March 5Mar 5 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:I watched the full video dumba**, of course I know he didn’t assault anyone. Now the Senator on the other hand…Wow, so you are saying you are just ignorant and wrong again. Shocking.Let's make it simple and use the big ones. Holding onto the door while LEOS remove him? Resisting arrest.See him touch the officers while fighting his removal which is why multiple officers were involved? Assaulting a LEO. He did more, but it doesn't matter if he just put his pinky on them.Will the charges be dropped? Hopefully. He has the broken arm that's enough. Will the senator be in trouble? Hell no.
March 5Mar 5 1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:Wow, so you are saying you are just ignorant and wrong again. Shocking.Let's make it simple and use the big ones. Holding onto the door while LEOS remove him? Resisting arrest.See him touch the officers while fighting his removal which is why multiple officers were involved? Assaulting a LEO. He did more, but it doesn't matter if he just put his pinky on them.Touching Again, we both know no jury is ever gonna convict this dude.
March 5Mar 5 5 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:You don't understand the First Amendment. There are limitations like not yelling fire in a theater to use the common example. You can protest but it has to be legal protests. If you are being removed you have to comply during arrest. You can not touch a LEO. That's not manipulating anything. Like I said you can't run onto a football field and protest or streak. If you do you will be tackled and removed and what happens is on you for making that choice.He should not have been removed. He should've been given the chance to speak. Then, if he kept going on for awhile and holding up the proceedings, they should have first attempted to have him leave without putting their hands on him. But they put their hands on him right away because they're a bunch of weak men with a badge that makes them feel like big, bad boys.
March 5Mar 5 Just now, VanHammersly said:Touching Again, we both know no jury is ever gonna convict this dude.Like I said I hope it doesn't even get to that point and they drop them. Like the 4th or 5th time I've said that. Hope he just has the broken arm as a punishment and doesn't need surgery.
March 5Mar 5 Just now, EaglesRocker97 said:He should not have been removed. He should've been given the chance to speak. Then, if he kept going on for awhile and holding up the proceedings, they should have first attempted to have him leave without putting their hands on him. But they put their hands on him right away because they're a bunch of weak men with a badge that makes them feel like big, bad boys.Cool opinion. That's now how things work. They put their hands on him once again using the football example just like the NFL does anytime you run onto the field. Look at this protestor trying to make a statement about something.
March 5Mar 5 5 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:You don't understand the First Amendment. There are limitations like not yelling fire in a theater to use the common example. You can protest but it has to be legal protests. If you are being removed you have to comply during arrest. You can not touch a LEO. That's not manipulating anything. Like I said you can't run onto a football field and protest or streak. If you do you will be tackled and removed and what happens is on you for making that choice.He should not have been removed. He should've been given the chance to speak. Then, if he kept going on for awhile and holding up the proceedings, they should have first attempted to have him leave without putting their hands on him. But they put their hands on him right away because they're a bunch of weak men with a badge that makes them feel like big, bad boys.6 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:Cool opinion. That's now how things work. They put their hands on him once again using the football example just like the NFL does anytime you run onto the field.Look at this protestor trying to make a statement about something.What a piss-poor comparison. These are not analogous.
March 5Mar 5 3 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said:He should not have been removed. He should've been given the chance to speak. Then, if he kept going on for awhile and holding up the proceedings, they should have first attempted to have him leave without putting their hands on him. But they put their hands on him right away because they're a bunch of weak men with a badge that makes them feel like big, bad boys.What a piss-poor comparison. These are not analogous.You keep saying he shouldn't have been, but he was there illegally. So yeah he should have and yes they had a right to. They are the same thing no matter what you want to say. I have the law on my side and you have feelings.
March 5Mar 5 WFTVProtester, three Capitol Police officers treated for inju...A man protesting the war in Iran has been arrested after a struggle in a U.S. Senate building"The protester, Brian C. McGinnis of North Carolina, was arrested and faces three counts of assaulting a police officer and three counts of resisting arrest and unlawful demonstration, the Capitol Police said in a statement."I'm sure the Capitol Police don't understand the law either or what constitutes assaulting a police officer.
March 5Mar 5 1 hour ago, Diehardfan said:He won't. They like law and order in Montana. Again, protest all you want, but do not resist arrest and put your hands on LEOs. The moment you get physical is the moment you are 100% in the wrong and are responsible for what happens.But don’t resist and put your hands on LEOs?? Ummm why did Trump pardon the J6ers that beat LEOs??
March 5Mar 5 Just now, barho said:It don’t resist and put your hands on LEOs?? Ummm why did Trump pardon the J6ers that beat LEOs??What is it the people here always say "whataboutism" Call the Capital Police tomorrow and tell them they don't know the law when it comes to assaulting a LEO and to drop the charges. How about that?
March 5Mar 5 Everyone knows that if you say the words "Free Palestine" you automatically get your arm broken. That's the law!
March 5Mar 5 14 hours ago, DEagle7 said:For the military guys in here who know more than I do, what does the sinking of the Iranian ship off of Sri Lanka do to the government's argument that this is a "special operation" and not a declaration of war? That's pretty far away from the theatre, which to me screams more generalized war than targeted strike. But what do I know.There's no legal distinction b/w "special operation" and war. War is war.Any difference in what people call stuff is just to make things more politically palatable. Once the shooting starts it's game on.
March 5Mar 5 So these war mongering MAGA clowns actually think Trump is helping out the Iranian people?
March 5Mar 5 6 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:So these war mongering MAGA clowns actually think Trump is helping out the Iranian people?"Iran first, but after Venezuela!:....I believe fat boy ran on that platform.
March 5Mar 5 Just a reminder how important it is to have allies around the globe. Sure enough, the US would always help their allies, but not vice versa… Yep Donny, you always know about foreign policy.👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻Yeah, European allies have and always will be worthless. Those bases like Ramstein sure are good to have…
March 5Mar 5 Just now, mr_hunt said:It’s just a "Special Operation" as is the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Learn from the best!! 🇷🇺
Create an account or sign in to comment