January 25, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Abracadabra said: I thought paco was sufficiently entertain by the previous trips around his circle. You may not be as sophisticated so I'll say it once more for you. The opportunity to make a lot of money is better than the opportunity to make a little money. Generic drugs are not as profitable as drugs under patent. you don't think the price would go up if it were approved as a rona cure?
January 25, 20224 yr Just now, mr_hunt said: you don't think the price would go up if it were approved as a rona cure? No. At least not appreciably. Anyone can make it. Besides, the gap in potential profits massive.
January 25, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Abracadabra said: I thought paco was sufficiently entertained by the previous trips around his circle. You may not be as sophisticated so I'll say it once more for you. The opportunity to make a lot of money is better than the opportunity to make a little money. Generic drugs are not as profitable as drugs under patent. The opportunity to make some money is better than making none. Generic drugs are more profitable than non existent drugs. I didn't expect a clear direct answer though. You Q folks tend to talk around the issues.
January 25, 20224 yr 5 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: i think he's the same doode that claimed 45,000 deaths within 2 weeks of getting "the jab"...when that number is actually the same as the expected death rates of the population...or some malarkey like that. renz is no joe probiotic...that's fo sho! "with" the jab or "from" the jab? 4 minutes ago, Paul852 said: I feel like kz enjoys faceplanting and here I am giving him the attention he craves. You've done well today. You already challenged yourself more than I imagined any ishlib in here could by answering what you have so far. So, good job.
January 25, 20224 yr 3 minutes ago, Abracadabra said: I thought paco was sufficiently entertained by the previous trips around his circle. You may not be as sophisticated so I'll say it once more for you. The opportunity to make a lot of money is better than the opportunity to make a little money. Generic drugs are not as profitable as drugs under patent. So you believe that Merck is suppressing ivermectin (which you believe is superior) in lieu of a more expensive drug which has a lousy efficacy and rough side effects. And you believe that is because of $$$ Why would people take something that is basically worthless and more expensive over something that is cheap and superior? Sounds like a terrible business plan to push the expensive, ineffective drug.
January 25, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, Kz! said: You've done well today. You already challenged yourself more than I imagined any ishlib in here could by answering what you have so far. So, good job. Thanks bud. I wonder if the Gin Blossoms are touring.
January 25, 20224 yr 10 minutes ago, paco said: So you believe that Merck is suppressing ivermectin (which you believe is superior) in lieu of a more expensive drug which has a lousy efficacy and rough side effects. And you believe that is because of $$$ Why would people take something that is basically worthless and more expensive over something that is cheap and superior? Sounds like a terrible business plan to push the expensive, ineffective drug. Because that's what the Pope is directing them to do. And the Pope gets what the Pope wants.
January 25, 20224 yr Amazing amount of support against government medical tyranny in Canada. This is fantastic:
January 25, 20224 yr 18 minutes ago, paco said: Why would people take something that is basically worthless and more expensive over something that is cheap and superior? Sounds like a terrible business plan to push the expensive, ineffective drug. Maybe because the cheap alternative is suppressed. Maybe because the government has a deal with the pharmaceutical cartels to purchase the expensive, ineffective, dangerous crap. Shall we go again?
January 25, 20224 yr Demonic. And the people who fling around terms like "ghoul" if someone cites data in a post whole-heartedly support it.
January 25, 20224 yr 3 minutes ago, Kz! said: Demonic. And the people who fling around terms like "ghoul" if someone cites data in a post whole-heartedly support it. Happens all the time. You give the organ to the most viable patient. That's life. Choices have consequences.
January 25, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Happens all the time. You give the organ to the most viable patient. That's life. Choices have consequences. Exactly. Alcoholics don’t get new livers and meth junkies don’t get new teeth. You’re not "father of two” on the medical chart, you’re "patient 39740” with a MEDICAL score, not a MORAL or PUBLIC OPINION score.
January 25, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Happens all the time. You give the organ to the most viable patient. That's life. Choices have consequences. What's next? We won't give liver transplants to alcoholics? These demonic practices need to stop. This is America and we have the freedom to be given organs when we demand them, damnit!
January 25, 20224 yr 8 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Happens all the time. You give the organ to the most viable patient. That's life. Choices have consequences. Paul, there's really no reason to do this. It's as transparent as the Aaron Rodgers thing from the other night.
January 25, 20224 yr Just now, Kz! said: Paul, there's really no reason to do this. It's as transparent as the Aaron Rodgers thing from the other night. Transplant patients are more susceptible to COVID. Those are facts. I know you don't like facts. You ignoring facts is almost as automatic as Aaron Rodgers losing at home in the playoffs.
January 25, 20224 yr 23 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Happens all the time. You give the organ to the most viable patient. That's life. Choices have consequences. You should have waited for him to post that five more times before replying.
January 25, 20224 yr 23 minutes ago, Abracadabra said: Maybe because the cheap alternative is suppressed. Maybe because the government has a deal with the pharmaceutical cartels to purchase the expensive, ineffective, dangerous crap. Shall we go again? So you believe the government is telling Merck not to push its drug, which you believe is very effective, because it is cheap?
January 25, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, paco said: So you believe the government is telling Merck not to push its drug, which you believe is very effective, because it is cheap? Yes. As I stated from the beginning, the government, along with media, labs, academia, has been captured by the pharmaceutical cartels. Old fashioned corruption.
January 25, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said: Hey @The_Omega this right here^ is what a ghoul looks like. Yet you never call him out and instead direct your anger at me for bringing attention to the severity of a dangerous virus. Ask yourself why that is. I’m not the arbiter of who’s ghoulish, and who isn’t. That’s a personal choice. I would question whether or not recognizing the great sacrifice that women make to have their children fits the definition though.
January 25, 20224 yr 8 minutes ago, The_Omega said: I’m not the arbiter of who’s ghoulish, and who isn’t. That’s a personal choice. I would question whether or not recognizing the great sacrifice that women make to have their children fits the definition though. Interesting stance for a guy who throws the term around as often as you do.
January 25, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Interesting stance for a guy who throws the term around as often as you do. Just because I recognize it, doesn’t mean I assign it. Same with pronouns. If you want to be she/her, be that. I will respect your choice and supportively recognize it.
January 25, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, The_Omega said: Just because I recognize it, doesn’t mean I assign it. Same with pronouns. If you want to be she/her, be that. I will respect your choice and supportively recognize it. "I'm not the arbiter of who's a ghoul or not, I'm just gonna throw the term around whenever I feel like it but never on those that actually deserve it."
January 25, 20224 yr Transplant recipient decisions are based on viability factors, availability of organs, and urgency of need all factored into a scoring system. It's about as impersonal a decision as there is in medicine.
Create an account or sign in to comment