May 3, 20233 yr 47 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: When I was in HS I had to turn a T-shirt inside out because it had a little green man flipping the bird with a caption that said hey Iran. Schools have always had dress codes. Not sure if you guys are familiar with the clothing brand kappa, but I also got sent to the office for wearing a shirt with their logo on it. School admin said not to worry about, teacher was a busy body. edit: shirt was long-sleeve version of this
May 3, 20233 yr 32 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Not sure if you guys are familiar with the clothing brand kappa, but I also got sent to the office for wearing a shirt with their logo on it. School admin said not to worry about, teacher was a busy body. edit: shirt was long-sleeve version of this But our 1a rights are at risk because a couple of 6 graders has to change their shirts. Not fake outrage.
May 4, 20233 yr 16 hours ago, Tnt4philly said: When I was in HS I had to turn a T-shirt inside out because it had a little green man flipping the bird with a caption that said hey Iran. Schools have always had dress codes. 15 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said: Not sure if you guys are familiar with the clothing brand kappa, but I also got sent to the office for wearing a shirt with their logo on it. School admin said not to worry about, teacher was a busy body. edit: shirt was long-sleeve version of this Yes, I'm sure the school's dress code was the reason why these kids were sent home. If you read the first article, part of the lawsuit states that the school "does not prohibit students from the right to express their political views or from wearing clothing with political slogans". As for the second - I would definitely agree that part of their dress code would be to ban any and all clothing that states a scientific fact on it. Keep licking them boots, boys!!
May 4, 20233 yr 33 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: Yes, I'm sure the school's dress code was the reason why these kids were sent home. If you read the first article, part of the lawsuit states that the school "does not prohibit students from the right to express their political views or from wearing clothing with political slogans". As for the second - I would definitely agree that part of their dress code would be to ban any and all clothing that states a scientific fact on it. Keep licking them boots, boys!! What? The point is that schools often have overly strict dress code policies. My post gave an example of me being annoyed with them, not defending them. How did you misconstrue that as me licking boots? That makes no sense.
May 4, 20233 yr 34 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: Yes, I'm sure the school's dress code was the reason why these kids were sent home. If you read the first article, part of the lawsuit states that the school "does not prohibit students from the right to express their political views or from wearing clothing with political slogans". As for the second - I would definitely agree that part of their dress code would be to ban any and all clothing that states a scientific fact on it. Keep licking them boots, boys!! This is pretty funny from a troll who likes to paint anyone who disagrees with him as being outraged. Our 1a rights are not in jeopardy because a couple of 6th graders were sent home for wearing clothing that the school deems inappropriate.
May 4, 20233 yr 6 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: What? The point is that schools often have overly strict dress code policies. My post gave an example of me being annoyed with them, not defending them. How did you misconstrue that as me licking boots? That makes no sense. He’s nothing but a troll who rides on Kzs sack.
May 4, 20233 yr 10 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: What? The point is that schools often have overly strict dress code policies. My post gave an example of me being annoyed with them, not defending them. How did you misconstrue that as me licking boots? That makes no sense. 4 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: This is pretty funny from a troll who likes to paint anyone who disagrees with him as being outraged. Our 1a rights are not in jeopardy because a couple of 6th graders were sent home for wearing clothing that the school deems inappropriate. 2 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: He’s nothing but a troll who rides on Kzs sack. Listen guys, it's ok if you hate free speech and our constitution - you have that right.
May 4, 20233 yr 55 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: Listen guys, it's ok if you hate free speech and our constitution - you have that right. Again, my post was clearly being critical of my school's stupid dress code policy. A teacher tried to say the logo on a sports shirt was considered nudity. That you read my post, and somehow came away with the impression that I was defending the dress code, is equal parts hilarious and unsurprising.
May 4, 20233 yr 5 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Again, my post was clearly being critical of my school's stupid dress code policy. A teacher tried to say the logo on sports shirt was considered nudity. That you read my post, and somehow came away with the impression that I was defending the dress code, is equal parts hilarious and unsurprising. That you read my post, and somehow came away with the impression that those kids being sent home was because of a dress code, is equal parts hilarious and further proof that you hate free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general really. Sad.
May 4, 20233 yr 1 minute ago, mikemack8 said: That you read my post, and somehow came away with the impression that those kids being sent home was because of a dress code, is equal parts hilarious and further proof that you hate free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general really. Sad. Oh I get it now, you can't read or understand words. My mistake.
May 4, 20233 yr So you're telling me that you just randomly posted a story about your school's dress code because you DIDN'T think those kids were violating their school's dress code? OK Keep up the good work
May 4, 20233 yr 34 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: So you're telling me that you just randomly posted a story about your school's dress code because you DIDN'T think those kids were violating their school's dress code? OK Keep up the good work Look, I know we often throw around cliches about trumpbots being inherently illiterate and incapable of reading a calendar, but that doesn't mean you need to go out of your way to reinforce them. This really isn't that hard, Mr. Mack. Let me break this down further into smaller digestible bites so that you don't get too overwhelmed... The example you gave was a kid who wore a "Let's Go Brandon" shirt and got in trouble for it. The teacher/school tried to claim that it was the equivalent of profanity, which is obviously stupid. It's an inside joke, meant to refer to profanity, but that's not the same thing as actual profanity. It would be like a kid wearing a shirt with the words "What the Fudge" or "Shut the Front Door" and getting in trouble for it. The school's stance on this is completely asinine but something that probably isn't too uncommon. And on that point, to describe how I was in a similar situation, I gave a personal anecdote of how a teacher in my high school similarly tried to claim the logo of my soccer shirt was equivalent to nudity, which again, is beyond stupid just as it was to the school in your article that tried to claim "LGB" was equivalent to profanity. In both cases, the school's interpretation of the dress code was clearly insane and deserving of ridicule. Take your time reading through that, I know it's a lot, but just take breaks when you get tired or confused.
May 4, 20233 yr 7 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Look, I know we often throw around cliches about trumpbots being inherently illiterate and incapable of reading a calendar, but that doesn't mean you need to go out of your way to reinforce them. This really isn't that hard, Mr. Mack. Let me break this down further into smaller digestible bites so that you don't get too overwhelmed... The example you gave was a kid who wear a "Let's Go Brandon" shirt and got in trouble for it. The teacher/school tried to claim that it was the equivalent of profanity, which is obviously stupid. It's an inside joke, meant to refer to profanity, but that's not the same thing as actual profanity. It would be like a kid wearing a shirt with the words "What the Fudge" or "Shut the Front Door" and getting in trouble for it. The school's stance on this is completely asinine but something that probably isn't too uncommon. And on that point, to describe how I was in a similar situation, I gave a personal anecdote of how a teacher in my high school similarly tried to claim the logo of my soccer shirt was equivalent to nudity, which again, is beyond stupid just as it was to the school in your article that tried to claim "LGB" was equivalent to profanity. In both cases, the school's interpretation of the dress code was clearly insane and deserving of ridicule. Take your time reading through that, I know it's a lot, but just take breaks when you get tired or confused. I appreciate the explanation. So you had teachers who also hated free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general. That explains why you and TNT feel the same way all these years later. I would have thought our supposed freedom loving President would have taken steps to eliminate this fascism but alas, here we are. The poor kid who probably has an uncle named Brandon can't even show support for him anymore, and the hopeful future scientist can't show his appreciation for gender studies. Sad.
May 4, 20233 yr 3 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: I appreciate the explanation. So you had teachers who also hated free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general. That explains why you and TNT feel the same way all these years later. I would have thought our supposed freedom loving President would have taken steps to eliminate this fascism but alas, here we are. The poor kid who probably has an uncle named Brandon can't even show support for him anymore, and the hopeful future scientist can't show his appreciation for gender studies. Sad. you're pouring it on real thick here.
May 4, 20233 yr 1 minute ago, Alpha_TATEr said: you're pouring it on real thick here. I just feel really passionately about free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general. These kids not being able to express themselves is terrible.
May 4, 20233 yr 7 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: I appreciate the explanation. So you had teachers who also hated free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general. That explains why you and TNT feel the same way all these years later. I would have thought our supposed freedom loving President would have taken steps to eliminate this fascism but alas, here we are. The poor kid who probably has an uncle named Brandon can't even show support for him anymore, and the hopeful future scientist can't show his appreciation for gender studies. Sad. Valid point, this is definitely Biden's fault.
May 4, 20233 yr 23 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: I just feel really passionately about free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general. These kids not being able to express themselves is terrible. i say dress codes for all of them (teachers included), zero freedom of expression fashion wise in schools. you're there to learn or teach, on my dime, save your fashion statements for after school hours.
May 4, 20233 yr 1 hour ago, mikemack8 said: I appreciate the explanation. So you had teachers who also hated free speech, our constitution, and freedom in general. That explains why you and TNT feel the same way all these years later. I would have thought our supposed freedom loving President would have taken steps to eliminate this fascism but alas, here we are. The poor kid who probably has an uncle named Brandon can't even show support for him anymore, and the hopeful future scientist can't show his appreciation for gender studies. Sad. They’re Fing elementary school kids who get away with a hell of a lot more now than we did when I was in elementary school in the early 70s. I had a 5th grade teacher that would l paddle us if we got our pants dirty at recess. In high school boys would get jacked up against the locker if their shirt was untucked when flannel shirts over a concert T was in fashion. There are far worse assaults on our rights than this. So go ahead and reply that I’m the one that’s outraged here while you cray about nothing.
May 4, 20233 yr 2 hours ago, VanHammersly said: Mikemack coming in hot with 'every kid should win a trophy'. Sad
May 4, 20233 yr 2 hours ago, VanHammersly said: Mikemack coming in hot with 'every kid should win a trophy'. Sad It's always the guys that were picked last in gym class that want those.
May 5, 20233 yr https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/covid-19-is-no-longer-a-public-health-emergency-who-says/ar-AA1aMKg3?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=a2e03d0f7c2c4ab984f58d19e0f98ddc&ei=12 COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency, WHO says thank you, President Biden!
Create an account or sign in to comment