Just now, NCiggles said:

 

Do you think there should be a debate about racists using the n word? People would be banned here for using it.  Why don't you think Twitter shouldn't ban it? 

I don't there is any debate about child exploitation.  Even those sick enough to engage in it, know they are sick. It doesn't seem like many racists believe there's a problem with dropping an n-bomb. 

Moreover, the real issue is that by unbanning it, Elon hurt the company's revenue.  He fundamentally misjudged the marketplace.  

I found use of the N word silly and a deliberate middle finger to the pearl clutchers.  But I think child exploitation is a far more serious issue on a societal level and on social media platforms that a bunch of idiots using the N word. And if Musk was to be believed, it was largely from a small number of users running bots.

5 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

 

Not to change the subject... but why are the WRs working on this, and not just letting the QB work on throwing a better ball?  I thought it was all Hurts' fault.

Well they know there’ll be more poor throws so they have to practice to be ready, obviously

10 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

 

Not to change the subject... but why are the WRs working on this, and not just letting the QB work on throwing a better ball?  I thought it was all Hurts' fault.

Hurtzzzzzzzz fault 

34 minutes ago, olsilverhair said:

This blog needs an eagle win so bad

You and mattwill Facebook official yet? 

12 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

I think his point was(specifically Libs) is this...

Mass Murders on Twitter, no big deal. Child Porn, no big deal. Real Live Communist leaders, WHo cares. A place to set up Mod riots, group rapes and other "team sports"...Meh.....

BUt the N word, the N word is the issue GTFO. 

 

Who is saying it’s no big deal? You’re just making things up. 

13 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

I think his point was(specifically Libs) is this...

Mass Murders on Twitter, no big deal. Child Porn, no big deal. Real Live Communist leaders, WHo cares. A place to set up Mod riots, group rapes and other "team sports"...Meh.....

BUt the N word, the N word is the issue GTFO. 

 

Did you visit the Steelers page when you were suspended? 

Do we have any all pros this year?

Kelce

Lane

Slay

Anyone else?

1 minute ago, Mike030270 said:

Do we have any all pros this year?

Kelce

Lane

Slay

Anyone else?

I’d say AJ is probably second team. Bradberry and CJ as well 

17 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

You and mattwill Facebook official yet? 

nah, I think he likes dudes

43 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

Quick Reminder of the Saints remaining schedule and the idiots who thought this was a playoff team.

Rams, (w) at San Fran(L) At Tampa(L) Atlanta(who knows) Brown(with Watson) L, Eagles, L, Carolina, W

5 Win team should get us around 5th, depending on some tie breakers

Not exactly hard teams thou are they ? (apart from the eagles and SF)

56 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

I found use of the N word silly and a deliberate middle finger to the pearl clutchers.  But I think child exploitation is a far more serious issue on a societal level and on social media platforms that a bunch of idiots using the N word. And if Musk was to be believed, it was largely from a small number of users running bots.

Has Elon banned the child porn or is that allowed now too? 

43 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Do we have any all pros this year?

Kelce

Lane

Slay

Anyone else?

 

Hurts

Lane

Kelce

CJGJ

AJ

Slay

Bradberry

Goedert (although 4 weeks out Hurts 2nd team) 

Hargrave could also get consideration.  He leads DTs with 7 sacks.

McPherson as ST

14 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Has Elon banned the child porn or is that allowed now too? 

 

Elon said what will be banned is what is actually banned by law.  So yes child porn would be banned by law.  Your Lord Voldemort he who must not be named word the N word would be allowed. 

 

You ban a word/phrase or censor it and you just give more power to it. 

57 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Hurtzzzzzzzz fault 

I'd like to see a clip of the throw and catch from start, if I remember Quez dove for the pass.

Was the diving necessary due to hurts putting the ball too far out in front, did he unnecessarily dive when he could have kept running.???

Did he catch then just lose balance and fall bang bang which made him look like he dove for the the ball???

Either way if he keeps his feet he probably scores, and if he holds onto the ball after the catch not as much talk about this play.

Just now, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Elon said what will be banned is what is actually banned by law.  So yes child porn would be banned by law.  Your Lord Voldemort he who must not be named word the N word would be allowed. 

 

You ban a word and you just give more power to it. 

Or do stupid stuff like this.

👌

2 hours ago, Parrot Head said:

90% of Twitter employees gone, and yet it’s still working great….

Serious question... do you shut your computer down every time you walk away from it because you think it will explode or grow legs and walk out if you leave it unattended?

4 minutes ago, Utebird said:

I'd like to see a clip of the throw and catch from start, if I remember Quez dove for the pass.

Was the diving necessary due to hurts putting the ball too far out in front, did he unnecessarily dive when he could have kept running.???

Did he catch then just lose balance and fall bang bang which made him look like he dove for the the ball???

Either way if he keeps his feet he probably scores, and if he holds onto the ball after the catch not as much talk about this play.

Or do stupid stuff like this.

👌

I don't see a dive or a trip or any reason he fell to the ground other than to secure the ball against his chest

4 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I don't see a dive or a trip or any reason he fell to the ground other than to secure the ball against his chest

Yup

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I don't see a dive or a trip or any reason he fell to the ground other than to secure the ball against his chest

Yeah I watched it about 5 times and it seems the dive was unnecessary, which begs the question did he dive in purpose and why? I mean like I said he keeps his feet he scores, or did he just lose his balance and take a dive??

Quez is probably the only one who knows, either way too bad he couldn't keep his feet and doubly too bad he fumbled upon getting up 

Just a really good play turned really bad☹️

Having said that I really hate the way steichen/sirrianni are utilizing Devonte Smith.

He's and explosive player with good length good speed and is averaging just over 10 yards catch because so many of his targets are 5 yard passes, it's just weird.

Draw up some plays to get him deep take a shot or two a game instead of just throwing him wr screens and 5 yard hitches and ins all game 🤷‍♂️

Maybe Elon can free Mike too

5 hours ago, TorontoEagle said:

@bpac55 do you watch college football?

More than the NFL. Love college football.   Why do you ask?

1 hour ago, Utebird said:

I'd like to see a clip of the throw and catch from start, if I remember Quez dove for the pass.

Was the diving necessary due to hurts putting the ball too far out in front, did he unnecessarily dive when he could have kept running.???

Did he catch then just lose balance and fall bang bang which made him look like he dove for the the ball???

Either way if he keeps his feet he probably scores, and if he holds onto the ball after the catch not as much talk about this play.

Or do stupid stuff like this.

👌

 

16.46 in the video.  It should be timestamped but if not. He just fell unnecessarily. 

 

Am I wrong to be getting annoyed over the massive increase in using stats instead of just using our eyes and looking at the records ?  I agree with the parcells quote and your record being a true reflection of where a team is.

8 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

More than the NFL. Love college football.   Why do you ask?

Do you get bothered by the numbers there? It’s far more prevalent 

11 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Do you get bothered by the numbers there? It’s far more prevalent 

I don't think you want me to get in to my thoughts on numbers.  Maybe it will distract from the twitter talk but I could write a few pages.

I love the oddball numbers in college football. Traditionally, your studs get the single digits.  In the past, if you saw a DE or a LB in a single digit or a LB wearing 44/55...you knew that guy was going to be special.  Your stud WR/S/CB were single digits or in the teens.  I also liked that the NFL had stricter number rules and was different than NCAA.  I always liked seeing guys "graduate" to an NFL number.  Good example would be Jerome Bettis.  #6 was so unique and different for him at ND, but when he got to the NFL, he had to pick a professional number.  

I always liked DE/DT wearing 85 or 88 too.  Again, the more unique a number to the position, the better he typically was, or at least the better you thought he was going to be.  I know, this all sounds silly but again it goes back to my days of collecting football cards, getting every preseason magazine I could get my hands on and studying what players wore be it their number or their gear.  

Then you had your schools with their legacy numbers.  Syracuse with 44 before they retired it.  USC LB getting 55.  Michigan WR getting 1.  Miami S in 26 and so on.

Your freshman who aren't expected to contribute right away are given the most unpopular numbers as the roster is filled out.  

Basically, Suh and Joseph were given freshman numbers.  

I could go on and on.