June 25, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Wouldn't a federal law protecting abortion simply be deemed unconstitutional by this SC? No
June 25, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, Procus said: No Right at least not on the same grounds they struck down Roe/Casey (Substantive Due Process).
June 25, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, ToastJenkins said: Outliers. Not the basis of a sound position. this will have to be a big compromise to get a federal law. So unlikely to happen. Instead we will get a patchwork mess on a state by state basis Outliers that are ignored by trigger laws in multiple states, because they have your same illogical thought process. Regardless of how often it happens, forcing a victim of rape to carry to term is horrible when it can be easily avoided by being included as an applicable exception.
June 25, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, 20dawk4life said: Yea. How dare they have an opinion if they can’t get pregnant. What a bunch of aholes. "You have to be a woman to have a valid opinion on abortion" might just be the dumbest thing I've heard in this entire thread.
June 25, 20224 yr 5 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: "You have to be a woman to have a valid opinion on abortion" might just be the dumbest thing I've heard in this entire thread. And we have @Ipiggles posting in here
June 25, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said: And we have @Ipiggles posting in here /\/\/\/\ another poster child for the Dunning Kruger effect.
June 25, 20224 yr 10 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: "You have to be a woman to have a valid opinion on abortion" might just be the dumbest thing I've heard in this entire thread. I see pro choice women using that defense all the time.
June 25, 20224 yr 3 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: /\/\/\/\ another poster child for the Dunning Kruger effect.
June 25, 20224 yr Just now, 20dawk4life said: If only I valued your opinion.... hmmm too bad, so sad, I dont. In fact, it's clear I think even less of you, than you do of I.
June 25, 20224 yr 35 minutes ago, MidMoFo said: I'm not a bartender. It's easy to pick out that you are one dumb motherFer.
June 25, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, Ipiggles said: I see pro choice women using that defense all the time. And they're just as stupid.
June 25, 20224 yr 37 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: And they're just as stupid. I do think it’s hard to make the argument that having a baby is a 50-50 decision. Just because… But men should have an opinion about women’s rights.
June 25, 20224 yr 6 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: I do think it’s hard to make the argument that having a baby is a 50-50 decision. Just because… But men should have an opinion about women’s rights. I support their right to free speech, property rights, etc. stuff actually enumerated as rights.
June 25, 20224 yr 17 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: I support their right to free speech, property rights, etc. stuff actually enumerated as rights. How about start a business? Or get a mortgage?
June 25, 20224 yr 20 hours ago, Gannan said: You've excused trying to manufacture 11,000 fake votes in Georgia, the violent insurrection at our capital, and the attempted murder of our former vice president, but yeah sure leaking is where you're going to draw the line 20 hours ago, Ipiggles said: I'll wait while you prove that I have done all you stated here. First I am not even sure what 11,000 Fake votes you are talking about? Refresh my memory on that one. As far as Jan 6th, how many times do I have to state the same things to be clear- Anyone who was voilent on Jan 6th and anyone who entered the Capital illegally, should be punsihed to the fullest extent. Yeah sure sounds like I am excusing that one And the what the what with an attempted Murder of the VP? what in the serious dafuq are you talking about? When did someone try to kill a VP recently? And just how did I excuse that? God you people either get me confused with someone else, or just have really bad reading comprehension. I will be waiting a LONG LONG LONG (long after I am dead and gone) before you find anything remotely close to everything you claimed here. Perfect example of a gutless keyboard warrior punk, Makes false claims and cant back them up. It's why you have been on ignore for a while, with the OTHER CVON cultists who act like you do, where you dont let the facts get in the way of your feelings.
June 25, 20224 yr Being secure in their persons certainly suggests the government has no right to compel an individual to reveal a health related matter to government without a warrant.
June 25, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Being secure in their persons certainly suggests the government has no right to compel an individual to reveal a health related matter to government without a warrant. A little late to that game. 😒
June 25, 20224 yr https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/the-forgotten-history-of-justice-ginsburgs-criticism-of-roe-v-wade/2016/03/01/9ba0ea2e-dfe8-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html The forgotten history of Justice Ginsburg’s criticism of Roe v. Wade
June 25, 20224 yr There's a very simple solution, for those that are on the side of unfettered abortion. Propose a Constitutional Amendment that protects it as a basic right. If there is a large enough majority of support, it becomes cemented in the fabric of the Constitution.
June 25, 20224 yr 7 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Wouldn't a federal law protecting abortion simply be deemed unconstitutional by this SC? Though I'd be curious to see this court make a ruling if Roe was argued for under some of the sounder arguments that have been floated as opposed to the flawed original ruling. I think you could splinter some off at least some of the Republican justices if you had actual legislation. Frankly, I think the Democrats would actually win in the court that federal legislation is legal. The ruling here is that there is no constitutional right to an abortion, which is just a fact. But that doesn’t mean they would rule against a law passed by Congress at the federal level. Democrats are using projection here when they see this as a blind partisan ruling. That’s their game. RvW was a ruling of convenience, not a sound legal ruling. The Republican justices simply made the judgement on if there is a constitutional right to abortion, which of course there isn’t. A federal law passed by Congress is a different matter entirely than SCOTUS inventing constitutional rights from nothing.
Create an account or sign in to comment