2 minutes ago, joemas72 said:

not check the rest of his body

They did check the rest of his body AFTER they found the leg clot. They were afraid it would break off. So let me ask you, if it didn't break off how did he get clots on his lungs????

Just now, DownwithDallas said:

That's cause they couldn't run. But the same amount of QB scrambling happened to none.

30 vs 45 passes is a huge difference. Come on now. When McKee throws 30 times...we will get more of a true sense if anything is different.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

They did check the rest of his body AFTER they found the leg clot. They were afraid it would break off. So let me ask you, if it didn't break off how did he get clots on his lungs????

Hunh? It obviously moved to the lungs...otherwise they would have found it in London and he wouldn't have played.

I'm not following where your mind is trying to wander?

Just now, joemas72 said:

30 vs 45 passes is a huge difference. Come on now. When McKee throws 30 times...we will get more of a true sense if anything is different.

Yeah his pass attempts were up all they did was stack the box daring him to throw. We couldn't run even against there pathetic run defense so he had to pass. We still need to run more no matter what just to keep the defense honest.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

They did check the rest of his body AFTER they found the leg clot. They were afraid it would break off. So let me ask you, if it didn't break off how did he get clots on his lungs????

The leg clot caused the reaction from docs to scan the rest of his body for clotting. As I said he could have had lung clots for awhile. Maybe he had those before the leg clot showed up

1 minute ago, joemas72 said:

Hunh? It obviously moved to the lungs...otherwise they would have found it in London and he wouldn't have played.

I'm not following where your mind is trying to wander?

But you said the clot didn't move right???? If it didn't move how did he get lung clots? He would only get those if A) it DID move/broke apart or B) he already had them

2 minutes ago, DownwithDallas said:

Yeah his pass attempts were up all they did was stack the box daring him to throw. We couldn't run even against there pathetic run defense so he had to pass. We still need to run more no matter what just to keep the defense honest.

I think you are missing the idea that we had only Pierce at RB...he had to stay on the field, so they limited his rush attempts.

When that changes ...that's when I want to see how McKee does.

4 minutes ago, joemas72 said:

your mind is trying to wander?

it's not wandering LOL. I'm failing to get you to understand

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

But you said the clot didn't move right???? if it didn't move how did he get lung clots?

Hunh? When did I say the clot didn't move? It's exactly what they are saying... that it moved to the lungs? I'm confused by what you are trying to say?

If he has had lung clots awhile without showing any effects there would be no reason to scan for them. Now, after he got the leg clot, they had reason to scan the rest of his body where they found the lung clots. Better?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

it's not wandering LOL. I'm failing to get you to understand

Yes...you are failing to get me to understand that in the hospital they won't check the rest of the body after finding a clot???

1 minute ago, joemas72 said:

Hunh? When did I say the clot didn't move? It's exactly what they are saying... that it moved to the lungs? I'm confused by what you are trying to say?

Ok then they should have forbidden him to play

1 minute ago, joemas72 said:

Yes...you are failing to get me to understand that in the hospital they won't check the rest of the body after finding a clot???

How do you know that he didn't have lung clots first? Do we scan every player before every game for lung clots? The leg clot was obviously visible, lung clots are not until you scan for them.

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Ok then they should have forbidden him to play

Are you pranking me with this ?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

How do you know that he didn't have lung clots first? Do we scan every player before every game for lung clots? The leg clot was obviously visible, lung clots are not until you scan for them.

So as I said,possibly he already had lung clots, the leg clot just gave them reason to scan the rest of his body

Just now, joemas72 said:

Are you pranking me with this ?

No Joe, I m explaining medical possibilities. Lung clots would go unnoticed for weeks maybe. The fact the leg clot was visible gave them cause to check the rest of him out. IDK what you aren't grasping

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

How do you know that he didn't have lung clots first? Do we scan every player before every game for lung clots? The leg clot was obviously visible, lung clots are not until you scan for them.

GB... Hurts went to a hospital in London. They found something in his leg. Why would tou think that right there in London while Hurts is spending all that time there...that the hospital wouldn't check his lungs?

1)Hurts had lung clots 2) a clot became visible on his calf 3) Docs ran tests to see if he had clotting elsewhere 4) they found clots on his lungs

1 minute ago, joemas72 said:

GB... Hurts went to a hospital in London. They found something in his leg. Why would tou think that right there in London while Hurts is spending all that time there...that the hospital wouldn't check his lungs?

They checked his lungs BECAUSE he had a visible leg clot. Lung clots are NOT visible to a team doctor unless they are ORDERED

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

No Joe, I m explaining medical possibilities. Lung clots would go unnoticed for weeks maybe. The fact the leg clot was visible gave them cause to check the rest of him out. IDK what you aren't grasping

I'm grasping that you don't seem to understand that they checked his lungs... In the London Hospital before the game!

Obviously the lungs were checked and were clean while in London. It moved after he came back and showed up after the Wednesday practice or before the Thursday practice.

Do you see some other timeline by some different information that you have?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

They checked his lungs BECAUSE he had a visible leg clot. Lung clots are NOT visible to a team doctor unless they are ORDERED

AGAIN...THE LONDON HOSPITAL CHECKED HIS LUNGS...BEFORE THE GAME. THE CLOT WASN'T THERE. IT MOVED ONCE HE GOT BACK AFTER WEDNESDAY PRACTICE

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO, if they found lung clots why was he allowed to play?

They didn't find the clots on his lungs ... when they did...thar was it, that's when it was over.

1 minute ago, joemas72 said:

I'm grasping that you don't seem to understand that they checked his lungs... In the London Hospital before the game!

Obviously the lungs were checked and were clean while in London. It moved after he came back and showed up after the Wednesday practice or before the Thursday practice.

Do you see some other timeline by some different information that you have?

Ok now I understand. I didn't know he was clear in London

Just now, joemas72 said:

AGAIN...THE LONDON HOSPITAL CHECKED HIS LUNGS...BEFORE THE GAME. THE CLOT WASN'T THERE. IT MOVED ONCE HE GOT BACK AFTER WEDNESDAY PRACTICE

Gotcha

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO, if they found lung clots why was he allowed to play?

Are you seriously saying that rhey found clots in his lungs in London and yet he still played?