5 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Dude, we all remember it as Franklin just stated. Saying you wouldn't want Foles to win a Super Bowl elsewhere is meaningless given the context. You weren't asked about him winning it elsewhere, as no one cared about him winning it elsewhere. He was an Eagle at the time. He was the starter due to Wentz's injury at the time. You were asked if you wanted him to win the Super Bowl, and your first word was "No". You didn't respond with a "No, but", you didn't respond with an attempt to answer something completely different. Your reply started with "No." 

I am in the archives looking for it 

Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I thought the SB was even more special because it was Foles.

Just now, RLC said:

Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I thought the SB was even more special because it was Foles.

It could have been Mike Boryla, for all I cared. I just wanted to win one...finally.

My God do these teams suck.

We are categorically the class of the conference.

1 minute ago, D-Shiznit said:

My God do these teams suck.

We are categorically the class of the conference.

Watching Rams-Bucs makes me extremely grateful for what the Eagles are achieving this year.

25 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

They aren't gonna beat the Ravens

The Ravens lost to the Giants they can easily choke away games the Eagles need

How soon the worm doth turn

 

17 minutes ago, metal said:

Huh, the Seahawks waived released SIdney Jones last week. TIL. Guess he's actually not that good after all.

You were correct when you said waived. He also cleared waivers. 

@EagleJoe8 here is the option RTK voted for

 

20 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

How you started the post, made the rest of the post meaningless. You said no. Any mention of Foles being elsewhere had no relevance, as I said. You said it. 

 

It's called context.  It's called fully fleshing out an answer through a paragraph.  You're being intentionally obtuse and there is flat-out no reason for me to continue discussing this with you.  

16 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Dude, we all remember it as Franklin just stated. Saying you wouldn't want Foles to win a Super Bowl elsewhere is meaningless given the context. You weren't asked about him winning it elsewhere, as no one cared about him winning it elsewhere. He was an Eagle at the time. He was the starter due to Wentz's injury at the time. You were asked if you wanted him to win the Super Bowl, and your first word was "No". You didn't respond with a "No, but", you didn't respond with an attempt to answer something completely different. Your reply started with "No." 

 

I said in my full answer of that post that I wanted him and the Eagles to win it.  It's there, you can go read it.  You're being intentionally ignorant right now when you know full well what that entire post says.

3 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

How soon the worm doth turn

 

They have no receivers outside of Lazard. Plus they just had 8 injuries in todays game

1 minute ago, Mike030270 said:

They have no receivers outside of Lazard. Plus they just had 8 injuries in todays game

Some fans want to play Jordan Love for the rest of the seasn so they can see what they have.  They don't need to, he's rubbish.

1 minute ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

It's called context.  It's called fully fleshing out an answer through a paragraph.  You're being intentionally obtuse and there is flat-out no reason for me to continue discussing this with you.  

You're being intentionally dishonest. You don't wish to discuss it as you know you're looking bad. You don't "flesh out an answer" to the question asked by responding with "No." You respond by saying, "I want the Eagles to win the Super Bowl no matter who is under center". There is no reason to respond to Foles being elsewhere.

Here is another gem @EagleJoe8

 

Just now, downundermike said:

Here is another gem @EagleJoe8

 

I definitely remember that one.

Just now, EagleJoe8 said:

You're being intentionally dishonest. You don't wish to discuss it as you know you're looking bad. You don't "flesh out an answer" to the question asked by responding with "No." You respond by saying, "I want the Eagles to win the Super Bowl no matter who is under center". There is no reason to respond to Foles being elsewhere.

 

I pretty much did when you read the entire post and don't selectively edit everything out but a sentence.  It's intentionally dishonest and of extremely bad character.  

4 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Here is another gem @EagleJoe8

 

What a clown. 

15 minutes ago, Fresh_Prince said:

The Ravens lost to the Giants they can easily choke away games the Eagles need

Any team can easily lose any game. I didn't say they couldn't, I said they won't. Big difference.

4 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

Some fans want to play Jordan Love for the rest of the seasn so they can see what they have.  They don't need to, he's rubbish.

I bet if Rodgers went somewhere else with actual playmakers then that team would be going to the playoffs

2 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

I pretty much did when you read the entire post and don't selectively edit everything out but a sentence.  It's intentionally dishonest and of extremely bad character.  

Bad character??? No, this is bad character...

 

Let me see you try and spin your way out of that one!

24 minutes ago, D-Shiznit said:

My God do these teams suck.

We are categorically the class of the conference.

It’s a really down year for the nfl outside of a couple of teams. Vikings are 7-1 and habe Been in dogfights with teams like the saints, cards, lions and bears. Washington is 4-5 and that team is averaging 17.6 ppg. The giants and titans both are 6-2 and when you watch them it’s ugly brand of football.

id be more what is going on with the bills if they didn’t pull the same type of wtf loss where as last year when they lost to the jags in Jacksonville. 

Wow what a play by Collins to pick that and return it to the house 

Here is is @EagleJoe8

 

1 minute ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Bad character??? No, this is bad character...

 

Let me see you try and spin your way out of that one!

 

What?  I wasn't a fan of Nick Foles prior to him winning the Super Bowl.  When did I ever deny that.  Your post has nothing to do with the other post that you are talking about.  What is the purpose of dragging up 5 year old posts that have no relevance whatsoever to right now if for no other reason that you're intentionally trying to stir crap up instead of discussing football?