happen to wholeheartedly disagree.

You actually in past discussions have made the argument that that the games before the Bye were both sufficient and meaningful enough to warrant Sirianni being fired.

Which is it? Are the first 4 games important or a honeymoon?

The fifth game…tied in with 2023 collapse…for sure. Collapse alone IMO…so any additional games was icing

32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Totally shaky. It was weird. Unforced errors and indecisive. Don’t want to take anything away from our victory…but Mahomes was real shaky and off. Just undeniably so. Legacy destroying levels.

The video below has the game replay. Please watch it and tell me where there were unforced errors by Mahomes. I watched the first two Chiefs possessions and there are NO unforced errors in either one.

I will be very interested to hear what you feel were unforced errors. Looking forward to your response.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

The fifth game…tied in with 2023 collapse…for sure. Collapse alone IMO…so any additional games was icing

Some early coaching choices by Siri were just bad too. So…yeah I dont see a HC making decisions as equal to a learning curve time needed for players to master a new O. Not equal

48 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

One with so many missing and injured isn’t defining of what the starters could do

One equals one. There is no other reality where one equals any other number.

47 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

One equal game plus one equal game firming 50 percent of you define our entire 2024 O season. First game in Brazil and Bucs game so shorthanded. The two least relevant defining games of our entire season IMO…so differing.

You need to look at the NFL standings instead of practicing mental mastery-bation. Each game is equal in value. One always equals one. You learned that in First Grade.

46 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Guess anybody trying to say AR so terrible

No one said AR was terrible. What was said is that AR is high risk.

46 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just need about any other approach than coming after how poor AR is as the reasoning. Like almost anything else would be an Improvement.

No one said AR is poor. What was said is that AR is high risk.

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

You need to look at the NFL standings instead of practicing mental ****ion. Each game is equal in value. One always equals one. You learned that in First Grade.

Sure the game without Smitty, AJ and Lane defines our passing O with those starters? Some how this actually makes any sense to you?

31 minutes ago, mattwill said:

That is what the OTAs and TC and PS are for. These aren’t high school coaches and players. They are professionals. Further, you are making an assumption that Moore’s preexisting terminology wasn’t being used. None of us know whether that was the case or not.

It takes years of elite players to master an O. That’s my take on it. Not expecting it to happen in a single TC by any stretch.

42 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Oh…so now all games aren’t equal then..at all

Again your abysmal mathematics skills bite you. Add 0 and 1 from a loss and you get a total of 1. Add 1 and 0 from a win and you get a total of 1. The result of every single game gives you a total of 1. They are all equal in value.

33 minutes ago, mattwill said:

That is what the OTAs and TC and PS are for. These aren’t high school coaches and players. They are professionals. Further, you are making an assumption that Moore’s preexisting terminology wasn’t being used. None of us know whether that was the case or not.

Terminology isn’t even the biggest factor either way. Tough to be perfect at new terminology first game…even if going by your take. Terminology isn’t the difference making factor involved though. Lesser of many other greater factors involved.

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

How many players get over 30 touches with that production? Ever!!!

Then why are you assessing Saquon’s performance only on the basis of his runs (not even his touches)?

22 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This is what you stated was my opinion. Straight up wrong. Inaccurate and false.

Okay, if you aren’t advocating for that what are you advocating for?

Our whole O in 2024 was now finally running a pro O. Every player needing to read things and adjust. All on the same page doing that. QB first time calling the protection at the line. QB having the audible power. Coming from such a large gap being lowest utilizing motion…to consistently running motion.

21 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I didn’t assume that. Never considered that was occurring at all…until it was stated from them.

Never was stated by them. Your imagination is playing tricks on you.

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sure the game without Smitty, AJ and Lane defines our passing O with those starters? Some how this actually makes any sense to you?

Let’s make this easy for you because you clearly don’t know how to count.

At the end of the game how many wins did the Eagles put in the Win column of the NFL Standings? And how many losses in the Losses column? And when you add those two numbers what do you get?

I’m off to do some gardening. It’s been (un)real.

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Let’s make this easy for you because you clearly don’t know how to count.

At the end of the game how many wins did the Eagles put in the Win column of the NFL Standings? And how many losses in the Losses column? And when you add those two numbers what do you get?

You get least seeing game for our O…in my opinion anyway. Obviously you feel it’s worth a quarter deciding to define our entire 2024 O season. I place it as least relevant game defining our 2024 O.

3 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Let’s make this easy for you because you clearly don’t know how to count.

At the end of the game how many wins did the Eagles put in the Win column of the NFL Standings? And how many losses in the Losses column? And when you add those two numbers what do you get?

Never were talking about was a loss a loss. Talking about defining and basing conclusions about our O on.

You state first game of the season…and Bucs game defined for you our 2024 O.

Like missing AJ and Smitty was a complete nonfactor to our passing game. Not really even sure how to attempt to figure how you arrived at that conclusion even. Makes no sense to me.