4 hours ago4 hr Author Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:It doesn’t effect anything lol the Eagles rarely ever just cut or waive injured player…. What makes them a well liked organization they do tend to take care of players…. BVS is on IR not using a roster spotHe will be rostered when he's healthy,so of course it will affect the roster
4 hours ago4 hr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:He will be rostered when he's healthy,so of course it will affect the rosterIf we had no plan to bring him back he should be cut then
4 hours ago4 hr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:He will be rostered when he's healthy,so of course it will affect the rosterHe could be healthy but just not activated
4 hours ago4 hr 4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:If we had no plan to bring him back he should be cut thenWhy? We can easily cut him when he is healthy in the offseason moving him now effects Nothing…. We also have a 90 man roster to fill out so it’s is highly likely we will bring him back to compete just like we will likely bring back Elliott but he needs to compete for his job next offseason
4 hours ago4 hr 6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:If we had no plan to bring him back he should be cut thenKeep all your options you can
4 hours ago4 hr Author 2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:Why? We can easily cut him when he is healthy in the offseason moving him now effects Nothing…. We also have a 90 man roster to fill out so it’s is highly likely we will bring him back to compete just like we will likely bring back Elliott but he needs to compete for his job next offseasonSure,but why keep a guy around if you have no plans to use him later??? I'm well aware it doesn't affect the roster NOW,but it's pointless to keep him around if you are planning to cut him anyhow. What other FB will compete with him for the FB job?
4 hours ago4 hr Author Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:Damn it Saquon WIDE OPEN drop must be KP faultHad to be
4 hours ago4 hr 1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:Damn it Saquon WIDE OPEN drop must be KP faultConsistent struggle Saquan always possessed
4 hours ago4 hr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:Sure,but why keep a guy around if you have no plans to use him later??? I'm well aware it doesn't affect the roster NOW,but it's pointless to keep him around if you are planning to cut him anyhow. What other FB will compete with him for the FB job?Because we going to need bodies to fill out our roster again he will likely compete for a job but I think he is far from a lock like he was this year
4 hours ago4 hr Author Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:Because we going to need bodies to fill out our roster again he will likely compete for a job but I think he is far from a lock like he was this yearOnce again there is no competition at FB. I think we had some designed plays for him. It's his job,there is no competition for it unless we draft another FB
3 hours ago3 hr In my mind if you are even going to keep a FB on the roster…part of that job is being super durable.
3 hours ago3 hr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:Once again there is no competition at FB. I think we had some designed plays for him. It's his job,there is no competition for it unless we draft another FBLatu seems like legitimate competition at FB or in that similar role while also giving us a 3rd TE option and that doesn’t count for if we add anyone else in the offseason or if we even look to use a FB moving forward so many variables
3 hours ago3 hr Author 1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:Latu seems like legitimate competition at FB or in that similar role while also giving us a 3rd TE option and that doesn’t count for if we add anyone else in the offseason or if we even look to use a FB moving forward so many variablesWhy I think it's odd we don't try BVS as a TE. A few more pounds and he's there
3 hours ago3 hr We had designs for a FB this season. Believe that’s been a factor with the break through for Goedert. He benefitted with the forced adjustment.
Create an account or sign in to comment