2 minutes ago, Ace Nova said:

Dillard starts for at least half the teams in the NFL and would (without question) be starting here if he wasn't blocked by a top 3 NFL tackle.  You're 100% wrong there.

Williams has started and is the DL rotation with 2 of the top DT's in the NFL.  Absolutely qualifies.

McPherson, Wallace and Taylor are still very young/developmental players but with high-ceilings.  And they have either started or received significant playing time.  All 3 qualify.  

Gainwell has been part of the RB rotation AND receiving rotation almost all year.  He's been lost in the mix recently but with Sanders out now, he'll start or be in the rotation.  100% qualifies.

Bradly is another "developmental guy with high ceiling" who has been great on special teams , has played on the field and is just waiting his turn to start.   But if you want to take him out, go ahead. 

That's still at least 17-18 players.   

 

We're done here.  We can't discuss things if your facts aren't facts.   Sorry.

The stars lead me to think it might be something like Generals.

4 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

1) the Pac 12 is the worst of the big groups and it's not even close

2) Them losing by 3, or winning by 30 has nothing to do with how bad he looked on most plays. 

3) I understand why you took this as a personal shot but it wasnt. I just prefer the other 2 over him. 

4) I'd take a good prospect from an eastern conference over a great prospect from the Pac 12. 

I don't care what conference a player comes from, if he can play he can play.

Plenty of dudes from big conferences that never did Jack and plenty of small conference guys that work out.

I didn't take it as a personal shot, i don't watch college football much anymore and I've always been more of a BYU fan even though I grew up about 10 minutes from U of U.

I just think this narrative that guys aren't as good as other prospects because of the conference they played in is an outdated take.

You mentioned nakobe Dean who weighs like 210 pounds but you'd take him over Lloyd who has NFL size just because he played at Georgia instead of Utah???

I don't know if Lloyd will be good in the NFL, who knows but I can confidently say if he does or doesn't it won't be because he did or didn't play in a top conference.

 

 

I *think* Dilllard is good based on his rookie year and limited play this year. He's definitely a top 32 LT...but there aren't 25 good LTs in the NFL. How much is that worth in a trade? I'm not sure. I wouldn't trade him for a 5, but round 3 or better giddy up. RD4 is where it gets to be a tough call.

6 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

Never read a more wrong statement in my life. A ton of people locally and nationally still care(good or bad) about Wentz)

The dude didnt suck, he was surronded by dog poop. 

He didnt whine his way off the team.  He was in the middle  of a dumpster fire with a terrible GM who would rather reach for a back up QB then give him a supporting cast

Didn't need the long post, you could have just marked C and or D on the poll.

 

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Has there been one confirmed report that Wentz whined at all?  Dude was mum the whole time.  Never cried on social media like Reagor and other divas have.  Sure, he sucked last year.  Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.  But the whole "whining" thing is just made up BS by morons with an Axe to grind.  

My issue was with his "cult", never with Wentz.    I'm happy he's doing well in Indy and I still think he has the potential to be a top NFL QB.   His cult, on the other hand...well, they got a realty check when they realized Wentz had zero loyalty towards them.  

Never mind on the Generals thing.  Also hate that they are adding black.  Why does every team feel the need to have black as an accent now.  I hope that the Eagles, if they ever do a uniform overhaul, eliminate black from their color scheme but that's never going to happen the way that this team has taken to the black pants.  

 

 

16 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I was hoping for the Dawkins flying pic.

4 minutes ago, RLC said:

I *think* Dilllard is good based on his rookie year and limited play this year. He's definitely a top 32 LT...but there aren't 25 good LTs in the NFL. How much is that worth in a trade? I'm not sure. I wouldn't trade him for a 5, but round 3 or better giddy up. RD4 is where it gets to be a tough call.

I agree with this.  But, that doesn't make him a starter for this team.  He's a depth piece for this team.  Hopefully they can get something back for him.  I don't see him sticking around as a backup LTO. 

3 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

That is an extremely lame option of that's the case.  

I am thinking Admirals, because Washington Generals has been done.

4 minutes ago, RLC said:

I *think* Dilllard is good based on his rookie year and limited play this year. He's definitely a top 32 LT...but there aren't 25 good LTs in the NFL. How much is that worth in a trade? I'm not sure. I wouldn't trade him for a 5, but round 3 or better giddy up. RD4 is where it gets to be a tough call.

I really like incentive based trades for these kind of players. Trade him for a 2023 4th, that could improve to a 3rd based on playing time, or a 2nd based on performance (Pro Bowl for example). I think it makes it "fair" for both teams. The team getting him at worst is out a 4th round pick, but if he plays at a Pro Bowl level, I think most teams would happily give up a 2nd rounder for that kind of LT performance. If he merely gives you 16/17 games of average play, again, I think most would give up a 3rd for that at LT. 

36 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Wagner played at power house Utah St...🤔

Exactly!  Inferior talent lol

1 hour ago, Bacarty2 said:

Why, it would help with the trade bait. Getting a first for him would be amazing and this is a 10 win team next year with 4 first rounders and Misnhew. 

 

Because he won't be traded.  It will just further secure his return next season as the starter. 

would be funny if Washington's new team name would be :

 

"America's Football Team"

 

Just to piss off the Cowboys. 

15 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Has there been one confirmed report that Wentz whined at all?  Dude was mum the whole time.  Never cried on social media like Reagor and other divas have.  Sure, he sucked last year.  Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.  But the whole "whining" thing is just made up BS by morons with an Axe to grind.  

No there hasn't but at this point I get tired of correcting fools and I just don't care anymore. 

39 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Wagner played at power house Utah St...🤔

I think that was his point.

7 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

We're done here.  We can't discuss things if your facts aren't facts.   Sorry.

No need to apologize.  I wasn't planning on going back and forth with you on this either.   

1 hour ago, downundermike said:

Why ??  We are Eagles fans, winning in the playoffs would be great.  Just because you were stressed out watching Nick Foles win the Super Bowl, does not mean that logic applies to others with Hurts.  Just because we can be honest, does not mean we hate the team.

 

I'm sure you'll be complaining after each hypothetical win how this is all just worsening the Eagles draft position and they will definitely lose in the next round.  All the while spending 5 pages dissecting an incompletion from the previous game as well as a play where he completed a pass but had someone else open who you say he should have passed to. 

1 minute ago, greend said:

No there hasn't but at this point I get tired of correcting fools and I just don't care anymore. 

Greeny, now that we're at the end of the season...any change in your thoughts on Howie (basing this on your avatar pic)?

13 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

 

I'm not even bothering with you today.  If you want to take 3-4 players out, go ahead.  My point still stands.  

Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

What a perfect summation of his posts. Unreal. 

10 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I agree with this.  But, that doesn't make him a starter for this team.  He's a depth piece for this team.  Hopefully they can get something back for him.  I don't see him sticking around as a backup LTO. 

I'd like to trade him too, but a good backup LT is more valuable than a 5th. That's the tricky part.

8 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

I really like incentive based trades for these kind of players. Trade him for a 2023 4th, that could improve to a 3rd based on playing time, or a 2nd based on performance (Pro Bowl for example). I think it makes it "fair" for both teams. The team getting him at worst is out a 4th round pick, but if he plays at a Pro Bowl level, I think most teams would happily give up a 2nd rounder for that kind of LT performance. If he merely gives you 16/17 games of average play, again, I think most would give up a 3rd for that at LT. 

I'm very comfortable doing it this way too. For the life of me, I don't understand why Carolina didn't do this mid-season. It KOed their season.

2 minutes ago, justrelax said:

I think that was his point.

I thought he was making the opposite point that bacarty was making that only guys from power conferences are worth drafting.

1 minute ago, Ace Nova said:

I'm not even bothering with you today.  If you want to take 3-4 players out, go ahead.  My point still stands.  

12 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I agree with this.  But, that doesn't make him a starter for this team.  He's a depth piece for this team.  Hopefully they can get something back for him.  I don't see him sticking around as a backup LTO. 

I am thinking Admirals, because Washington Generals has been done.

I’ve seen some people suggest Commanders will be the name. 

1 minute ago, RLC said:

I'd like to trade him too, but a good backup LT is more valuable than a 5th. That's the tricky part.

I agree.  But we also need a backup RT.  I'd rather find a swing guy than keep flipping Mailata when Johnson goes down (and he will again next year).