4 hours ago, bobeph said:

 RIOT KITCHEN!!!!   Help!  I AM BEING KIDNAPPED!!

A bunch a bish’s all of them once they aren’t in a group.   Once alone they go into the fetal position. 

11 minutes ago, NCTANK said:

now there’s a punchable face

Nah. Would almost be like punching a girl

1 hour ago, TEW said:

They wuz inventorz AND kangz!

Ukin old as dirt good for nothing (but pandering of course) moron.

god help us all

4 hours ago, mr_hunt said:

afraid the dems are gonna make you buttfarg teenagers? 

 

 

    

C’mon, Boris.  Give me a ukn’ break.  

4 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

yeah I'm not really weighing in here on whether or not the law is good or bad. it's more about whether it's being equally applied.

you claimed homosexuals were getting some additional latitude legally; that's just false. this bill is to give judges the ability to make the same considerations for "gay" sex as for straight. @bobeph is probably on board.

in terms of the law, I don't actually think it's even that bad. you're letting a judge decide. if some 19 year old dude bangs his 17 year old girlfriend (or boyfriend), it's technically illegal but should the guy really have to register as a sex offender? I don't think so. 

if a judge looks at a 15-year-old girl who was banged anally by a 25-year-old man, the judge still has the latitude to classify the guy as a sex offender.

I think giving judges the ability to decide on the merits of the individual cases makes some sense here. the 10 year number seems a bit arbitrary and maybe higher than I'd want it - I think 5 years would be better - but this isn't exactly as you presented it.

I’m gonna ukn’ kill you.

2 hours ago, SNOORDA said:

A bunch a bish’s all of them once they aren’t in a group.   Once alone they go into the fetal position. 

F’in 💯!  Just like @JohnSnowsHair and his CVON libtard army in here.  @mr_hunt first class private Snowball!

2 hours ago, bobeph said:

I’m gonna ukn’ kill you.

why, you poz? 

Yeah, this will definitely end well...

3 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

why, you poz? 

Because I’m a liberal and that’s what I do when someone hurts my feelings 

4 hours ago, bobeph said:

Because I’m a liberal and that’s what I do when someone hurts my feelings 

I don't care about your politics, are you offering a hot poz load or do I need to wait until you're a few white claws in?

Cops shoot ANTIFA F face overnight.  But it doesn’t matter.  He was white.  May his soul rot in hell. 

1 minute ago, bobeph said:

Cops shoot ANTIFA F face overnight.  But it doesn’t matter.  He was white.  May his soul rot in hell. 

You mean the murderer?

Just now, Paul852 said:

You mean the murderer?

Who cares?  He’s white.  Blake was a rapist but he’s black so we have to focus and lose our collective sheet over that.

Just now, bobeph said:

Who cares?  He’s white.  Blake was a rapist but he’s black so we have to focus and lose our collective sheet over that.

Yeah, you're missing the mark on this one. Regroup and try again.

1 minute ago, Paul852 said:

Yeah, you're missing the mark on this one. Regroup and try again.

Not missing anything.

Liberals say:

BLACK GOOD!

WHITE BAD!

Just now, bobeph said:

Not missing anything.

Liberals say:

BLACK GOOD!

WHITE BAD!

Wait, are you defending the murderer who was Antifa? I'm so confused.

Just now, Paul852 said:

Wait, are you defending the murderer who was Antifa? I'm so confused.

No!  He was white.  Didn’t even need to look at the story.  Face white, man bad.  Put to death!  Black face, man good.  Leave alone.

that’s what we’re supposed to say, right?

6 minutes ago, bobeph said:

No!  He was white.  Didn’t even need to look at the story.  Face white, man bad.  Put to death!  Black face, man good.  Leave alone.

that’s what we’re supposed to say, right?

Sure, Bob. You're totally making an awesome point.

1 minute ago, Paul852 said:

Sure, Bob. You're totally making an awesome point.

Black man good.

White man bad.

easy as 1.  2.  3.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/03/jessica-krug-white-professor-pretended-black

White professor of Black History pretended to be black.

Move over, Rachel Dolezal.

just another fraud

So she identifies as black? What's wrong with that? If she would have identified as a man, or a chipmunk or toaster everyone would think she's brave, but she identifies as black and she's wrong?

1 hour ago, BFit said:

So she identifies as black? What's wrong with that? If she would have identified as a man, or a chipmunk or toaster everyone would think she's brave, but she identifies as black and she's wrong?

Pretending to be black and telling people you grew up places that you didn’t is kind of dishonest I guess...

the fact that she wrote about racial issues as a white person pretending to be black is pretty messed up.  But honestly in 2020 this kind of behavior actually seems normal.   Smh...

2 hours ago, BFit said:

So she identifies as black? What's wrong with that? If she would have identified as a man, or a chipmunk or toaster everyone would think she's brave, but she identifies as black and she's wrong?

I just don’t think America is ready for a black white chick.  Maybe in another 10 years