Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Glad you found and posted this.

This video when i saw it a few weeks ago sold me on reagor.

Oh it wasn't me there either. Will take credit for being sold on Reagor before that; it just cemented my thoughts.

  • Replies 27.2k
  • Views 1.9m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Meet my new Grandson Isaiah Lee greend

  • Green Dog
    Green Dog

    Hmm.  Feels like we've finally cut the cord.  Floating out in the ether. Anger at the faceless dismissal and marginalization of it's own fans by PE.com. But extreme gratitude for guys l

  • Rhinoddd50
    Rhinoddd50

    I mentioned this previously on this board, and in the past years ago on the other board.   I'm not sure Howie has ever come out and said it this plainly, but Howie is telling the truth here.   

Posted Images

Presented without comment.

Just now, devpool said:

Still could prove to be a good pick depending how the rest of their draft goes. But he doesn't make their offense any more dangerous than it was with Cobb 

Could be a great pick. But like you said I don't think he immediately improves the team. For the role they drafted him I think they would be better off with Chaisson or a CB and draft a WR at 51 or some other pick. 

5 minutes ago, RLC said:

Worked out very well.

Eagles using day 3 picks on RBs/OL & day 2 picks on LBs/S/CB = good.

Agreed, but if a strong WR prospect is still there in round 2, I would go for it.

Lamb moves nothing like OBJ.  

38 minutes ago, greend said:

image.png.390acf4864222b346aea6212acd027a7.png

Love your first round pick. 

2 minutes ago, Khani1 said:

With the exception of one game (when Jackson played), Wentz has never had anyone who creates as much separation as Reagor will.  It will be nice for him to have a larger window to throw the ball.  And if he hits him in stride, its over.

This is what I'm most excited for. I watch other games and teams have guys wide open constantly, especially against our defense. How often do we have a guy all by himself? I feel like our receivers always have someone draped over them. Excited to see someone who can give that kind of separation

Just now, devpool said:

This is what I'm most excited for. I watch other games and teams have guys wide open constantly, especially against our defense. How often do we have a guy all by himself? I feel like our receivers always have someone draped over them. Excited to see someone who can give that kind of separation

And in the few games Jackson will play, the defense won't be able to figure out their head from their a**.

I'm posting a lot.  Sorry guys.  I'm just super excited about Reagor.  I think he will be a stronger, more physical, durable version of Jackson.

Love Chris Long

 

14 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Just curious, what is our Eagle experience with TCU players?  I can't recall any offhand.

Big V helped us win SB52.  Matt Pryor is getting better every year, could be 6th OL this year, potential OG starter down the road.

2 minutes ago, Khani1 said:

I'm posting a lot.  Sorry guys.  I'm just super excited about Reagor.  I think he will be a stronger, more physical, durable version of Jackson.

Slightly less explosive, a little slower too, and hopefully less drama. I love the fit here, but don't think he's the same as Desean. Gives some of the similar traits. Pederson has to be pretty ecstatic. 

6 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Lamb moves nothing like OBJ.  

He reminds me of Michael Crabtree.  

2 minutes ago, obedt said:

Slightly less explosive, a little slower too

Yeah I agree with that.  Not many people will ever have Jackson's burst or top speed (Tyreek Hill and maybe a couple others).  That being said, his explosiveness and top speed (which was clocked faster than any play in the NFL last year), will be more than enough to have a great impact.

I hated the talk of a Curtis Samuel trade because I didn't want him to be the only hope as a half measure for spacing on offense.  With Reagor in the fold, if they end up going defense in rounds 2-3, I'd revisit it.

I'd trade a 4th for Samuel.

5 minutes ago, Khani1 said:

I'm posting a lot.  Sorry guys.  I'm just super excited about Reagor.  I think he will be a stronger, more physical, durable version of Jackson.

Another thing people forget about this guy.  As a sophomore he put up 620 lb squat, 380 bench, 380 clean. Speed, strength, explosiveness, jump: absolute freak of an athlete.

1 minute ago, eagle45 said:

I hated the talk of a Curtis Samuel trade because I didn't want him to be the only hope as a half measure for spacing on offense.  With Reagor in the fold, if they end up going defense in rounds 2-3, I'd revisit it.

I'd trade a 4th for Samuel.

Samuel only becomes available if they take Mims in RD2, which is certainly possible.

With Reagor in the fold, there's no longer a need to trade for a veteran WR. We can lineup right now.

1 minute ago, eagle45 said:

I hated the talk of a Curtis Samuel trade because I didn't want him to be the only hope as a half measure for spacing on offense.  With Reagor in the fold, if they end up going defense in rounds 2-3, I'd revisit it.

I'd trade a 4th for Samuel.

Samuel was never going to be the only hope. He was going to be a piece, even for me, and I love Samuel. 

Just now, RLC said:

Samuel only becomes available if they take Mims in RD2, which is certainly possible.

With Reagor in the fold, there's no longer a need to trade for a veteran WR. We can lineup right now.

We might not be desperate anymore, but I’d happily trade for Samuel or flip Rasul for Pettis. 

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

Another thing people forget about this guy.  As a sophomore he put up 620 lb squat, 380 bench, 380 clean. Speed, strength, explosiveness, jump: absolute freak of an athlete.

Yup.  He's a legit 5-11 too.  Why are people complaining he's small?  He's a freaking rock.  No, he isn't 6-3 but who cares.  Maybe they Get Higgins, Mims, Pittman or Claypool to go along with him.  He has got bounce and explosion.  The more I watch actual breakdown of his film the more excite I get about him.  Can't to anything about Lamb anymore.  I've gotta suck it up ugh.  Reagor is going to be a great fit here.

I know people are going to quote Reagor’s 4.47, and I’m just a dude on a message board, but there’s no chance that’s his true speed. He carried too much weight. I promise he’s a 4.40 at worst guy. 

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Samuel was never going to be the only hope. He was going to be a piece, even for me, and I love Samuel. 

We might not be desperate anymore, but I’d happily trade for Samuel or flip Rasul for Pettis. 

Oh I'd cross the border right now to drive Rasul in a Douglas for Samuel trade.

This may never even apply to us, but for the OSU fans, I'd be curious to hear a comparison between Samuel and Paris Campbell.

Just now, bpac55 said:

Yup.  He's a legit 5-11 too.  Why are people complaining he's small?  He's a freaking rock.  No, he isn't 6-3 but who cares.  Maybe they Get Higgins, Mims, Pittman or Claypool to go along with him.  He has got bounce and explosion.  The more I watch actual breakdown of his film the more excite I get about him.  Can't to anything about Lamb anymore.  I've gotta suck it up ugh.  Reagor is going to be a great fit here.

Tommy was the first guy I read said that the top 3 were in general better prospects for a reason, but that he wouldn't want to move up. Didn't see drastic differences between them and the next few. And there's history suggesting trading up for WR in general doesn't equate to great success.

1 minute ago, RLC said:

Oh I'd cross the border right now to drive Rasul in a Douglas for Samuel trade.

I can’t imagine the Panthers would do it, but SF doesn’t pick for awhile. They might take a flyer on Sul. 

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

I know people are going to quote Reagor’s 4.47, and I’m just a dude on a message board, but there’s no chance that’s his true speed. He carried too much weight. I promise he’s a 4.40 at worst guy. 

 

Out of likes

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.