The Warriors have shown interest in Hawks guard Bogdan Bogdanovic, sources said. – via Shams Charania @ The Athletic

Another name I mentioned before that could fit in. 

6 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

The Warriors have shown interest in Hawks guard Bogdan Bogdanovic, sources said. – via Shams Charania @ The Athletic

Another name I mentioned before that could fit in. 

Meanwhile in Camden 

1 hour ago, Khani1 said:

What about Jeremy Grant? 

Grant, Nance, or Markkanen are the ideal stretch 4.

 

 

7 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Grant, Nance, or Markkanen are the ideal stretch 4.

 

Markkanen is likely the one with the most upside but you likely have to give up maxey and a first if not more. He is also up for a new contract which is fine cause i think he’s a perfect fit but could try to use your trade exception for markkanen as he’s  making 6.7 mil 

 

I think you are taking Harris out of his position where he is successful with Lauri 

43 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Markkanen is likely the one with the most upside but you likely have to give up maxey and a first if not more. He is also up for a new contract which is fine cause i think he’s a perfect fit but could try to use your trade exception for markkanen as he’s  making 6.7 mil 

 

I like him,  but I prefer Nance or Grant.

Laurie to me is almost your traditional 4, who can shoot 3s. But mainly is your typical big who can only defend his position.

I prefer Nance or Grant because they're almost like big SFs. Give more versatility. 

I'll be happy with any of the 3, but prefer the other 2.

26 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I like him,  but I prefer Nance or Grant.

Laurie to me is almost your traditional 4, who can shoot 3s. But mainly is your typical big who can only defend his position.

I prefer Nance or Grant because they're almost like big SFs. Give more versatility. 

I'll be happy with any of the 3, but prefer the other 2.

I like markkanen more simply cause he’s younger and i feel he still has more upside to reach his ceiling. He’s 23. Grant is 27 and nance 28. I think they are what they are. I like grant i think he is putting up better numbers than he would if he was on a better team. His career year makes his value through the roof for the pistons. It makes markkanen compared to grant more obtainable.

I know from what some of the Arizona coaches have told me he feels the bulls coaching has been underwhelming since he got there and if he was surrounded by more than Lavine he’d flourish more. I do think with embiid he’s capable of stretching it. He can shoot the 3. He’s hitting 40.1 percent this year. I think doc would get the most out of him. I know at Arizona he played a lot of 3 and 4. With the bulls more 4 but i do think he’s capable athletically of playing the 3. He’s not going to be a great defender at either. But scoring wise i think he can be a bogdonavic in how the jazz use him but more athletic 

19 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I like markkanen more simply cause he’s younger and i feel he still has more upside to reach his ceiling. He’s 23. Grant is 27 and nance 28. I think they are what they are. I like grant i think he is putting up better numbers than he would if he was on a better team. His career year makes his value through the roof for the pistons. It makes markkanen compared to grant more obtainable.

I know from what some of the Arizona coaches have told me he feels the bulls coaching has been underwhelming since he got there and if he was surrounded by more than Lavine he’d flourish more. I do think with embiid he’s capable of stretching it. He can shoot the 3. He’s hitting 40.1 percent this year. I think doc would get the most out of him. I know at Arizona he played a lot of 3 and 4. With the bulls more 4 but i do think he’s capable athletically of playing the 3. He’s not going to be a great defender at either. But scoring wise i think he can be a bogdonavic in how the jazz use him but more athletic 

Im good with him. But I think Nance is the right mix of obtainability, and versatility. Grant is going to be more expensive. Markkanen may be the cheapest, but a little lest versatile. I think Nance will be better defensively. 

In the end give me any of them and Morey gets an A+. 

6 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Im good with him. But I think Nance is the right mix of obtainability, and versatility. Grant is going to be more expensive. Markkanen may be the cheapest, but a little lest versatile. I think Nance will be better defensively. 

In the end give me any of them and Morey gets an A+. 

I think the bigger issue in acquiring markkanen is he’s up for an extension. I’d extend him and if need be down the line trade him if i needed to in a deal. I think the added value is let’s say the wizards put beal (or another star) on the trade market i think markkanen along with Simmons is much more appealing as both are younger

don’t get me wrong I’d be happy with any. I think grant based off what Keith smith from yahoo said the pistons are asking for way too much for grant. I think it comes down to nance and markkanen as more realistic. 

markkanen is soft af & can't create at all....right?     

2021 1st rounder -unprotected

2021 - 2nd round from knicks

2022 1st round swap

2023 1st round - unprotected 

1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said:

I like him,  but I prefer Nance or Grant.

Laurie to me is almost your traditional 4, who can shoot 3s. But mainly is your typical big who can only defend his position.

I prefer Nance or Grant because they're almost like big SFs. Give more versatility. 

I'll be happy with any of the 3, but prefer the other 2.

Grant should be option one because he is also a really good defender and can play multiple roles ala lead scorer or 3rd option. 

1 hour ago, mr_hunt said:

markkanen is soft af & can't create at all....right?     

I’ll take soft if he’s gonna average 18-6-1 and shoot 40 percent from 3. 

 

That’s nice 

 

7 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I think the bigger issue in acquiring markkanen is he’s up for an extension. I’d extend him and if need be down the line trade him if i needed to in a deal. I think the added value is let’s say the wizards put beal (or another star) on the trade market i think markkanen along with Simmons is much more appealing as both are younger

don’t get me wrong I’d be happy with any. I think grant based off what Keith smith from yahoo said the pistons are asking for way too much for grant. I think it comes down to nance and markkanen as more realistic. 

Beal will only be 28 this off season. 

40 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Beal will only be 28 this off season. 

I was talking about Simmons and markkanen would both be 25 and 24 

2 days left for Morey to do a thing

15 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I’ll take soft if he’s gonna average 18-6-1 and shoot 40 percent from 3. 

he won't average 18 as the 3rd or 4th option on philly....and how much will he be exploited on d? 

idk...i'm not big on him at all. 

8 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I was talking about Simmons and markkanen would both be 25 and 24 

But 28 is young and just hitting his prime if could get him without trading Simmons 

[Windhorst] Kyle Lowry's free agency is happening right now. The expectation is that Kyle Lowry is going to have a new contract by the end of this week. It's either going to be to stay in Toronto or it's going to be Miami or it's going to be Philadelphia.

I'd love to get Lowry. Not sure I'm going to love the contract it will require. 

If we don't land him that's OK imo but I hope there is a quick pivot. Gotta do something. 

 

 

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

I'd love to get Lowry. Not sure I'm going to love the contract it will require. 

If we don't land him that's OK imo but I hope there is a quick pivot. Gotta do something. 

 

 

How much longer is a 35-year-old going to make an impact?  Year or two? Wrong move with the assets they would have to give up.

10 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I'd love to get Lowry. Not sure I'm going to love the contract it will require. 

If we don't land him that's OK imo but I hope there is a quick pivot. Gotta do something. 

 

 

I am good with trading/re-signing Lowry as long as Thybulle is not part of the trade package.