16 minutes ago, FTheCowboys said:

Reagor looks really good in games to me, but I can see why people have concerns about him. He just looks explosive and I think it’ll translate.

He's Steve Smith and his attitude would be a nice change compared to Nelson's ho hum mindset the past few years.

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

Haha seriously? God this guy is just an attention seeking ****. 

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

 

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

I wonder how dumb the Bucs are ..... 

3 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

I wonder if Patriots would do a OJ Howard swap with TB

Just now, Alphagrand said:

I wonder how dumb the Bucs are ..... 

If Jason Licht has anything to do with it, very

Does anyone have Dane Brugler's WR rankings?

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

I wonder if Patriots would do a OJ Howard swap with TB

If Jason Licht has anything to do with it, very

That's what Pat Kirwan was speculating on a couple of days ago.  Belichick will definitely see Gronk as a trade asset-only at this point (tried to trade him to DET a couple years back); it's just a matter of how much he can squeeze out of TB in a player and/or a pick.

1 minute ago, bpac55 said:

He's Steve Smith and his attitude would be a nice change compared to Nelson's ho hum mindset the past few years.

If teams see Steve Smith in him, I doubt he gets to 21.

I like Reagor, but you have to admit he's got a little boom or bust to him.  If he's as fast as Ruggs, who can't really run the route tree, he should be ranked ahead of him, or at least he'll go at a comparable time in the 1st.

 

 

Obviously funds were set up to start this board?

How long is this sustainable for?  People going to have to keep dumping money into it? 

Just now, Green Dog said:

If teams see Steve Smith in him, I doubt he gets to 21.

I like Reagor, but you have to admit he's got a little boom or bust to him.  If he's as fast as Ruggs, who can't really run the route tree, he should be ranked ahead of him, or at least he'll go at a comparable time in the 1st.

What I see in Reagor is explosiveness over speed.  He's just a rocked up spring.  Makes catches that guys who have 6" on him can't even make.

The more I've read about Reagor is how much a poor quarterback really effected him this past year.  What you don't like are the reports of his body language and the way he acted around the quarterback on the field. 

4 minutes ago, FTheCowboys said:

Does anyone have Dane Brugler's WR rankings?

Lamb, Jeudy, Ruggs, Jefferson, Aiyuk are the top 5

Just now, Green Dog said:

If teams see Steve Smith in him, I doubt he gets to 21.

I like Reagor, but you have to admit he's got a little boom or bust to him.  If he's as fast as Ruggs, who can't really run the route tree, he should be ranked ahead of him, or at least he'll go at a comparable time in the 1st.

I don't think he's quite as fast as Ruggs.  Reagor looks to be about a 4.33 guy

I do, however, think he's close enough as a player that I'd rather draft him at #21 than move up to #10-12 to draft Ruggs.

2 hours ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Did you take care of that bench warrant?

I didn’t feel it was warranted that i do that.... 

3 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Man.  You're a real treat.  So are you Matt McGinley or MattWill?  

I think it’s a legit question. We can’t expect @VaBeach_Eagle to pay for it by himself. 

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Lamb, Jeudy, Ruggs, Jefferson, Aiyuk are the top 5

I don’t get this love for aiyuk as a first rounder. I like him in the second but I’ve seen him as high as 21. I don’t see him as top 5 receiver in the class. 

5 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Man.  You're a real treat.  So are you Matt McGinley or MattWill?  

Read the bio suckah...

17 minutes ago, Rhinoddd50 said:

That would concern me as well.   

I am wondering if this "WR Draft" ends up being like the "RB Draft" in 2017, the "OL Draft" in 2015, the "QB Draft" in 2012, etc.   The Eagles need to be careful not to try and get too cute with value.   I think it's possible the top 7-8 WR's are gone by #53.

In each of those other drafts, they were strong at positions the Eagles were looking to fill, but in each of those drafts the Eagles waited too long to strike, thinking they had more time to get their guys.    But there was a run on players at those positions between 35 and 95 and picked the board clean (mostly).   

For example we all love Nick Foles, but Andy Reid's primary target was Russell Wilson.   He waited too long and Nick Foles was the compensation prize pick.

https://www.espn.com/blog/philadelphia-eagles/post/_/id/9366/2012-drafts-separated-seahawks-eagles

 

 

 

 

  

I think 2015 is a bad example. A poor draft for most teams.   Every team has missed. I do think Howie misplayed deep drafts but has probably learned.  Miller was a smart pick last year.  No one could have foreseen the level of DT injuries.   Trading down isn’t the same as trading out.  There is enough depth at second tier and third tier WR to make some moves.   That’s why I love the Slay trade.  There isn’t depth at CB.  

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I don’t get this love for aiyuk as a first rounder. I like him in the second but I’ve seen him as high as 21. I don’t see him as top 5 receiver in the class. 

Same. I think many are just projecting what he could be more than what he is.

Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Thanks

 

And I wasn't suggesting that.  It's just the way he said it, it sounded like he was complaining about paying.  

Do I still need to PM you?

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Thanks

 

And I wasn't suggesting that.  It's just the way he said it, it sounded like he was complaining about paying.  

Yeah, the word dump wasn’t ideal...

6 minutes ago, Matt03785 said:

Obviously funds were set up to start this board?

How long is this sustainable for?  People going to have to keep dumping money into it? 

I haven't checked today, but as of last night, the donations were over $3,000. I spent around $1,000 on the initial setup. So that leaves around $2,000. 

I have the hosting account paid for for a full 12 months, the domain is paid for for a full 5 years and the software license renews every 6 months. 

So unless traffic is so heavy that we have to upgrade the hosting package (which is possible, when you think about gameday threads and things like the draft), we should be good for a while. But being forced to upgrade due to traffic, is definitely a possibility/concern. 

5 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Thanks

 

And I wasn't suggesting that.  It's just the way he said it, it sounded like he was complaining about paying.  

I don’t know how many members we are going to have but if we do an annual fee of like 10 dollars we should have more than enough to run assuming like 200-300 members contributing. Heck if we get high enough amount of members we can lower the annual fee

im all for contributing to the cause. I’m waiting til my next paycheck to give to the go fund me. The fact during these times we had over 3000 dollars is amazing. 

Just now, VaBeach_Eagle said:

I haven't checked today, but as of last night, the donations were over $3,000. I spent around $1,000 on the initial setup. So that leaves around $2,000. 

I have the hosting account paid for for a full 12 months, the domain is paid for for a full 5 years and the software license renews every 6 months. 

So unless traffic is so heavy that we have to upgrade the hosting package (which is possible, when you think about gameday threads and things like the draft), we should be good for a while. But being forced to upgrade due to traffic, is definitely a possibility/concern. 

Hats off to you, sir.  I give compliments very rarely, but you've done a superb job with this board.