8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Such a burden lacking O mind coaching

Such a burden having to listen to a one tracked mind drone on about only one third of the game while ignoring the other two thirds.

You have told us before, and we have heard you. No need to endlessly repeat yourself.

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

That O plan that lead to 4 scoring drives in a row lol and only stopped because of a delay which is probably the only thing that also saved the defense…

I agree with your first part, but I’m confident that Vic and the Defensive coaches made adjustments during Half Time and what we saw in the Second Half … a shutout … were the result.

Just now, mattwill said:

I agree with your first part, but I’m confident that Vic and the Defensive coaches made adjustments during Half Time and what we saw in the Second Half … a shutout … were the result.

After an hour delay for the weather. I don’t have as much confidence that shutout happens if there wasn’t an hour delay.

Because we were also shut out after the delay

21 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Such a burden having to listen to a one tracked mind drone on about only one third of the game while ignoring the other two thirds.

You have told us before, and we have heard you. No need to endlessly repeat yourself.

You asked…what has been that glaringly obvious issue

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You asked…what has been that glaringly obvious issue

I don’t think you recognized the sarcasm.

We have a talent…it’s not that. I feel confident if given just a fair chance…our guys can get open and make plays.

18 hours ago, mattwill said:

@cunninghamtheman can you help out a senior citizen? What is the glaring issue you two are talking past one another about?

18 hours ago, mattwill said:

@cunninghamtheman can you help out a senior citizen? What is the glaring issue you two are talking past one another about?

Missed the sarcasm attempt

Just one game…but gotta come up with some kind of better plan on O.

On D it’s what we’ve been talking about. Does lead to some alternating theories on why

48 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

After an hour delay for the weather. I don’t have as much confidence that shutout happens if there wasn’t an hour delay.

Because we were also shut out after the delay

Our D was looking to be real gassed. Something I was already noticing…believe that weather delay benefitted us.

4 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

That O plan that lead to 4 scoring drives in a row lol and only stopped because of a delay which is probably the only thing that also saved the defense…

It's hilarious the two different perspectives.. I've heard the criticism of the Dallas DC playing that coverage with the 4 man rush and giving Hurts the running lanes.

But interesting hearing criticism of scoring 3 TDs on all 3 first half drives ...then a FG before the weather delay.

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

How would you change it? What is your proposed solution to your perceived problem?

Huge problem scoring TDs every first half drive... we need to change that next game.

31 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We have a talent…it’s not that. I feel confident if given just a fair chance…our guys can get open and make plays.

You are looking for a passing-first offensive scheme. The Eagles are committed to a running-first offensive scheme.

With that inconvenient reality dispensed with, what changes would you implement to get the WRs open. They were blanketed/bracketed by the Cowboys on Thursday … CB low and Safety high … on both AJ and Devonta. How would your scheme counteract that?

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Our D was looking to be real gassed. Something I was already noticing…believe that weather delay benefitted us.

It benefitted both Defenses.

Gassed just before the Half? The results on the field don’t support that. Both the last two Cowboys drives were stopped, while their first two were not stopped. How does your "gassed” conjecture account for that improvement?

39 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Missed the sarcasm attempt

Correct. You did.

17 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Huge problem scoring TDs every first half drive... we need to change that next game.

Simple just give more for Hurts to work with. He should just be able to distribute to all these weapons to stay consistently ahead of the chains.

2 hours ago, mattwill said:

How would you change it? What is your proposed solution to your perceived problem?

I'm not laughing at your post, I am laughing because of the coming 400 page monologue on how things should be done 🤣

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We have a talent…it’s not that. I feel confident if given just a fair chance…our guys can get open and make plays.

Then why don't they? It's their job to get open as receivers and it's the QB's job to find them. The job of the defense is to NOT give them that chance. IDK of any play call that says "run slow with poor route breaks so you are covered" Of course if we are back to the 1 read and run there will be limited opportunities for all receivers and no play call in the playbook calls for 1 read

31 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Simple just give more for Hurts to work with. He should just be able to distribute to all these weapons to stay consistently ahead of the chains.

He has the best supporting cast overall in the league. AJ I catch for 8 yards(albeit an important 8 yards) AJ is not going to stay happy with stats like that. Smitty didn't exactly light it up either. Those are 2 highly paid weapons not being used

It's week 1, the first game for many of the 1's. They have to oil the machine and get the dust off. Coaches too so no need to panic. We got the W

37 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He has the best supporting cast overall in the league. AJ I catch for 8 yards(albeit an important 8 yards) AJ is not going to stay happy with stats like that. Smitty didn't exactly light it up either. Those are 2 highly paid weapons not being used

Too good to be blanket covered that often with the defenders predicting their routes.

We got the W…but do we have the O coaching to go where we wish?

59 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Then why don't they? It's their job to get open as receivers and it's the QB's job to find them. The job of the defense is to NOT give them that chance. IDK of any play call that says "run slow with poor route breaks so you are covered" Of course if we are back to the 1 read and run there will be limited opportunities for all receivers and no play call in the playbook calls for 1 read

Are you accusing AJ and Smiity of "running slow with poor route breaks?”

We need to sweep the Bucs this season. Feels like that will mean 2-0

Vic stands by Adooree starting week two