3 minutes ago, Green Dog said:

I wanted to react but I'M OUT OF LIKES. 

Anything we can do about removing that feature?

They should make likes be microtransactional after your first 100, each like costs .01 and goes to board maintenance. Laugh likes are .05.

In Charlie Casserly's latest mock he has us trading with CLE at 10 and taking CeeDee.

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

They should make likes be microtransactional after your first 100, each like costs .01 and goes to board maintenance. Laugh likes are .05.

For the record I had no intention of reacting to (or laughing at) this.

6 minutes ago, Green Dog said:

I wanted to react but I'M OUT OF LIKES. 

Anything we can do about removing that feature?

I think it's set for 100 in a 24 hour period, @Moderator12 can address that. But assuming you did a like (or other reaction) 24 hours ago, in theory, you could have 'reactions' available to you right now... or at any given moment, depending on when it was that you gave reactions 24 hours or less, ago.

2 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

 

What does Kempski figure on doing at LT?

23 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Elway is dangerously close to being AFC Gettleman, based on setup 

I think Elway gets fired if he screws up this draft and offseason. He was a great QB but he's sucked at GM

16 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Old EMB from a minute or so ago:

 

New EMB from the same time as above:

 

Probably higher too because it's not accounting for anonymous sign ins. Great work!

38 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

 

Have a feeling Jimmy must have been told something to be that adamant about it. 

17 minutes ago, Gator 12 said:

While true, you can have both. You could draft Reagor lets say and still get Goodwin on the cheap. Doesn't put it all on Reagor in this scenario to produce.

Reagor, Hamler, Goodwin. Bunch of 4.2 guys. Cant cover it. 

4 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

 

In service to his narrative regarding Dillard, Kempski has lost objectivity.  

4 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

What does Kempski figure on doing at LT?

I’m guessing using what would be our first, 2 seconds, 2 3rds on one (assuming he’s only dealing him for a 2nd and 3rd). This isn’t a light OT class. It’s actually pretty good and deep into the 3-4th round. If we got Ezra Cleveland or peart in round 2 or 3 I’d be happy. I think both have a bunch of upside. Cleveland imo with stoutland could be a really good LT. 
Probably re-sign peters as well  

i wouldn’t deal dillard. But this class isn’t a weak tackle class 

2 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

What does Kempski figure on doing at LT?

Resigning Peters!  😬

1 minute ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

I think it's set for 100 in a 24 hour period, @Moderator12 can address that. But assuming you did a like (or other reaction) 24 hours ago, in theory, you could have 'reactions' available to you right now... or at any given moment, depending on when it was that you gave reactions 24 hours or less, ago.

Do you have any kinds of settings you can change for the Like system?  Or is it just an on/off feature that comes with the software?

4 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

I think it's set for 100 in a 24 hour period, @Moderator12 can address that. But assuming you did a like (or other reaction) 24 hours ago, in theory, you could have 'reactions' available to you right now... or at any given moment, depending on when it was that you gave reactions 24 hours or less, ago.

  

7 hours ago, Moderator12 said:

Likes are on a rolling 24 hour clock and you can use 100 in that time frame.  

 

For example, at 8:00 am you use 25 and then between noon and 3 pm you use your other 75.  You wont be able to make any more likes until 8:00 am the next day.  And when 8:00 hits, you will only have 25 to give since the other 75 are counted toward the noon-3pm period the previous day.

 

Now, if you don't believe you used 100 likes in 24 hours, please let me know.  There may be something else effecting it.

Just now, Moderator12 said:

  

 

why the limit though?

1 minute ago, 4thandLong said:

Resigning Peters!  😬

And likely taking a LT prospect with one of the 5 selections In the top 103 they would have if they got 2nd and 3rd from the jets. 

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

why the limit though?

Same limit as the old site.

2 minutes ago, Desertbirds said:

In service to his narrative regarding Dillard, Kempski has lost objectivity.  

Or just hasn't seen the context yet from Metah's twitter feed.

Just now, Moderator12 said:

Same limit as the old site.

I know. And people complained about it there too. I remember at one point it was even less and mods increased it for us, but sometimes people still wanted more. Why do we have to have a limit?

Hamler has some wheels but , he also had a drop rate of 17.6

And contested catch rate of 36.4

And he is tiny.

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

why the limit though?

Why? Cause F*** you. That's why.

I can say that. i have moderator points around these parts.

Just now, Original Sin said:

Hamler has some wheels but , he also had a drop rate of 17.6

And contested catch rate of 36.4

And he is tiny.

Being tiny, hes not gonna be a contested catch guy. With his speed and quickness, he doesnt need to have that skill anyway. Just so he can track a deep ball. 

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

And likely taking a LT prospect with one of the 5 selections In the top 103 they would have if they got 2nd and 3rd from the jets. 

Makes no sense...  we don't have a need at LT in this draft.

But all of a sudden a Jets beat guy uses him to boost their GM's cred, and it's an episode of Three's Company?

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

Being tiny, hes not gonna be a contested catch guy. With his speed and quickness, he doesnt need to have that skill anyway. Just so he can track a deep ball. 

He can definitely track a deep ball. 

What about his drops? 

3 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I know. And people complained about it there too. I remember at one point it was even less and mods increased it for us, but sometimes people still wanted more. Why do we have to have a limit?

Probably because you could potentially have someone like your posts and you like theirs to boost your likes to an insane number lol

2 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

What about his drops? 

If he drops 1 a game, but makes an impact all game with his speed, it doesnt seem like a big deal to me.