Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, DiPros said:

This I believe could work.  I do pay higher premium for life insurance since I cannot stay smoke free for an entire year, which is when you are considered QUIT

And that's your choice to make, which I fully support. I used to smoke too. And I should have been charged more for health insurance because of it.

  • Replies 37.9k
  • Views 1.4m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Captain F
    Captain F

    Im home! Pulse ox on room air in the mid 90s. Feeling much better! Thank you for all of the well wishes.  I tested negative on Thursday and again this morning.  F u covid, you can suck muh deek

  • Captain F
    Captain F

    Hey everyone.  Im still in the hospital.  No ventilator.  No visitors.  Breathing treatments multiple times a day. Chest xrays every other day. Pulse oxygen is 89% with a nonrebreather mask running fu

  • Update  Surgery was a success. Mom has been home since this afternoon. Some pain, but good otherwise and they got the entire tumor.  Thanks all for the well wishes and prayers. 

Posted Images

1 hour ago, DiPros said:

Thank you!   Sent this info to my daughter.  She's an educator and will be up next even before me, so I can't say I did it so can you!

She's just afraid of it I think, so thank you for especially for the Emily Oster article that explains how the mRna works.

Of course!  Emily Oster is a personal favorite of mine.  She has some videos out there as well if that helps.

2 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

And that's your choice to make, which I fully support. I used to smoke too. And I should have been charged more for health insurance because of it.

People who pay premiums and never file a claim, yes I feel they should be rewarded.  I think one auto insurer does this

1 minute ago, vikas83 said:

And that's your choice to make, which I fully support. I used to smoke too. And I should have been charged more for health insurance because of it.

This is the classic topic of where one can draw the lines. Of course one could assert that there shouldn't be any lines at all.

For example, in the car insurance market females used to get lower rates because they were females.  I'm not sure if that is still ok in the US.  If one gender/race/age/whatever has a lesser need for health care should the cost for them be less for any variable or is there a set of variables which cannot be used to set price?

5 minutes ago, DiPros said:

This I believe could work.  I do pay higher premium for life insurance since I cannot stay smoke free for an entire year, which is when you are considered QUIT

at my current & previous employers, smokers do pay a higher premium for health insurance. the previous employer even had a smoking cessation plan to help ee's get off the cigs. 

Just now, DrPhilly said:

This is the classic topic of where one can draw the lines. Of course one could assert that there shouldn't be any lines at all.

For example, in the car insurance market females used to get lower rates because they were females.  I'm not sure if that is still ok in the US.  If one gender/race/age/whatever has a lesser need for health care should the cost for them be less for any variable or is there a set of variables which cannot be used to set price?

I am fine with no line, but that won't work. IMO, race shouldn't be a factor, despite the fact that there are differences. Gender is fair game, however, and does impact health insurance premiums. Men don't get pregnant, and women of child bearing age pay more. Age should 100% be fair game -- older people should pay more.

Just now, vikas83 said:

I am fine with no line, but that won't work. IMO, race shouldn't be a factor, despite the fact that there are differences. Gender is fair game, however, and does impact health insurance premiums. Men don't get pregnant, and women of child bearing age pay more. Age should 100% be fair game -- older people should pay more.

Why should gender be a factor but not race?

9 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

So then we just act like their will be consequences for bad life decisions until there are actual consequences? So we are the parent that keeps threatening to take away the iPad, but then never follows through. That works out well.

Like I said, I get where you coming from, but I'm just not sure if it applies to this particular event.  If the message is that you can be unhealthy and you'll live through a once-in-a-century pandemic, then I'm not sure it really matters that that lesson will be learned, since it'll never happen to them again.  

6 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Why should gender be a factor but not race?

I have no problem with race being a factor, as I wrote. I am just accepting the political reality.

auto insurance companies use statistical analysis of claims to formulate their premiums, no?  

23 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

You don't seem to understand that explaining the why/how about something isn't the same thing as defending it.

Should Sweden have mandated masks in all indoor public spaces before October?

9 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

Like I said, I get where you coming from, but I'm just not sure if it applies to this particular event.  If the message is that you can be unhealthy and you'll live through a once-in-a-century pandemic, then I'm not sure it really matters that that lesson will be learned, since it'll never happen to them again.  

Anyone else surprised Van is pushing back hard on Vikas's idea that fat people should pay more for health insurance? 

Me neither. :roll: 

2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

auto insurance companies use statistical analysis of claims to formulate their premiums, no?  

Yes, which is why younger males pay more. Health insurance companies do much less of it. But the biggest factor for health insurers is obesity, which they don't take into account. There should be an obesity surcharge.

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

Anyone else surprised Van is pushing back hard on Vikas's idea that fat people should pay more for health insurance? 

Me neither. :roll: 

 

giphy-2.gif

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

Anyone else surprised Van is pushing back hard on Vikas's idea that fat people should pay more for health insurance? 

Me neither. :roll: 

First round of vaccines - healthcare and frontline workers

Second round of vaccines - those that get winded climbing a set of stairs

49 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

This is legitimately insane. Let's prioritize those that have made poor life choices and taken no responsibility for their health. This ties into the discussion on entitlements -- when you remove people from the consequences of their bad decisions, you get more bad decisions. This is even worse -- let's REWARD people for being irresponsible. 

 

#FATLIVESMATTER

I take it your polos aren't XXXL.  :roll:

I've established that since I'm a middle-aged white guy who is in good health and not a front line worker I'm last in line to get the vaccine.

12 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

I have no problem with race being a factor, as I wrote. I am just accepting the political reality.

Ok, right.  Gender will be ok politically if males have to pay more but I don't think it will be accepted if females or other have to pay more.

8 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

Yes, which is why younger males pay more. Health insurance companies do much less of it. But the biggest factor for health insurers is obesity, which they don't take into account. There should be an obesity surcharge.

agreed. it should work the same way as auto insurance. how obese are we talking though?  :unsure:  

2 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Ok, right.  Gender will be ok politically if males have to pay more but I don't think it will be accepted if females or other have to pay more.

You really struggle with reading comprehension. I already wrote that women do pay more when they are of child bearing age. People accept it because it has always been that way.

Being an old lady (almost) now, older people DO pay more.  Remember just the art of aging is increasing your risk of multiple health issues.  I have spent/paid ALOT on medical.  This is my 1st year of opening  an FSA.  Never had to do that before.  

1 minute ago, mr_hunt said:

agreed. it should work the same way as auto insurance. how obese are we talking though?  :unsure:  

It should be up to the insurance company. I'd personally look at the relationship between BMI and health outcomes, and maybe set it at anything over 30, which is defined as obese.

BMI 25 or under is the goal. Normal

5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Ok, right.  Gender will be ok politically if males have to pay more but I don't think it will be accepted if females or other have to pay more.

women already get a break on car insurance. let them pay more for heath insurance. :lol:  

srsly, i might be dead wrong but it seems like women have a sheetload more medial appointments than men...fwiw. 

1 minute ago, mr_hunt said:

women already get a break on car insurance. let them pay more for heath insurance. :lol:  

srsly, i might be dead wrong but it seems like women have a sheetload more medial appointments than men...fwiw. 

Why the hell do the worst drivers get breaks?  I did not know this.  I just figured there was an asian lady over 50 surcharge of $10k.

13 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Should Sweden have mandated masks in all indoor public spaces before October?

As a central strong general recommendation yes but not a general central policy mandated everywhere no.  We rely on the recommended policies which I think are good enough here though that might not work in some countries/regions.  Some establishments require a mask though to come in which is fine with me.  Also, I'd support a mandate for any public space that can't enforce distancing.  I'd also support a mandate generally for regions of outbreak above a certain threshold (don't know what that threshold is per se).

btw - When you say "mandate" is there any teeth behind it?  Fines? etc.  For it to be an actual "mandate" I'd expect actual enforced fines and not just $10.  Say $500 minimum as was done in Spain/France.  Get some teeth in there or the "mandat" aspect is worthless and you're far better off with a recommendation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.