2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Man that second Mosher clip is nice but painful. Over 10 yards of separation with a clean pocket should be an easy TD. I know not every throw is going to be perfect but I can't even track how many easy TD's he could have had to pad his stats.

Also, that was against AJ Green, a day 3 corner. That was the first game I sat and watched of Reagor’s live where I was aware of him. I was smitten. 

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

In fairness it’s not like the Eagles haven’t tried to give him wide receivers. They signed Jeffrey. They traded for DeSean. They traded for Golden Tate. They drafted JJaw. They drafted hollins and Gibson. They traded for Torrey Smith. The fact is they’ve tried but The results are not what we’ve expected outside of the 2017 season. I can’t fault the Eagles for trying but I can’t fault them for their evaluation in drafts and relying on guys that are typically reliable to stay healthy

Trading for Desean last season and only drafting JJaw was ultimately a mistake in hindsight.  Of course, it's not like there were a lot of FA WR's last offseason.  I mean they could have signed Perriman or John Brown but it's not like they had a better track record than Desean.  

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

Once a cheater, always a cheater.

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

In fairness it’s not like the Eagles haven’t tried to give him wide receivers. They signed Jeffrey. They traded for DeSean. They traded for Golden Tate. They drafted JJaw. They drafted hollins and Gibson. They traded for Torrey Smith. The fact is they’ve tried but The results are not what we’ve expected outside of the 2017 season. I can’t fault the Eagles for trying but I can’t fault them for their evaluation in drafts and relying on guys that are typically reliable to stay healthy

I assume you meant "can" for the second can't there. If so, I'd agree with you. To me it comes down to results. You either get it done or you don't. Everybody tries. You get paid to produce in sports. On and off the field.

 

3 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

So if they get Reagor and Mims/Higgins/People-Jones/Hamler/Van Jefferson that is worse than Cee Dee Lamb and no pick until 126 in the draft? 

I can only speak for myself, if Lamb is as good as I think he will be, then yes, to me it isn't even close. I view Lamb as a DeAndre Hopkins kind of player with more explosive playmaking ability.

I asked the other day what kind of WRs we think best fits Wentz. Something to keep in mind the rest of the draft. I still want another vertical WR, preferably one who can line up outside. 

Lime I said earlier, with our two TEs and how much we rotate guys into the slot, I don’t think we need a true slot. 

1 minute ago, purplefiggy said:

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

3.5 to 4.0. 

1 minute ago, purplefiggy said:

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

7.634

9 minutes ago, Double said:

 

welp this is exactly what Howie wanted when drafting a WR. someone who can grow with Wentz so this is good to hear from Jalen. just sucks they cant get no work in together & start forming that relationship on the field.

2 minutes ago, purplefiggy said:

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

Pi

2 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Trading for Desean last season and only drafting JJaw was ultimately a mistake in hindsight.  Of course, it's not like there were a lot of FA WR's last offseason.  I mean they could have signed Perriman or John Brown but it's not like they had a better track record than Desean.  

I mean I was all for Robby Anderson But they didn’t wanna pay them after they’re already paying Alshon and DeSean. Now they could’ve went and got John Brown last year that was another guy I thought would be a good fit and I didn’t think he was going to get overpaid. However desean was still a better player at that time then brown and brown hadn’t been exactly the epitome of health either

2 minutes ago, Desertbirds said:

Once a cheater, always a cheater.

The greatest cheater of all time.

He's the G-COAT.

 

2 minutes ago, FTheCowboys said:

I assume you meant "can" for the second can't there. If so, I'd agree with you. To me it comes down to results. You either get it done or you don't. Everybody tries. You get paid to produce in sports. On and off the field.

 

I can only speak for myself, if Lamb is as good as I think he will be, then yes, to me it isn't even close. I view Lamb as a DeAndre Hopkins kind of player with more explosive playmaking ability.

Yeah meant to say can in the second one. 

Carson Wentz has a top 3 TE and a top 5 TE Duo, a top 5 OL, a future star RB, an offensive coach as an HC and just spent a 1st rounder on a super fast WR. They benched his backup QB who was the Super Bowl MVP in favour of him off a torn ACL/LCL.

The idea that this franchise hasn't done right by Wentz is absurd.

3 minutes ago, purplefiggy said:

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

 

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

3.5 to 4.0. 

 

Same range here.  Maybe slightly lower.  It doesn't look very promising.

3 minutes ago, purplefiggy said:

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

im about a 4 would be a 5 if we had a real offseason. 

2 minutes ago, BirdGang45 said:

welp this is exactly what Howie wanted when drafting a WR. someone who can grow with Wentz so this is good to hear from Jalen. just sucks they cant get no work in together & start forming that relationship on the field.

Why can't he?  Brady and Gronk are together.  Brady and some random dude that lives in the house Brady thought was his OC's are hanging out together.   I don't see the problem.

Just now, purplefiggy said:

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

A solid 5  - if productive is 40 catches and 450 yards. If it's 60 catches and about 700 yards, about a 2.  

15 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

So Jackson and Tyreek just have this natural gliding speed.  Reagor is right up there with their speed but his speed is powerful.  I don't know if that makes sense.

I never said Reagor isn’t up there with their speed. I’ve actually said he’s not like 10 times 

1 minute ago, John_C said:

 

 

Same range here.  Maybe slightly lower.  It doesn't look very promising.

I guess I'm just an eternal optimist who roots for the underdog, but I'd say I'm at a 6-7.  I hear all the concerns and saw what everyone else saw (or didn't see) last season, but like most of these guys, I think the difference between success and failure is mostly between the ears. 

I'm willing to give it at least one more solid season before writing his book, as long as he seems willing to learn and works hard.

15 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

One looks effortless, the other doesn’t? I think that makes sense. 

LOL kind of but that makes it sound negative and I trying to make it a good thing because I think it is.

Just now, bpac55 said:

LOL kind of but that makes it sound negative and I trying to make it a good thing because I think it is.

I don’t think it’s a negative. Speed is speed either way. 

5 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

I never said Reagor isn’t up there with their speed. I’ve actually said he’s not like 10 times 

I am copying and pasting your reply to me from less than 2 hours ago....

 

I just don’t think he looks all that fast/elusive on tape. Ruggs, Hamler, Bowden, and quez Watkins look faster on tape. 

11 minutes ago, purplefiggy said:

scale of 1-10 

10= still fully believe JJAW will become a productive WR for this team

1= completely given up on JJAW 

where do you net out?  

It'd be a bit higher if he had this full off season.  Probably 4-5 range for me.

17 hours ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Does he get #18?

 

17 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

The correct choice. 

Agreed

6 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Welp.  My official prediction yesterday was Reagor but with a trade down.

Pretend we picked at 28 last night and you will feel better.