8 minutes ago, Procus said:

Let me frame this another way so you'll understand, hopefully.  None of us were there.  None of us knows what exactly happened.  How the hell can you possibly expect any of us to give you an informed answer to this question.

Are you for real?

Then don’t point a finger at they if you can’t identify they.  I’m not the one placing blame on an unconfirmed and unidentifiable person or persons.  

The hardcore maskers here will be happy to know that Santa is wearing a mask on the NORAD Santa Tracker.

5 hours ago, Boogyman said:

The pandemic didn't start during Bidens admin though. A lot of those plans (like the one Trump had trashed before the pandemic started) you are speaking of needed to be brought into play immediately. I do agree more should have been done when this all started.

It's funny though, I don't remember you complaining "more needs to be done" last spring.

I have trashed both parties the last few years and voted in protest for the 3rd party so try again. 

1 hour ago, Procus said:

I'll do whatever the hell I want to do without direction from a simple minded person such as yourself.

How many of these "theys" are in the room with you right now...?

3 hours ago, DBW said:

I see You still have no answer to the question

I've answered the question multiple times. Your lack of comprehension lies at the feet of your parents and educators.

1 minute ago, lynched1 said:

I've answered the question multiple times. Your lack of comprehension lies at the feet of your parents and educators.

This guy is as dense as they come.  You can discuss with him so far, but at some point, it becomes useless.

1 minute ago, lynched1 said:

I've answered the question multiple times. Your lack of comprehension lies at the feet of your parents and educators.

You really haven’t though. You just keep deflecting.  You have no answers except the ones the qAtard masters give you 

Just now, DBW said:

You really haven’t though. You just keep deflecting.  You have no answers except the ones the qAtard masters give you 

Quit being so Fing childish

1 minute ago, Procus said:

This guy is as dense as they come.  You can discuss with him so far, but at some point, it becomes useless.

Again, deflection. No answers. 

19 minutes ago, DBW said:

Again, deflection. No answers. 

You really have difficulty with basic comprehension.  I will try to explain one more time and that's it.  You're like a child.

There is this thing call circumstantial evidence.  It's competent evidence in a court of law.  It's different than direct evidence.  The circumstances point to Covid being a manmade virus.  It spread in Wuhan where there is a viral lab.  The timing of it came during a very hotly contested presidential election involving a hated president that people wanted to get out of office no matter what it took.   In fact, it significantly impacted the election, including things like massive mail in balloting, along with hampered oversight by minority parties during the tabulation process, which took days in multiple states - all attributable to the virus.

There is no smoking gun.  There are no recordings or writings describing the release of the virus, or creation of Covid 19 in a lab.  In other words, the circumstantial evidence is strong, but there is no direct evidence that any of us are aware of.  Hence, you can ask people until you are blue in the face, and you can moronically claim "deflection", but it won't change the fact that your a dense dimwitted troll who doesn't have the mental capacity to understand these things.

13 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

Quit being so Fing childish

I’m just looking for answers man.  You seem to have it all figured out.  But can’t actually give reasonable explanations for anything.  Small science man bad.  

3 minutes ago, DBW said:

I’m just looking for answers man.  You seem to have it all figured out.  But can’t actually give reasonable explanations for anything.  Small science man bad.  

You're a putz with reading comprehension issues.

7 minutes ago, Procus said:

You really have difficulty with basic comprehension.  I will try to explain one more time and that's it.  You're like a child.

There is this thing call circumstantial evidence.  It's competent evidence in a court of law.  It's different than direct evidence.  The circumstances point to Covid being a manmade virus.  It spread in Wuhan where there is a viral lab.  The timing of it came during a very hotly contested presidential election involving a hated president that people wanted to get out of office no matter what it took. 

There is no smoking gun.  There are no recordings or writings describing the release of the virus, or creation of Covid 19 in a lab.  In other words, the circumstantial evidence is strong, but there is no direct evidence that any of us are aware of.  Hence, you can ask people until you are blue in the face, and you can moronically claim "deflection", but it won't change the fact that your a dense dimwitted troll who doesn't have the mental capacity to understand these things.

So you mean to tell me that "they” whoever "they” are, as we have yet to establish that, orchestrated a man made virus (which I’m not denying it was man made) that affects the entire world population to rig an election?  You realize that the US is only 4% of the worlds population right?  96% of the world didn’t need to suffer through this. "They” could have just put a bullet in the guy "they” wanted out.  But yeah, let’s orchestrate a global pandemic killing 6m people and then very deliberately and systematically rig mail in ballots and voting machines just to be safe. 
 

you’re off your Fing rocker man.  
 

oh and the election is way over.  What are "they” waiting for? Just release the cure and wash the virus down the toilet. 

1 minute ago, DBW said:

you’re off your Fing rocker man.  

Say hi to your brother

1 minute ago, Procus said:

Say hi to your brother

Eat. A. D. 
 

1 hour ago, The_Omega said:

The hardcore maskers here will be happy to know that Santa is wearing a mask on the NORAD Santa Tracker.

We’ll obese people are at higher risks so it’s probably a good idea.

 

I heard next year he’s changing his outfit from red to blue. 

1 hour ago, Procus said:

You really have difficulty with basic comprehension.  I will try to explain one more time and that's it.  You're like a child.

There is this thing call circumstantial evidence.  It's competent evidence in a court of law.  It's different than direct evidence.  The circumstances point to Covid being a manmade virus.  It spread in Wuhan where there is a viral lab.  The timing of it came during a very hotly contested presidential election involving a hated president that people wanted to get out of office no matter what it took.   In fact, it significantly impacted the election, including things like massive mail in balloting, along with hampered oversight by minority parties during the tabulation process, which took days in multiple states - all attributable to the virus.

There is no smoking gun.  There are no recordings or writings describing the release of the virus, or creation of Covid 19 in a lab.  In other words, the circumstantial evidence is strong, but there is no direct evidence that any of us are aware of.  Hence, you can ask people until you are blue in the face, and you can moronically claim "deflection", but it won't change the fact that your a dense dimwitted troll who doesn't have the mental capacity to understand these things.

Even Lionel Hutz would be too embarrassed to make this argument.  

 

1 hour ago, DBW said:

I’m just looking for answers man.  You seem to have it all figured out.  But can’t actually give reasonable explanations for anything.  Small science man bad.  

Lets start with a simple question.

What exactly do you find to be so unreasonable about the explanation?

32 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

 

Lets start with a simple question.

What exactly do you find to be so unreasonable about the explanation?

Because what you’re suggesting (a global conspiracy to steal an American presidency) is right next to the conspiracy to cover up the flat earth in terms of clinical insanity.  You’re flat out crazy if you actually believe that garbage.  

3 hours ago, Procus said:

You really have difficulty with basic comprehension.  I will try to explain one more time and that's it.  You're like a child.

There is this thing call circumstantial evidence.  It's competent evidence in a court of law.  It's different than direct evidence.  The circumstances point to Covid being a manmade virus.  It spread in Wuhan where there is a viral lab.  The timing of it came during a very hotly contested presidential election involving a hated president that people wanted to get out of office no matter what it took.   In fact, it significantly impacted the election, including things like massive mail in balloting, along with hampered oversight by minority parties during the tabulation process, which took days in multiple states - all attributable to the virus.

There is no smoking gun.  There are no recordings or writings describing the release of the virus, or creation of Covid 19 in a lab.  In other words, the circumstantial evidence is strong, but there is no direct evidence that any of us are aware of.  Hence, you can ask people until you are blue in the face, and you can moronically claim "deflection", but it won't change the fact that your a dense dimwitted troll who doesn't have the mental capacity to understand these things.

No neither one of you know who "they" is.  You just keep saying it anyway. 

 

That's pretty funny.

1 hour ago, vikas83 said:

Even Lionel Hutz would be too embarrassed to make this argument.  

Well, it's easy to start any arguement if all you ever do is walk away from it when you corner yourself. That's pretty much this @Procus guys go to move.

3 hours ago, DBW said:

Because what you’re suggesting (a global conspiracy to steal an American presidency) is right next to the conspiracy to cover up the flat earth in terms of clinical insanity.  You’re flat out crazy if you actually believe that garbage.  

There's your first problem

I said nor implied  anything about any election or affiliation. I was speaking merely of the lab leak.

From your distracted response I can see a second problem. Calling what scares you crazy is merely a coping mechanism.

5 hours ago, vikas83 said:

Even Lionel Hutz would be too embarrassed to make this argument.  

Fine - you don't like it.  At least you have the reading comprehension skills (unlike certain others) to understand that its an argument - an opinion based on an observation.  Sadly, there are some on this thread that don't.

Merry Christmas.

 

My youngest was exposed in the office, my niece and nephew both have COVID. The roast is back in the freezer. Even with rapid test kits and N95 masks, it looks like another COVID Christmas.

Ho Ho F