May 30, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: That technically is 66.6 percent. Two thirds of the snaps would be exactly the amount to screw us in fact. Wow.... you can do math... so really no excuse to not do a little research on the contracts and how things work in 2024. A math question for you ... say the jets have 1200 snaps defensively... Reddick plays 2/3 of the snaps ... vs playing the amount he needs to get the 2nd round pick (if he reaches 10 sacks)... what is the number of snaps he would be short?
May 30, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: Ahhh there it is.... the whole looking to resolve Hurts from blame.... thus needing to make up stuff about Reddick. 5000 snaps 10 sacks...one turnover... brought in younger dude who played way less snaps, same production...plus a pick and now have the opportunity for the other guys to grow. Not a choice of the current DC...but yet the wrong move...lol. Why...because we can't blame Hurts for anything...lol. But " I wanted Wentz to be the Savior" ...he was ok with John Hightower...etc... but we gotta give Hurts everything....the guy who " is the best QB in franchise history " Come on man.....always the agenda. It's pathetic now. I’m the one looking at the whole team situation fairly….and calling it like it is. It’s you and others here that will inevitably blame Hurts for all negatives…like clock work.
May 30, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Siri called Reddick The Closer…because he closed out two games with big plays. He earned that..the hard way. yeah...2022
May 30, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: Yea...compared the sacks. Reddick has so many more sacks over the last four years it’s not even close
May 30, 20241 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: I’m the one looking at the whole team situation fairly….and calling it like it is. It’s you and others here that will inevitably blame Hurts for all negatives…like clock work. Why does it matter who gets blame... its none of us????? Who cares who gets blamed... they either win or don't ... why does it matter to you. and specifically why so much with Hurts.
May 30, 20241 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Reddick has so many more sacks over the last four years it’s not even close in 2023
May 30, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: I think you are really jaded by your relationship with Hurts. It messes with all of your logic. I think you make an excellent point…but it’s about yourself…your so jaded by your Hurts hating agenda.
May 30, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: I’m saying him being disgruntled then forced to trade him changes the whole thing didn't change a thing... except for $1.1 mil per season. you don't think it was a great move .... 2 years at that price plus a day two pick coming back?
May 30, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: Wow.... you know what I noticed... 32 teams seem to agree with No Mas. 31 teams agreed with you before we signed Reddick…then he performed like a top pass rusher.
May 30, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: I think you make an excellent point…but it’s about yourself…your so jaded by your Hurts hating agenda. Not at all... he is my teams QB for the next 3 years... it is what it is. He will either deliver or not... don't really care about him at all. Such insignificance in my life really.
May 30, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: If the Jets are all in... and Reddick is the player you think he is.... then why can't he play 2/3 of the snaps? Jets are ‘all in’ and brought in Reddick even if just for a one year rental…what’s that make us this season?
May 30, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: 31 teams agreed with you before we signed Reddick…then he performed like a top pass rusher. And yet nobody wanted to trade us any more or pay him??? Show where No Mas is wrong here?
May 30, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Jets are ‘all in’ and brought in Reddick even if just for a one year rental…what’s that make us this season? The Jets lost Huff first... they were " forced" to make a move there.
May 30, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: And 74 % of the snaps was part of the reason to let him go. He can't play that much and also have us get the young guys going. That was a bad coaching mistake. Overused Reddick which hurt him and developing Nolan specifically. That’s just bad coaching decisions. Bad argument on your part…again. Goes more towards my view point the way I see things…than yours.
May 30, 20241 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: That was a bad coaching mistake. Overused Reddick which hurt him and developing Nolan specifically. That’s just bad coaching decisions. Bad argument on your part…again. Goes more towards my view point the way I see things…than yours. Yes... you see things in the past... but refuse to answer... how do you give Reddick the snaps, and still get the young guys playing time. You tell me.... what was your strategy? you pay Reddick the 3 years $75 million .... you play him 50% of the snaps this year, where does that fit with Huff, Smith, Hunt, Sweat and BG? Or do you keep him here at the original contract even though he would be disgruntled. Just commit to a specific move or solution and stand behind it.
May 30, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, joemas6 said: in 2023 More even still…in the huge breakout season for Bryce and the season you slam Reddick for having…
May 30, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Yes... you see things in the past... but refuse to answer... how do you give Reddick the snaps, and still get the young guys playing time. You tell me.... what was your strategy? you pay Reddick the 3 years $75 million .... you play him 50% of the snaps this year, where does that fit with Huff, Smith, Hunt, Sweat and BG? Or do you keep him here at the original contract even though he would be disgruntled. Just commit to a specific move or solution and stand behind it. It all just shows how a great signing identifying a quality player can still not work out very ideally. Nolan should have played more snaps last season. Reddick should have not been overused last season. I call that "bad coaching decision.”
May 30, 20241 yr 11 minutes ago, joemas6 said: in 2023 Reddick had 6 or more pressures in over half the games last season. That will be missed…you’ll see.
May 30, 20241 yr I’m obviously conflicted on the path of the team. Not huge on retaining Siri and hiring Moore. Not that high on how Rosie throws his weight around. Paying the older vet RB is more of an ‘all in move’ to me. Yet I see us as getting younger rebuilding under new schemes team.
May 30, 20241 yr 30 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Reddick had 6 or more pressures in over half the games last season. That will be missed…you’ll see. Still no answer?
May 30, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: I’m obviously conflicted on the path of the team. Not huge on retaining Siri and hiring Moore. Not that high on how Rosie throws his weight around. Paying the older vet RB is more of an ‘all in move’ to me. Yet I see us as getting younger rebuilding under new schemes team. Again... stick to the subject here. i'm not going to be all over the place while trying to work etc. What would you have done spcifically with Reddick. And I disagree ... it is still a great deal 2 years $32.2 million ... add in the day 2 pick. It's a good deal, I would do it all over again. I'm not emotionally attached to the players like you are... Hurts and " the closer" so I don't care if they leave if I feel its the right move. For the money and getting the draft picks, Reddick worked out more than fine
May 30, 20241 yr 35 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Reddick had 6 or more pressures in over half the games last season. That will be missed…you’ll see. Cox will be missed... that's my concern. DL must stop the run first and create passing situations. Not worried about a Mike Mamula stat as much. Almost is great in horse shoes or hand grenades... " pressures" is also an subjective stat. Reddick didn't force the QB into many mistakes last year... IDK what to tell you, you fall in love with a player and you lose all logic
May 30, 20241 yr Again... great deal for the Eagles... it wasn't an "early" signing so again you ventured off the original topic. Reddick over valued his position in the league as none of the teams offered him the $$ he was looking for...any of them could have offered more than a 2026 3rd round pick. If I'm a team, I sign a guy for 3 years and then he wants a new deal.... only way I'm giving that to him after year 1 is if he is in my plans long term...with an extension. Otherwise I think the Eagles absolutely did the right thing. They got a younger upstart player plus a pick and locked in that price for 3 years, now if this guy really steps up, then he is young enough to where I look into an extension before the 3 years. Team controls that. Just like the team controlled everything ..AJ, Dickerson, Smith, Mailata...and all the guys before that. They weren't " forced" into anything. The Eagles specifically are a team that will spend money on players they want.
May 30, 20241 yr Davis did this real slow fake jog for like ten steps and then put his hands on his hips like he finished running a race. This guy has to get his butt in shape. We need him to play a good amount of snaps this season…for the whole season.
May 30, 20241 yr 13 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Again... stick to the subject here. i'm not going to be all over the place while trying to work etc. What would you have done spcifically with Reddick. And I disagree ... it is still a great deal 2 years $32.2 million ... add in the day 2 pick. It's a good deal, I would do it all over again. I'm not emotionally attached to the players like you are... Hurts and " the closer" so I don't care if they leave if I feel its the right move. For the money and getting the draft picks, Reddick worked out more than fine Seems like like you are extremely emotionally to some players. Very driven to hate on Hurts…while cryingand still bringing up defending Wentz.
Create an account or sign in to comment