7 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

Hunt reporting to work with his new "I was vaccinated" badge

    you f'er!!!   

50 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Now factor in blood clotting and accidental paralysis into your numbers. 

Yes.

How about you provide the data since you're the one trying to make the claim that it's better to not get the vaccination...... you know, show your work....

EEOC says employers can mandate vaccination for those that work in the office. 
 

 

My employer required proof of vaccinations before they allow employees working from home to return to work.  I'm sure it's common for a lot of employers to do the same. 

 

Those who are vaccinated will tell truth. Those who are not vaccinated will lie about it. Especially, when going to a restaurant or market etc. where those who are not vaccinated are still required to wear a mask. 

On 5/14/2021 at 6:08 PM, Imp81318 said:

Incidence Rate & PCR Rate for my county the last few weeks:

4/16 - 119.6 / 6.5%

4/23 - 116.4 / 6.3%

4/30 - 91.6 / 5.3%

5/7 - 94.7 / 5.3%

5/14 - 51.7 / 3.7%

 

5/21 - 43 / 3.9%

5/28 - 28.4 / 3.8%

1 hour ago, Phillyterp85 said:

How about you provide the data since you're the one trying to make the claim that it's better to not get the vaccination...... you know, show your work....

Lmao yeah no thanks 

31 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Lmao yeah no thanks 

lmao yeah figured, as usual you have no clue as to what you are talking about. 

some people think this is how the maths work:

• An explosive new study claims researchers found 'unique fingerprints' in COVID-19 samples that they say could only have arisen from manipulation in a laboratory
• DailyMail.com exclusively obtained the new 22-page paper authored by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen set to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery
• The study showed there's evidence to suggest Chinese scientists created the virus while working on a Gain of Function project in a Wuhan lab 
• Gain of Function research, which was temporarily outlawed in the US, involves altering naturally-occurring viruses to make them more infectious in order to study their potential effects on humans 
• According to the paper, Chinese scientists took a natural coronavirus 'backbone' found in Chinese cave bats and spliced onto it a new 'spike', turning it into the deadly and highly transmissible COVID-19
• The researchers, who concluded that COVID-19 'has no credible natural ancestor', also believe scientists reverse-engineered versions of the virus to cover up their tracks
• 'We think that there have been retro-engineered viruses created,' Dalgleish told DailyMail.com. 'They've changed the virus, then tried to make out it was in a sequence years ago.'
• The study also points to 'deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data' in Chinese labs and notes that 'scientists who wished to share their findings haven't been able to do so or have disappeared' 
• Until recently, most experts had staunchly denied the origins of the virus were anything other than a natural infection leaping from animals to humans
   

5 hours ago, Kz! said:

Lmao yeah no thanks 

How is it possible for you to be the biggest moron in every single thread? 

7 hours ago, jsdarkstar said:

Those who are vaccinated will tell truth. Those who are not vaccinated will lie about it. Especially, when going to a restaurant or market etc. where those who are not vaccinated are still required to wear a mask. 

You don't have to lie. No one is going to say a word. 😉

14 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

some people think this is how the maths work:

I see that the resident flat earth "jenius" "liked" this.

Ok, 445k deaths among 25.3m people is not 0.02%. it's 2%. Which is inline with the case fatality rate globally.

Divide it by the whole population and it's 0.14%. 

The moron above did simple division then quoted it as a straight percentage. Because they're an idiot.

And fwiw deaths are now at 594k. About 0.18% of the population, or 1 in 555, have died. A number that would have been much higher had we just ignored the pandemic like some seem to believe we should have.

15 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

some people think this is how the maths work:

There's nothing wrong with the math, however, the next to last sentence should have been written as "So the US has lost .00134% if it's population due to COVID-19". 

The biggest problem with the math is the 445,264 deaths, I'm sure everyone knows by now the books were severly cooked and that number is much lower, just as the number of deaths due to the vaccinations are much higher.  

WAKE UP AMERICA!! 

Just now, EagleVA said:

There's nothing wrong with the math, however, the next to last sentence should have been written as "So the US has lost .00134% if it's population due to COVID-19". 

The biggest problem with the math is the 445,264 deaths, I'm sure everyone knows by now the books were severly cooked and that number is much lower, just as the number of deaths due to the vaccinations are much higher.  

WAKE UP AMERICA!! 

Exhibit A for idiocy.

14 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

I see that the resident flat earth "jenius" "liked" this.

I hope you see I deleted my Like, I didn't know you had an issue with the math.

Just now, EagleVA said:

I hope you see I deleted my Like, I didn't know you had an issue with the math.

Because the math is wrong.

Just now, JohnSnowsHair said:

Exhibit A for idiocy.

You'r speaking with a Math Major.

Just now, EagleVA said:

You'r speaking with a Math Major.

Oh god, did you go to Ohio State too?

Tell me, what percent of 100 is 100?

By the math above.. 100/100 = 1. So.. 1%.

That right Mr math major?

8 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

You'r speaking with a Math Major.

Holy ish!

10 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

You'r speaking with a Math Major.

This definitely explains why any calculations you do show you the Earth is flat.

16 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Tell me, what percent of 100 is 100?

By the math above.. 100/100 = 1. So.. 1%.

That right Mr math major?

Yeah, I didn't check his math, I assumed it was correct, it was his conclusion that I had an issue with.  

His .02 should have been 1.76 and his .00134 should have been .134.

2 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

Yeah, I didn't check his math, I assumed it was correct, it was his conclusion that I had an issue with.  

His .02 should have been 1.76 and his .00134 should have been .134.

Yeah, that makes a pretty big difference in the final assessment doesn't it math major?

56 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

Yeah, I didn't check his math, I assumed it was correct, it was his conclusion that I had an issue with.  

His .02 should have been 1.76 and his .00134 should have been .134.

 

1 hour ago, EagleVA said:

There's nothing wrong with the math, however, the next to last sentence should have been written as "So the US has lost .00134% if it's population due to COVID-19". 

The biggest problem with the math is the 445,264 deaths, I'm sure everyone knows by now the books were severly cooked and that number is much lower, just as the number of deaths due to the vaccinations are much higher.  

WAKE UP AMERICA!! 

I call BS.