July 4, 20232 yr YIKES 49% of registered voters have a negative view of Vice President Kamala Harris, compared to 32% with a positive view, per a new NBC News poll. Why it matters: NBC News says Harris' net-negative rating of -17 is the lowest for a vice president in the history of its poll. Zoom out: In Oct. 2019, 34% had a positive view of then-Vice President Mike Pence, while 38% had a negative view, for a rating of -4, per NBC News. In Dec. 2010, then-Vice President Biden's rating was +1, with 34% having a positive view and 33% having a negative view. Former Vice President Dick Cheney's rating was +23 in May 2003, with 47% of registered voters having a positive view of him, compared to 24% having a negative. In March of 1995, former Vice President Al Gore's rating was +15, with 42% having a positive view and 27% having a negative one. https://www.axios.com/2023/06/26/kamala-harris-poll-2024-election-biden
July 4, 20232 yr People don't get a chance to craft their own opinions anymore. They choose a news network or tribe and then get with the groupthink.
July 4, 20232 yr 9 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: People don't get a chance to craft their own opinions anymore. They choose a news network or tribe and then get with the groupthink. She is the real life version of Selina Meyer
July 4, 20232 yr Yeah Kamala sucks on her own. But the long trend there has been towards negatives on VPs and it coincides with the rise of partisan media.
July 5, 20232 yr 12 hours ago, DaEagles4Life said: YIKES 49% of registered voters have a negative view of Vice President Kamala Harris, compared to 32% with a positive view, per a new NBC News poll. Why it matters: NBC News says Harris' net-negative rating of -17 is the lowest for a vice president in the history of its poll. Zoom out: In Oct. 2019, 34% had a positive view of then-Vice President Mike Pence, while 38% had a negative view, for a rating of -4, per NBC News. In Dec. 2010, then-Vice President Biden's rating was +1, with 34% having a positive view and 33% having a negative view. Former Vice President Dick Cheney's rating was +23 in May 2003, with 47% of registered voters having a positive view of him, compared to 24% having a negative. In March of 1995, former Vice President Al Gore's rating was +15, with 42% having a positive view and 27% having a negative one. https://www.axios.com/2023/06/26/kamala-harris-poll-2024-election-biden Remember when everyone was excited about the first black/Asian/female VP? Well we got that going for us. Maybe pass out more cookies.
July 5, 20232 yr https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/04/judge-limits-biden-administration-contact-with-social-media-firms-00104656 No way, Im stunned the Democrats used covid as a propaganda tool....I never suspected this
July 5, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Mike31mt said: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/04/judge-limits-biden-administration-contact-with-social-media-firms-00104656 No way, Im stunned the Democrats used covid as a propaganda tool....I never suspected this It's too bad this sham ruling from this cultist judge will be overturned. You poor saps had been taking so many L's lately, I'd hate to see you spike the football at the 50 yard line again.
July 5, 20232 yr 23 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: It's too bad this sham ruling from this cultist judge will be overturned. You poor saps had been taking so many L's lately, I'd hate to see you spike the football at the 50 yard line again. Yeah totally, it wasnt completely obvious that they were colluding with social media cites to suppress free speech, bury information that affected the entire planet, and then use it for their political advantage. None of that ever happened at all..... ...Not like anyone mentioned anything exactly like that at the time, and not like you just laughed it off and said "terms of service" like a bootlicker. None of this happened at all and this is just an activist judge.....one of the activist judges you dont like, at least.
July 5, 20232 yr Just now, Mike31mt said: Yeah totally, it wasnt completely obvious that they were colluding with social media cites to suppress free speech, bury information that affected the entire planet, and then use it for their political advantage. None of that ever happened at all..... ...Not like anyone mentioned anything exactly like that at the time, and not like you just laughed it off and said "terms of service" like a bootlicker. None of this happened at all and this is just an activist judge.....one of the activist judges you dont like, at least. Sure it did, sure it did, Mike.
July 5, 20232 yr Mike still thinks there is free speech on social media platforms with TOS that specifically tell you, you do not have free speech there.
July 5, 20232 yr 31 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Mike still thinks there is free speech on social media platforms with TOS that specifically tell you, you do not have free speech there. An unfortunate result of being raised in the dumbest state in the country. Poor fella never had a chance.
July 5, 20232 yr 35 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Mike still thinks there is free speech on social media platforms with TOS that specifically tell you, you do not have free speech there. Lol yeah what happens when the govt interferes with said free speech by colluding with the social media platforms? You guys are dedicated bootlickers, Ill give you that. Tell me about how covid came from a market again....
July 5, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Mike31mt said: Yeah totally, it wasnt completely obvious that they were colluding with social media cites to suppress free speech, bury information that affected the entire planet, and then use it for their political advantage. None of that ever happened at all..... ...Not like anyone mentioned anything exactly like that at the time, and not like you just laughed it off and said "terms of service" like a bootlicker. None of this happened at all and this is just an activist judge.....one of the activist judges you dont like, at least.
July 5, 20232 yr 32 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Lol yeah what happens when the govt interferes with said free speech by colluding with the social media platforms? You guys are dedicated bootlickers, Ill give you that. Tell me about how covid came from a market again.... What free speech? You really are deranged. You have no right to free speech on any social media platform. Even truth social has speech rules. Deal with it buttercup.
July 5, 20232 yr Not sure which thread to post this: have they figured out whose bag of cocaine was at the White House? There’s a 95% chance it was Hunter’s right?
July 5, 20232 yr 4 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said: Not sure which thread to post this: have they figured out whose bag of cocaine was at the White House? There’s a 95% chance it was Hunter’s right? Or somebody found one of Don Jr.'s stashes he forgot about?
July 5, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Toastrel said: Mike still thinks there is free speech on social media platforms with TOS that specifically tell you, you do not have free speech there. Fyi this case isn’t about whether or not a social media platform has the right to regulate speech on their sites. Of course they do. It’s their site. This case is about the federal government allegedly coordinating with those companies and pressuring them to regulate certain speech, which certainly could be a violation of the first amendment.
July 5, 20232 yr 2 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Or somebody found one of Don Jr.'s stashes he forgot about? Lolol no. They found this during a routine sweep of White House. They didn’t somehow not find it for 3 years of routine sweeps and then suddenly found it this time.
July 5, 20232 yr 7 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Uh guys...do you really think there aren't staffers in the West Wing using blow? Maybe, but the blow wasn't found in the West Wing. It was found in an area used by the public. Also when it was found Biden was in Camp David with Hunter. In addition, there have been guests at the Whitehouse who have admitted to using it in the past. So this incident isn't the first time. Snoop dog did a line in the bathroom and smoked a doobie, Willie Nelson also smoked a doobie on the roof and Gary McClain was there wired out of his mind. Surprised, Hunter Biden isn't getting blamed for it.
July 5, 20232 yr 41 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said: Fyi this case isn’t about whether or not a social media platform has the right to regulate speech on their sites. Of course they do. It’s their site. This case is about the federal government allegedly coordinating with those companies and pressuring them to regulate certain speech, which certainly could be a violation of the first amendment. There is no free speech on social media.
July 5, 20232 yr 48 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said: Fyi this case isn’t about whether or not a social media platform has the right to regulate speech on their sites. Of course they do. It’s their site. This case is about the federal government allegedly coordinating with those companies and pressuring them to regulate certain speech, which certainly could be a violation of the first amendment. And what First Amendment rights do the Russian Propagandists at the Troll Farm in Russia, have when they use the Social Media Platform to spread disinformation and lies. seems to me the Government, in order to protect the election, would reach out to the company to make sure they are aware of it and request they take action to prevent/remove it. I see no violation with that.
July 5, 20232 yr 35 minutes ago, Toastrel said: There is no free speech on social media. Once again..........A social media site deciding to regulate speech on their site = OK. a social media site acting as a defacto arm of the federal government to regulate speech at the behest of the federal government = NOT ok and a violation of the first amendment.
July 5, 20232 yr 3 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said: Once again..........A social media site deciding to regulate speech on their site = OK. a social media site acting as a defacto arm of the federal government to regulate speech at the behest of the federal government = NOT ok and a violation of the first amendment. Nope, I have to disagree. I think the government was wrong, but free speech ON TWITTER is not right.
Create an account or sign in to comment