13 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

@Diehardfan approves

Sure do. But it does deprive people the opportunity to go through underwear drawers. So sad.

Or CVON

6 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Sure do. But it does deprive people the opportunity to go through underwear drawers. So sad.

I'll book mark this one for when there is a POTUS you'd like to try to keep honest

3 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

I'll book mark this one for when there is a POTUS you'd like to try to keep honest

I cant wait until someone he doesnt support is in office and does some of the same things fat boy is doing

2 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

I just smacked your BS down twice with history. Try as you may to interject the GOP into this it doesn't change what the Dems were in the 90s. They were pro America, pro borders, and the rest that as I've correctly stated multiple times. Fetterman would fit right in. Today's Dems would be radicals as characters on the West Wing. You don't like him because he calls things fair on both sides and your mental illness gets triggered because Trump broke you. Get medical help.

You refuted nothing and did nothing to address my points. As usual. If you make a coherent argument of any kind in CVON it will be the first time.

52 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

But but but Snow said they couldn't. Oh well.

I literally never said they "couldn't". You continue to have reading comprehension issues coupled with massive amounts of cope and projection.

I said it was theatre. If they move ahead with this, they're going to end up creating vulnerable districts because they need to water down the current gerrymander to try and maximize the total that "lean right".

Lean right districts can be won by democrats in years like, for example, this year where the minority party tends to overperform. Which is why Republicans who know what they're talking about are pumping the brakes on the idea, and why ultimately it may not pass.

This is why Hakeem Jeffries is telling Florida "f around and find out".. because if they water down their firmly red districts to try and make more districts "lean right", they're risking losing more seats than holding pat.

Go ahead and redistrict. See what happens.

"I'M NOT A RAPIST. I'M NOT A PEDOPHILE." Trump said that. On camera. On 60 Minutes. To a journalist. Hours after a man with a shotgun came for him.

Norah O'Donnell sat across from Donald Trump on Sunday night, less than 24 hours after a man named Cole Allen charged a security checkpoint at the Washington Hilton with a shotgun, a handgun, and multiple knives. The shooter left a manifesto. O'Donnell read from it. Word for word.

"I'm no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes."

Then she asked the president for his reaction.

What followed was not the response of a man who had just survived an attempt on his life. It was the response of a man whose biggest political weakness had just been said out loud on national television.

"I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would because you're horrible people. I'm not a rapist. I didn't rape anybody. I'm not a pedophile. Excuse me. You read that crap from a sick person. I was totally exonerated. You should be ashamed of yourself, reading that. You're a disgrace."

The president of the United States, on the country's most-watched newsmagazine, looked into the camera and said the words "I'm not a rapist. I'm not a pedophile."

Twice. Of his own free will. Without being asked the question. Just because someone read what someone else wrote.

Trump was not "totally exonerated." A federal jury in May 2023 found him civilly liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll.

A federal judge subsequently ruled the jury had effectively found Trump committed rape under the common definition of the term. He was ordered to pay her $5 million.

Then $83.3 million more in a defamation case. The $5 million verdict was upheld on appeal in December 2024. Trump's en banc petition was rejected in June 2025. He has now petitioned the Supreme Court. The $83.3 million appeal is ongoing. The court records exist.

The audio of his deposition exists. His own words exist.

And the Epstein files. The Epstein flight logs. The Maxwell deposition where her lawyer offered to "exonerate" him in exchange for a pardon. The DOJ inspector general's investigation into the Bondi cover-up. The projector that lit up the side of the Hilton on Friday night with Trump's face next to Epstein's and the words END THE COVER-UP.

The shooter is in custody. The manifesto is being analyzed. The motive is officially still under investigation. But the most revealing thing about the entire incident is not what the shooter wrote. It's what the president said about it on 60 Minutes.

Norah O'Donnell read three words. Trump volunteered the rest.

The Atlantic

A Brief History of Trump’s Violent Remarks

Here are 40 instances in which the former president incited or praised violence against his fellow citizens.

13 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

I literally never said they "couldn't". You continue to have reading comprehension issues coupled with massive amounts of cope and projection.

I said it was theatre. If they move ahead with this, they're going to end up creating vulnerable districts because they need to water down the current gerrymander to try and maximize the total that "lean right".

Lean right districts can be won by democrats in years like, for example, this year where the minority party tends to overperform. Which is why Republicans who know what they're talking about are pumping the brakes on the idea, and why ultimately it may not pass.

This is why Hakeem Jeffries is telling Florida "f around and find out".. because if they water down their firmly red districts to try and make more districts "lean right", they're risking losing more seats than holding pat.

Go ahead and redistrict. See what happens.

You absolutely did. You rambled about how they already did as much as they could they couldn't draw the lines any more in their favor blah blah blah. Mental psychosis makes you forget things.

25 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

I'll book mark this one for when there is a POTUS you'd like to try to keep honest

Problematic since we have kings now

17 minutes ago, Gannan said:

You refuted nothing and did nothing to address my points. As usual. If you make a coherent argument of any kind in CVON it will be the first time.

You are mentally insane 🤣 Going off into the woods about the GOP attacking them in the 90s in a discussion about Fetterman having policies that align with Dems from that era. Your brain is cooked and you have nothing left but the ramblings of a guy Trump broke.

7 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

The Atlantic

A Brief History of Trump’s Violent Remarks

Here are 40 instances in which the former president incited or praised violence against his fellow citizens.

Needs to happen. Founders never wanted crazy people to vote. Need to be locked up in institutions.

State media's so F'ing embarassing

5 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Needs to happen. Founders never wanted crazy people to vote. Need to be locked up in institutions.

They probably wouldn't have let the people who attempted an insurrection by storming the capital the right to vote either

Just now, Mike030270 said:

They probably wouldn't have let the people who attempted an insurrection by storming the capital the right to vote either

DieHard's lucky it's not 200 years ago. All his heroes would've been lined up on the Capital lawn and hung on Jan 21st.

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

State media's so F'ing embarassing

MAGA rubes aren't so well versed in civics. Trump could convince them he invented the Secret Service to protect POTUS.

Just now, toolg said:

MAGA rubes aren't so well versed in civics. Trump could convince them he invented the Secret Service to protect POTUS.

My advice to anyone nervous about Trump's safety is seek professional help immediately.

10 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

They probably wouldn't have let the people who attempted an insurrection by storming the capital the right to vote either

Patience. Wait for that to be proven to be orchestrated and paid for by the Dems like Charlottesville

9 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

DieHard's lucky it's not 200 years ago. All his heroes would've been lined up on the Capital lawn and hung on Jan 21st.

You people would have watered the tree years ago. Love your projection

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

Patience. Wait for that to be proven to be orchestrated and paid for by the Dems like Charlotte.

You think dems paid people to dress up in maga gear and storm the capital?

I can't tell if this was an attempt at trolling or not

Dems paid the KKK to orchestrate Charlottesville

Jan 6th

4 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

You people would have watered the tree years ago. Love your projection

Projection? Republicans tried to overthrow the gov't a few years ago. There's no need to project here. And if someone tried that sheet 200+ years ago, it would've gone very different. The Founding Fathers had a pretty good track record against authoritarians.

make bs claim

investigate said bs claim (at the taxpayers expense)

attempt to indict/convict but have case tossed for lack of real evidence

keep making bs claim

this is the cycle since the "but her emails" conspiracy and cucks believe it as gospel.

11 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Patience. Wait for that to be proven to be orchestrated and paid for by the Dems like Charlottesville