Just now, Texas Eagle said:

What class? 2009 here

 

'06. You were a year ahead of my brother, and I have a few friends who were class of '09.

45 minutes ago, olsilverhair said:

I could never live in a city, never, ever, ever, dallas sucks

Good cuz you should stay in your trailer park 

3 minutes ago, Texas Eagle said:

 

The whole Niners team needs to go on a darkness retreat with Aaron Rodgers.  The company of Rodgers will be tricky, but anything to stop their incessant moaning

Now their kicker is talking ish lol.  Get these guys some cream for their butt hurt

The 49ers are doing everything they can to get the Eagles fired up for this game.

14 minutes ago, Ipiggles said:

I turned on the NFL Honers, only to hear George Kittle try to sing- (he wasn't even on the right key- much like Hurts with Fly Eagle Fly) 

And I was out.

 

 

Why do they think they have to do that type of crap? Why all the celebrities? Why not just keep it about football? (rhetorical questions- I know they are trying to attract non-football fan viewers - meanwhile turning off the real football fans- Chuck Bednarik is turning over in his grave). 

 

Because they can sell it as a product for TV and think that they will get viewers.  They are squeezing the goose that lays the golden egg harder and harder trying to get more and more from her.  Eventually, it will hit the excessive saturation point.

6 hours ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

Ronde had 15 forced fumbles 12 recovered , 28 sacks and 1250 tackles. He played like 30 more games then Allen but, still those stats for a corner are insane to go along with 47 interceptions.

I think Allen should be in but, Ronde deserves to be there too

Yup, I just didn't like him because well he was a Buc who shut down the vet

Call me a niners fan with sour grapes ...😉

I genuinely hope that the next time we play the 49ers we beat them by five scores.

29 minutes ago, Texas Eagle said:

 

This is a clip of him saying they are going to have to pay, but there is absolutely no context here. Is he really threatening them?

Maybe he is talking about the next time to all go out for dinner.

Maybe he is talking about the next time they play CoD together.

Maybe he is talking about the next round of golf.

Maybe he is talking about limiting their catches the next time they play.

Let's win one before we discuss this.

45 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

You mean Joe Klecko?    I always thought of Dan Klecko as being Joe's son... but we can flip it the other way, if you'd like.   Klecko is deserving.  Also... he's a local guy.  Born in Chester, PA.  Temple University product.  People forget about Klecko, but he led the league in sacks one year with 20.5.  Late in his career he was moved to NT, and the stats just vanished.  Klecko barely missed out on being named Defensive Player of the Year that season with the 20.5 sacks...  He was edged out by Lawrence Taylor.   Taylor had only 9.5 sacks that year.  But the Jets split their vote... Gasteneau finished 3rd, and had 20 sacks.  Imagine having two pass rushers get 20+ sacks in a season.  Unbelievable.

I'd have to check the records to confirm this, but I believe that Joe Klecko was picked one spot ahead of the Eagles in the sixth round of the draft and that the Eagles had actually planned on picking him. That was the story at the time...that the Eagles had wanted him, I mean.

Maybe not all that interesting, but BwF posed the question: Would you rather the Eagles have the ball down 3 with 2 minutes left or playing defense up 3 with 2 minutes left?

1 hour ago, bpac55 said:

At this point, I'm all for it. I know that there are a lot of people who aren't religious and don't believe in God,  and I also know that no religion is perfect.  However, after seeing the pure joy from so many elites after Sam Smith's Grammy performance, I'm happy to see some on the mainstage give thanks to God.  Chris Pratt gets vilified for being an open Christian in Hollywood.  Tim Tebow was hated because of it.  Being anti-Christian is more popular than ever as is the rise in open Satanic ritualstic behavior.  I know it's been going on for ages but it's never been backed like it is now.  Madonna can openly mock Christianity late in to her disgusting 60s and be cheered for it but if you complain about Smith's perforance being too Satanic, then you're laughed and told to calm down.  It's one thing to argue that Satanic worship is a form of religion and shoiuld be treated equally, but it's another to openly promote it while putting down Christianity.

I'm far from a Bible thumper and I know that being Catholic is frowned upon in 2023, however, I'm still proud to be Christian and a follower of Jesus Christ.  We need more people like Chris Pratt and Ben Watson to be celebrated rather than ridiculed.  Teach young people that it's OK to believe in God. 

Flame away, I don't care.

Didn't watch the Grammys but from your descriptions of Sam Smiths "satanic" performance sounds like the illuminati sunk their claws in.

There have been tales over the years of a shadow group in the music industry that promise these " stars" inclusion into their special club and to do so they must go through an initiation. (On stage satanic or sex stuff)

Miley Cyrus grinding with Allen Thicke, Katy Perry with her satanic performance, even Kesha's last music video before she dropped her label and went more independent, where In the lyrics she even mentions getting free of the monsters that control her, that video is all satanic imagery.

Sure people will say it's a crazy conspiracy theory but people say the same about the MK ultra program and the Greenbaum speech.

Either way anytime I see a music artist on  stage do something satanic in nature gives me pause and makes me wonder whose got their claws in them.

As for all the Christian stuff, in your face evangelicals who speak of Jesus worship  and then clutch  their crosses at the site of a homeless person or a person from the LGBTQ are more annoying than showy Hollywood fake satanists .

 

5 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Maybe not all that interesting, but BwF posed the question: Would you rather the Eagles have the ball down 3 with 2 minutes left or playing defense up 3 with 2 minutes left?

That’s a fun scenario. My instinct is up 3 on defense. You have the win in hand, just need to close it out. Down 3, while I believe they could put a drive together to at least tie it, still leaves the game in doubt. I have confidence in our defense to make a play and get the ball back to end it. 
 

3 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Maybe not all that interesting, but BwF posed the question: Would you rather the Eagles have the ball down 3 with 2 minutes left or playing defense up 3 with 2 minutes left?

Up 3 is scarier given Mahomes, but it's the right call from a win probability perspective.

10 minutes ago, RLC said:

Let's win another one before we discuss this.

FYP

5 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Maybe not all that interesting, but BwF posed the question: Would you rather the Eagles have the ball down 3 with 2 minutes left or playing defense up 3 with 2 minutes left?

Down 3 with the ball on offense. That said, again if Hurts plays to his potential I think we win big

2 minutes ago, greend said:

FYP

Yup.

Teams going to look a lot different this time next year.

Tough to maintain a dynastic team these days 

Back in Dallas hey days the big 3 Aikman Irvin and Emmitt were all able to be re-signed as the Cap wasn't as restrictive.

Now a days the capmakes it more difficult to have a dynasty.

 

11 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Didn't watch the Grammys but from your descriptions of Sam Smiths "satanic" performance sounds like the illuminati sunk their claws in.

There have been tales over the years of a shadow group in the music industry that promise these " stars" inclusion into their special club and to do so they must go through an initiation. (On stage satanic or sex stuff)

Miley Cyrus grinding with Allen Thicke, Katy Perry with her satanic performance, even Kesha's last music video before she dropped her label and went more independent, where In the lyrics she even mentions getting free of the monsters that control her, that video is all satanic imagery.

Sure people will say it's a crazy conspiracy theory but people say the same about the MK ultra program and the Greenbaum speech.

Either way anytime I see a music artist on  stage do something satanic in nature gives me pause and makes me wonder whose got their claws in them.

As for all the Christian stuff, in your face evangelicals who speak of Jesus worship  and then clutch  their crosses at the site of a homeless person or a person from the LGBTQ are more annoying than showy Hollywood fake satanists .

 

This can’t be a serious thought? 

Days until the next Eagles title.....................................................

 

13 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Didn't watch the Grammys but from your descriptions of Sam Smiths "satanic" performance sounds like the illuminati sunk their claws in.

There have been tales over the years of a shadow group in the music industry that promise these " stars" inclusion into their special club and to do so they must go through an initiation. (On stage satanic or sex stuff)

Miley Cyrus grinding with Allen Thicke, Katy Perry with her satanic performance, even Kesha's last music video before she dropped her label and went more independent, where In the lyrics she even mentions getting free of the monsters that control her, that video is all satanic imagery.

Sure people will say it's a crazy conspiracy theory but people say the same about the MK ultra program and the Greenbaum speech.

Either way anytime I see a music artist on  stage do something satanic in nature gives me pause and makes me wonder whose got their claws in them.

As for all the Christian stuff, in your face evangelicals who speak of Jesus worship  and then clutch  their crosses at the site of a homeless person or a person from the LGBTQ are more annoying than showy Hollywood fake satanists .

 

Made sure to wear the eagles super bowl shirt from LII and my eagles hat just to remind my former supervisor that we are in the super bowl. 

 

He's a niners fan 

23 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Maybe not all that interesting, but BwF posed the question: Would you rather the Eagles have the ball down 3 with 2 minutes left or playing defense up 3 with 2 minutes left?

Tough one.

at a micro level you want the lead. One tip sack something and you win. Hold to a fg hopefully

macro level i want to see if hurts can pull that off

Hypothetical here:

Honestly at this point with all the negative opinions about how the Eagles didn't play anyone/got lucky-  If Mahomes somehow gets hurt,and the Eagles Lines dominate and we blow out KC by 38 - 7  There will still be haters saying we got lucky -didn't play anyone etc.... Book it. 

Me I'm hoping for a nice comfortable Win where Hurts throws for 2 TD's runs for 1TD and 1TD's by a RB &  3 FGS's and the Defense has 6 sacks- 2 Int's and a fumble recovery.And everyone on KC stays healthy all game just to shut everyone up.  - But it likely wont happen that way. I am concerned about Mahomes to Kelce and KC's screen game- AR's trickery

 

@LeanMeanGM

Birds 26

KC 24 - 

Bonus KC misses 4th qtr FG that would have won the game. 

MVP Devonta Smith = 11 - 145+ yards 1 TD