7 hours ago, EaglesRocker97 said:

Just did my first brain swab. That was unpleasant.

They're saying the nasal swab is a vaccination.

You can find documents from John Hopkins explaining the technology.

1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Not sure what emails you're referring to, but there are plenty of studies on it. Some kids can tolerate them while others struggle a bit more so you can only do so much, especially if they're younger. My kids will be wearing them indoors in public until they're vaxxed.

Emails Fauci sent last year to important people, not us sheep, where he said cloth masks are basically useless and not to wear them.  That was early on though, before it became a political war.  
 

I do think masks help. I’m being a bit sarcastic because now that the mandates are lifted suddenly 80% of the world is vaccinated (who’s to say otherwise?) so it’s back to where we were a year ago basically.  Most people aren’t going to wear them, those of us with younger kids will be more likely to mask them up. But their level of protection is anyone’s guess based on the fact that there will be unvaxxed people all over.  Essentially we Gotta assume everyone is infected again.  Fun

6 hours ago, EagleVA said:

They're saying the nasal swab is a vaccination.

You can find documents from John Hopkins explaining the technology.

If they can vaccinate you with a swab, why bother with the time sensitive injections? Why not just swab everyone who wants the vaccine?  And are the swabs kept in cold storage and require a timely thaw out?

9 hours ago, EagleVA said:

They're saying the nasal swab is a vaccination.

You can find documents from John Hopkins explaining the technology.

Ah, "they" - ooh, and a they who cured cancer! Wow!!

Does she not own a microscope to show us the nanoparticles?

More stellar science here folks!!

30 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Ah, "they" - ooh, and a they who cured cancer! Wow!!

Does she not own a microscope to show us the nanoparticles?

More stellar science here folks!!

There are many photos of the nano particles on the swab, I just wanted something short and sweet for those of you that can't tolerate researchng anything for more than 3 minutes.

As for cancer, do you really thing the big pharma wants to wipe out their cash cow?

Here's the solution to cancer that big pharma labeled quackery because they can't get a patent on it.

4 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

There are many photos of the nano particles on the swab, I just wanted something short and sweet for those of you that can't tolerate researchng anything for more than 3 minutes.

As for cancer, do you really thing the big pharma wants to wipe out their cash cow?

Here's the solution to cancer that big pharma labeled quackery because they can't get a patent on it.

Lol. Of course it a YouTube link. Rent must be due, gotta rack up those hits.

10 hours ago, matchew88 said:

The entire purpose was to learn about viruses to be able to respond quickly. On top of that, they had inside information on the structure of the virus, which would have allowed for a quicker vaccine. But addressing it would imply beforehand knowledge, pointing to man-made leak.

I know you all are simps for the one-eyed monster fluid coming out of Democrat liar's mouths, but this is the perspective-

They chose plausible deniability over the lives of millions of people. ZeroHedge even had emails saying there were HIV inserts in the virus. You know who worked on the HIV virus in the 80s and pushed the poisonous treatment that killed thousands of people? I'll let you guess, since you don't actually look, but rather get your "truth" from your favorite funhouse mirror news outlet.

Chew on some hydroxychloroquine, mainline some bleach, and chill out dude. 

I haven't looked at this thread in two weeks. What the hell happened in here. 

13 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said:

A forthcoming book about Dr. Anthony Fauci has been removed from Amazon and Barnes & Noble after it was accidentally posted for pre-sale prematurely.

Seriously, is there anyone dumber than you in existence? I submit that there is not.

 

Obviously the answer is no.

Some pretty damning stuff in this Twitter thread and article regarding the lab leak theory.

 

42 minutes ago, Dawkins 20 said:

Some pretty damning stuff in this Twitter thread and article regarding the lab leak theory.

 

Very well written article and a great read for the most part until the 11th paragraph where it goes off the rails. It's fine that they omitted the Chinese CDC later conceding the wuhan market was not the origin earlier in the article. To then omit that Baric signed the SciMag letter while still publicly stating he believes a zoonotic origin is most likely is very questionable, but it's blatantly false when paired with the statement below...

 

Among the signers was Ralph Baric. Fifteen months earlier, he had worked behind the scenes to help Peter Daszak stage-manage the Lancet statement. The scientific consensus had been smashed to smithereens

Lock him up:

 

Is the new case of bird flu in China brought up yet?

54 minutes ago, Dawkins 20 said:

Some pretty damning stuff in this Twitter thread and article regarding the lab leak theory.

 

Now that's some good journalism.

 

3 hours ago, EagleVA said:

There are many photos of the nano particles on the swab, I just wanted something short and sweet for those of you that can't tolerate researchng anything for more than 3 minutes.

As for cancer, do you really thing the big pharma wants to wipe out their cash cow?

Here's the solution to cancer that big pharma labeled quackery because they can't get a patent on it.

How does anyone stay gainfully employed when they spend their entire day watching our long videos on youtube.

so our stupid-a$$ school board got very political over the last few weeks.

a couple weeks back, as the most recent regular school board meeting was drawing to a close, one of the "Trump-butthurt" members made a motion to change the leadership. This was a "surprise" to at least some of the board, but it passed of course because they had prepared to do so beforehand. 

the big deal there is that the board leadership can call emergency sessions. which they did, for last night.

after a bunch of fugging morons spoke, many of whom don't even have kids in the district, about things like "masks are child abuse"  the board voted to lift the mask mandate for ALL students for the last 5 days of school next week.

this actually goes against the state's policy, so I don't even believe they have the authority to lift this. but I doubt there's time between now and monday for that to matter, which is exactly what this power grab was designed to do.

so they perform a hostile takeover of board leadership, ram through a change that impacts ALL students, including those who are at risk, all to override the mask mandate for five frigging days. 

these people are idiots, and I see this coming back to bite them in November. that of course depends on the voters, but we'll see. 

I'm debating just pulling our kids for the last week. not that I'm overly concerned about COVID, just to protest stupidity.

7 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

so our stupid-a$$ school board got very political over the last few weeks.

a couple weeks back, as the most recent regular school board meeting was drawing to a close, one of the "Trump-butthurt" members made a motion to change the leadership. This was a "surprise" to at least some of the board, but it passed of course because they had prepared to do so beforehand. 

the big deal there is that the board leadership can call emergency sessions. which they did, for last night.

after a bunch of fugging morons spoke, many of whom don't even have kids in the district, about things like "masks are child abuse"  the board voted to lift the mask mandate for ALL students for the last 5 days of school next week.

this actually goes against the state's policy, so I don't even believe they have the authority to lift this. but I doubt there's time between now and monday for that to matter, which is exactly what this power grab was designed to do.

so they perform a hostile takeover of board leadership, ram through a change that impacts ALL students, including those who are at risk, all to override the mask mandate for five frigging days. 

these people are idiots, and I see this coming back to bite them in November. that of course depends on the voters, but we'll see. 

I'm debating just pulling our kids for the last week. not that I'm overly concerned about COVID, just to protest stupidity.

I would

44 minutes ago, downundermike said:

 

How does anyone stay gainfully employed when they spend their entire day watching our long videos on youtube.

With whom are you making these long videos, sir?

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

With whom are you making these long videos, sir?

 

2 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Criticize him all you want, but if you're spending just as much time making them as he is watching them, you're just as bad. 

28 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

so our stupid-a$$ school board got very political over the last few weeks.

a couple weeks back, as the most recent regular school board meeting was drawing to a close, one of the "Trump-butthurt" members made a motion to change the leadership. This was a "surprise" to at least some of the board, but it passed of course because they had prepared to do so beforehand. 

the big deal there is that the board leadership can call emergency sessions. which they did, for last night.

after a bunch of fugging morons spoke, many of whom don't even have kids in the district, about things like "masks are child abuse"  the board voted to lift the mask mandate for ALL students for the last 5 days of school next week.

this actually goes against the state's policy, so I don't even believe they have the authority to lift this. but I doubt there's time between now and monday for that to matter, which is exactly what this power grab was designed to do.

so they perform a hostile takeover of board leadership, ram through a change that impacts ALL students, including those who are at risk, all to override the mask mandate for five frigging days. 

these people are idiots, and I see this coming back to bite them in November. that of course depends on the voters, but we'll see. 

I'm debating just pulling our kids for the last week. not that I'm overly concerned about COVID, just to protest stupidity.

Kids without masks for an entire 5 days! The horror! 

  

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

 

Criticize him all you want, but if you're spending just as much time making them as he is watching them, you're just as bad. 

My point was, how does he stay gainfully employed when he spends his entire life watching hour plus long conspiracy theory videos.  Some of the flat earth video links he posts are 2 plus hours long.

10 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Kids without masks for an entire 5 days! The horror! 

  

Solid comment/advice.  I think we're all interested in your opinions about how we raise our children.

26 minutes ago, Gannan said:

I would

The question we have is about the kids. The risk is low, though non-zero if course. But risk is part of life. And I don't want to pull the kids and have them miss their last week of school with friends.

On the other hand, these idiot parents (and non-parents) actually created a PAC to get this done. They dedicated the last few months of their sorry lives working to get one week of a dropped mandate in our district. 

They're pathetic.

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

Solid comment/advice. 

That wasn't advice. Are you illiterate?

2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

I think we're all interested in your opinions about we raise our children.

Oh, I see. 🥴