Seems everybody else answer here has been it’s on the D. I don’t see how everything is on Hurts against the top D. It’s on our D against a QB that is out of his league. Should be a dominating performance by Gannon’s boys. This is the game for him to prove his quality.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Should be really a great game,evenly matched. Both QB's playing well. I think this one is on the defense and if the QB's can figure out how to get around them(both teams). I actually would like to see Hurts take off in this one (usually I don't). For both teams all the tools need to be used. I see both TE's having good days,they are both bears to cover

Agree our defense at home vs a rookie...compared to the 49ers having to deal with MVP and that extra element of mobility.   You would think we should be able to keep the score lower.   49ers have a tougher task on the road vs the MVP QB

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Seems everybody else answer here has been it’s on the D. I don’t see how everything is on Hurts against the top D. It’s on our D against a QB that is out of his league. Should be a dominating performance by Gannon’s boys. This is the game for him to prove his quality.

If the score is in the 30s... then I would say the D failed... but if we lose like a Dallas score ... I would say the QB didn't live up to MVP level. 

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah,I haven't felt good for 18 years,but it doesn't really matter,gotta get it done. 

Take out that trash like the MV Trash taker outter you are

I agree... Hurts and Gannon.    If you are a coaching candidate time to step up.   If you believe you are MVP over the AFC QBs....then time to step up. 

I agree...time for both to do it.  They both have all the tools to succeed.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Take out that trash like the MV Trash taker outter you are

Classy

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Agree our defense at home vs a rookie...compared to the 49ers having to deal with MVP and that extra element of mobility.   You would think we should be able to keep the score lower.   49ers have a tougher task on the road vs the MVP QB

I would like Hurts to take a deep shot as early as possible and keep taking them. Not risky passes,overthrow if you have to,but keep them thinking about it. That should free things up for Goedert. I'm sure they are thinking the same thing

18 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Gotta give Howie credit for getting the guys who have been playing that coverage.  Really see how much better our secondary is compared to the rest of the league.

Having quality DBs matters…hoping he retains that lesson learned

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Take out that trash like the MV Trash taker outter you are

OK, hop in the bag and I will take you to the curb. And where did this uneeded attack come from??? You really need professional help

18 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

But dude... you are not Jalen Hurts.   It needs to be mentioned if it's Hurts.

Excited to see the kid get his moment.  No way he could lose to Brock Purdy...in Philly? 

 

And I would say... Ryans should be getting the head coaching hype as well.  Gannon vs Ryan... MVP vs Mr Irrelevant.   Good stuff.

19 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Personally,I think this game will be tougher than either of the AFC teams

I hope he doesn't cut himself shaving or all hell will break loose

 

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I would like Hurts to take a deep shot as early as possible and keep taking them. Not risky passes,overthrow if you have to,but keep them thinking about it. That should free things up for Goedert. I'm sure they are thinking the same thing

Idk. . Could be game where they want to rely on Sanders.   Keeping this DL away from rushing the passer...you could say Sanders time to step up. He wants the $$$.

Just been quoting with no response for your benefit Cook.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

 

And??? WTF does this have to do with you??? I guess "sharing opinions" is only for the trash. Your actions and moronic comments are trash and it shows how low class you are,but don't stop now,you're on a roll!!!

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

And I would say... Ryans should be getting the head coaching hype as well.  Gannon vs Ryan... MVP vs Mr Irrelevant.   Good stuff.

I hope with home field we can disrupt his timing and signal calling. Going to be high decibel

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

 

I'm pleased you can use the quote button,really impressing me now 🤣

10 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

If the score is in the 30s... then I would say the D failed... but if we lose like a Dallas score ... I would say the QB didn't live up to MVP level. 

So weird to me how you already have the blame laid out without the game having even taken place. A completely different approach from how I judge things.

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I would like Hurts to take a deep shot as early as possible and keep taking them. Not risky passes,overthrow if you have to,but keep them thinking about it. That should free things up for Goedert. I'm sure they are thinking the same thing

I'm curious to see Ryans strategy. I know they have a strong front 4.  But that doesn't work vs the QB who looks to run.   You need the extra bodies to contain.  You would figure they run blitz a bit, test Sanders blocking and look to force Hurts left.

But who knows.  I expect Siri to counter with some quick passes. I would like to see some motion and some Play action or even hand off to a WR.  

 

6 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

And I would say... Ryans should be getting the head coaching hype as well.  Gannon vs Ryan... MVP vs Mr Irrelevant.   Good stuff.

We haven't faced a team this talented all year. I'm curious to see the initial game plan and then the ensuing chess match

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just been quoting with no response for your benefit Cook.

To see personal attacks?   Didn't see any personal attacks.  Comments on players... not sure why you take that personally?   Compared to the posts you made directly to me and GB?

You really don’t see difference?  

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm curious to see Ryans strategy. I know they have a strong front 4.  But that doesn't work vs the QB who looks to run.   You need the extra bodies to contain.  You would figure they run blitz a bit, test Sanders blocking and look to force Hurts left.

But who knows.  I expect Siri to counter with some quick passes. I would like to see some motion and some Play action or even hand off to a WR.  

 

All true,that's kind of why I want to see a deep shot as early as possible,it may open those short gains up,when they move up to counter,take another deep shot

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OK, hop in the bag and I will take you to the curb. And where did this uneeded attack come from??? You really need professional help

That’s what you said earlier you have to do while being less than 100 percent

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

All true,that's kind of why I want to see a deep shot as early as possible,it may open those short gains up,when they move up to counter,take another deep shot

My counter to a deep shot is the blitz...  best way to stop a play that takes longer to develop is to squash it ASAP. 

The good thing for us...Hurts usually gets rid of the deep pass fairly quickly.  I like our guys on the jump balls too.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s what you said earlier you have to do while being less than 100 percent

 I know what I said why do you feel that was an attack on you? Because I talked about Hurts? Are you co-joined? Really sad displays of immaturity

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

My counter to a deep shot is the blitz...  best way to stop a play that takes longer to develop is to squash it ASAP. 

The good thing for us...Hurts usually gets rid of the deep pass fairly quickly.  I like our guys on the jump balls too.

All good points, Hurts really made major strides with short pass accuracy. Both QB's will have smaller windows to throw into and I suspect we can pick off a few of those. Purdy is not as accurate and he's used to having plenty of time and I want us to change that