3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Or how about the exact Siri quote” how we are going to mesh things together”

Exactly my point…exactly countering your beliefs. From HC own mouth

Meshing concepts is very different than " “having to use Sirianni’s terminology”. Meshing concepts is a vey easy Training Camp task. Not something that needs to use the early Regular Season games to work out.

Further, meshing concepts doesn’t address the failure to leverage the strengths.

4 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Nothing about terminology. Basically the article said the integration of Moore’s concepts would be a piece of cake, because the good was already there. So no honeymoon needed.

And the integration ended up failing to leverage the inherent strengths of the resources … and putting Hurts and all the O in high risk situations, which resulted in a high rate of turnovers.

"His job was to make Siri’s O work again and enhance it.”

How does that equate to install your own O and terminology to you?

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m taking all those extra effort just for your benefit to educate you about intel I already knew all about. At least appreciate that’s what I’m just doing here..for you.

I don’t care about the Byzantine recesses of your mind. That is a dark cavern I don’t need to go into. You need to bring your sources out into the light of day. You sound like Trump when he says, " I have heard …”

I’m now convinced this was all a deliberate(fairly elaborate)plan by Rosie from the start to trick Moore into building Siri’s O.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The integration was a success that resulted in throwing up a double Nickle in the NFC Championship game

No, the integration produced 2-2 and a spate of turnovers. The NFCCG was the result of the Stoutland scheme being brought together with the Moore and Sirianni schemes. And the Fangio scheme more importantly

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

I don’t care about the Byzantine recesses of your mind. That is a dark cavern I don’t need to go into. You need to bring your sources out into the light of day. You sound like Trump when he says, " I have heard …”

I brought you over a dozen different articles backing my statements up countering your beliefs. With several sources included in there.

Proof after proof after proof…with source after source…dig all that up just to help educate you about the situation

32 minutes ago, mattwill said:

All that may have been going on in your head, but you never wrote up any comment saying that. Again, your imagination running wild.

Stated it more than just once in fact

8 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Meshing concepts is very different than " "having to use Sirianni’s terminology”. Meshing concepts is a vey easy Training Camp task. Not something that needs to use the early Regular Season games to work out.

Further, meshing concepts doesn’t address the failure to leverage the strengths.

You stated it was completely Moore’s O all the way ..not Siri O at all even

But yeah…whole goal was to have Moore build and improve Siri O. So terminology would be obvious to be maintained.

Sirianni has emphasized the importance of consistency in terminology for players, particularly the quarterback, receivers, and offensive linemen. This suggests that they are trying to keep the language used for plays as similar as possible to aid player understanding and execution. 

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Sirianni has emphasized the importance of consistency in terminology for players, particularly the quarterback, receivers, and offensive linemen. This suggests that they are trying to keep the language used for plays as similar as possible to aid player understanding and execution. 

Didn’t I already share this? You’re acting like I didn’t.

Do you just want to battle against me as most important to you? Or are you curious and interested in learning some things about our Eagles organization and what’s been going on?

Either way…I’ve made large attempt to provide mountains of information right here for you…If you so chose to not just blanket deny accepting all this information.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My statement was exactly it was least relevant game to define our O based on. You getting things very twisted. This was your statement you defined based on first four games you stated.

And your statement was your weasely attempt to change the initial proposition that all games are of equal value in the Standings. They are all equal to one.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

while Johnson was the OC, it was 100 percent Sirianni’s offense you were watching last season, and Sirianni wanted to do it his way. That meant a conservative, run-first approach, especially when they got near the red zone. And last year, opposing defenses were ready for it. Johnson wasn’t calling his own plays. He was solely focused on giving Sirianni the offense that Sirianni wanted to run."

Now we have Tim McManus, Dianna Russini, and Andrew DiCecco, all having said the same thing. The offense was Nick Sirianni's. He ran the show

Link?

You provide your own words and then put those words in the mouths of others. That is essentially fraud on your part and/or copyright violation.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

After a meeting with offensive linemen Lane Johnson, Jordan Mailata, and Landon Dickerson, Philadelphia Eagles head coach Nick Sirianni adjusted the team's offensive strategy to become more run-oriented.

Source? Link?

You are the King of hearsay.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m taking all those extra effort just for your benefit to educate you about intel I already knew all about. At least appreciate that’s what I’m just doing here..for you.

You are doing nothing. You are both meaningless and not a primary source. At best you are a tertiary source.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

"His job was to make Siri’s O work again and enhance it.”

How does that equate to install your own O and terminology to you?

Whose words? Moore’s or a secondary source?

31 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Link?

You provide your own words and then put those words in the mouths of others. That is essentially fraud on your part and/or copyright violation.

Copy and paste…copy and paste…all it is

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I brought you over a dozen different articles backing my statements up countering your beliefs. With several sources included in there.

You provided one source. That one was the Fox Sports article, which wasn’t a primary source, but rather a secondary source … a talking head.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Copy and paste…copy and paste…all it is

If that is the case, then copy and paste the url to the article.

Doesn’t really matter to me. I always have understood all this going on. Just threw a bunch of it out there providing it for your benefit. Take it or leave it.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Proof after proof after proof…with source after source…dig all that up just to help educate you about the situation

Only one source … the Fox Sports link.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Only one source … the Fox Sports link.

Siri own word quotes. Moore own word quotes. Several reporters sighted…on and on…