5 minutes ago, mattwill said:

You said nothing about his quote. You only addressed your own quote.

I addressed him quoting me falsely adding in a bunch of BS I never said to be quoted. FACT!

4 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Never once did you use the word "extra.” Plus the post you replied to had nothing "extra.”

Pull up the quote he quoted me saying then. Where is it? Doesn’t exist…not from me.

10 minutes ago, mattwill said:

You said you never said what you said. You asked anyone to prove it. Your own words proved it. You yourself proved it. Are you calling yourself a liar?

False! Wrong. Try again

6 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Never once did you use the word "extra.” Plus the post you replied to had nothing "extra.”

That has been the whole point I was making was about false quoting me. You can go back as far as you like…doesn’t exist.

Ham, here is the sequence of comments.

First GB said:

On 12/16/2025 at 2:54 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

65.2 completion(before stat padding vs LV)

Then 12 minutes later you responded to him saying:

On 12/16/2025 at 3:06 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Stat padding? he came out of the game and padded McKee’s trade value stats

Then you challenged anyone to prove you said what you said in your 3:06 response. So I simply accepted your challenge and went back and got your post. Read it and weep. You words are very clear preserved in black and white, "Stat padding? he came out of the game and padded McKee’s trade value stats”

16 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I challenge anybody to go back and prove where this was my quote. Just shameless putting words under seemingly my quote. Not quoting me….my name…then a bunch of FL crap.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That has been the whole point I was making was about false quoting me. You can go back as far as you like…doesn’t exist.

You may have thought that, but you never SAID that. Your imagination is your own worst enemy. Either that or your typing fingers.

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

False! Wrong. Try again

Not false, as I clearly showed below. The facts don’t lie.

3 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Ham, here is the sequence of comments.

First GB said:

Then 12 minutes later you responded to him saying:

Then you challenged anyone to prove you said what you said in your 3:06 response. So I simply accepted your challenge and went back and got your post. Read it and weep. You words are very clear preserved in black and white, "Stat padding? he came out of the game and padded McKee’s trade value stats”

13 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Pull up the quote he quoted me saying then. Where is it? Doesn’t exist…not from me.

Here it is for the umpteenth time. Can’t you read?

On 12/16/2025 at 3:06 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Stat padding? he came out of the game and padded McKee’s trade value stats

15 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I addressed him quoting me falsely adding in a bunch of BS I never said to be quoted. FACT!

No you never addressed that at all. You may think you addressed it but there was a brain fart in the communication to your fingers doing the typing.

you did all that but missed where he created all that phony BS under the guise of my supposed Quote? Why don’t you go back and locate a huge made up quote he posted. Once you do that….then you’ll easily understand. Really doubting you will however.

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Here it is for the umpteenth time. Can’t you read?

Nope…not it. Try again…but much harder(er)

16 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I challenge anybody to go back and prove where this was my quote. Just shameless putting words under seemingly my quote. Not quoting me….my name…then a bunch of FL crap.

So I quoted FL supposedly quoting me right here. Why don’t you read it. Then go back and find where you could quote me saying all that. Good luck….not there.

5 minutes ago, mattwill said:

No you never addressed that at all. You may think you addressed it but there was a brain fart in the communication to your fingers doing the typing.

How do you explain the post I quoted directly before this where that’s exactly what I did originally then?

8 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Here it is for the umpteenth time. Can’t you read?

You’re still failing

15 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Not false, as I clearly showed below. The facts don’t lie.

You can’t follow along. You’re doing great at quoting me. Well done. What you’d have to do is quote me saying what FL BS created under supposedly quoting me. Which you can’t possibly do. But keep trying….maybe you’ll get there…well no no no you won’t!

Anybody find an actual post with me saying all that FL quoted me saying yet? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

How do you explain the post I quoted directly before this where that’s exactly what I did originally then?

Very easy to explain. You clearly didn’t

/don’t understand where his response to you starts and your post that he quoted ends. Reading is fundamental. His response was:

On 12/16/2025 at 8:36 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/gamelog/_/id/4685201/tanner-mckee 3/3 passes, just HEROIC LOL. See how useless that stat can be? Like McKee but I still understand 3/3 isn't heroic LOL

14. Does passer rating double count completion percentage?

Yes, passer rating arguably double-counts completion percentage by favoring quarterbacks who tend to throw short passes, regardless of the effectiveness of those passes.

Your question he was responding to was:

On 12/16/2025 at 3:06 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Stat padding? he came out of the game and padded McKee’s trade value stats

"I think a lot of it has to do with the communication and just jelling through things,” said the OC.

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So you can’t pull up my quote only that says all that FL created under supposedly him quoting me. Thank you…exactly. Total made up crap added under supposedly quoting me.

Those voices.......on the board......are they in the room with us right now?

Yikes

updated playoff scenario

11 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Nope…not it. Try again…but much harder(er)

Dude. You understand how dumb you sound?

10 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You can’t follow along. You’re doing great at quoting me. Well done. What you’d have to do is quote me saying what FL BS created under supposedly quoting me. Which you can’t possibly do. But keep trying….maybe you’ll get there…well no no no you won’t!

So why don't you state exactly what you are talking about. Because to the rest of the world you look like an idiot every time Matt posts the quote you keep denying.

Say EXACTLY what " this extra BS" is.

Until you do that, you sound like a 4 year old with chocolate all over his face denying that he ate the chocolate cake!

Your communication skills blow! Matt backed up his point with the quotes... you now have to show what you mean. Until you do , you sound like the idiot, not anyone else.

If you don't want to be part of the discussion as an equal, why are you even here?

And then this same crap takes 6 pages ...just end the conversation by showing exactly what the mis quote was.

F@lk you are frustrating human being ...condolences to your family and any possible acquaintances.