Will Anderson, Carter, Gonzalez, or Witherspoon will be there at 10 and Howie will trade down and take Brian Bresee because he wants more picks.

 

We should be rooting for one of the QBs to fall to 10.

2 hours ago, ToastJenkins said:

Agree

still looking for a slot guy that can return kicks

Derius Davis definitely checks the second box.  Has potential as a receiver, but probably not enough to be drafted.  Should be a solid UDFA candidate.

1 hour ago, eagle45 said:

I like Derius Davis around round 5-6, probably closer to 6.  Instantly provides some juice in the return game and could be a bit of a gadget and screen guy for our offense.  Despite the speed, I don't think he'd add much as a deep threat.  

I think the best option for #3 WR and a deep threat is still going to be Watkins.  May not find the opportunity to upgrade that this year.  

I expect him to be a UDFA.  Haven’t seen him projected below 300.  He doesn’t even appear on the mock simulators.

This drill seems like a total waste of time. 

Nebraska WR Trey Palmer 

4.33 forty
 

I like Palmer 

1 hour ago, ToastJenkins said:

Too bad he isnt that great at actually throwing the ball…

I’m surprised that the Josh Allen comparables haven’t been appearing.  When he was coming out of Wyoming the story lines were similar.

45 minutes ago, RLC said:

Getting 4 QBs solidified in the top 10 is great for us. 
One of Skonronski/Anderson/Carter/Gonzalez/Wilson/Witherspoon will be there at 10. 

Jones/Johnson/Skonronski/Anderson/Carter/Gonzalez/Wilson/Witherspoon/Robinson

16 minutes ago, RLC said:

We should be rooting for one of the QBs to fall to 10.

IMO there are 5 teams in front of us that might go QB , that leaves a top 5 non QB for us that should start . teams are texans , colts , seahawks , raiders and panthers. 

Before Mahomes, IMO, arm strength was really overrated in QBs.  Then we had Mahomes going biserk with some of those plays…Josh Allen was right on his heels and Herbert felt like he’d be there soon.

Allen is falling back.  Herbert did too.

Id still take the guy that sits in the pocket and reliably steps into throws.  I have no idea how we reached this point, but that’s Hurts.  

This kid will get some extra looks from teams for showing out where others won't

 

27 minutes ago, RLC said:

We should be rooting for one of the QBs to fall to 10.

Not if Will Anderson is there. Because Howie would trade down instead of taking him.

As an aside, would anyone hypothetically trade pick 30 straight up for a team's 2024 first round pick?

Meaning you'd have even fewer picks this year. But you obviously have a huge upside next year, because the chances of you getting a pick higher than 30 next year are significant. Say a team wants to move up for Njigba or Gibbs.

7 minutes ago, vaeagle2 said:

IMO there are 5 teams in front of us that might go QB , that leaves a top 5 non QB for us that should start . teams are texans , colts , seahawks , raiders and panthers. 

If QBs go 1-4, it's going to push all of the positional talent down.  You'd have to think the Seahawks are drooling over the idea of adding Will Anderson.  Is he still the can't miss prospect that everyone has been talking about the last year plus?  He might be the quietest top prospect for some time.  If the Eagles didn't have Reddick, I would be all over the idea of the Eagles packaging 10 and 30 to get up to pick 5 to nab Anderson.   You could probably trade 10 and 30 for 5 and 83, assuming all teams care about is draft chart value.  But then you'd have Anderson sitting behind Reddick.

I just think no matter who is there at 10, the Eagles have to move down.  There is no sure thing prospect, not that there ever is.  I just the top end talent ins't separated by much and getting those extra picks is more important. 

 

The Bears will be absolutely loving the fuss over Richardson.  Someone will get impatient about getting their guy and want to trade up.

5 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

If QBs go 1-4, it's going to push all of the positional talent down.  You'd have to think the Seahawks are drooling over the idea of adding Will Anderson.  Is he still the can't miss prospect that everyone has been talking about the last year plus?  He might be the quietest top prospect for some time.  If the Eagles didn't have Reddick, I would be all over the idea of the Eagles packaging 10 and 30 to get up to pick 5 to nab Anderson.   You could probably trade 10 and 30 for 5 and 83, assuming all teams care about is draft chart value.  But then you'd have Anderson sitting behind Reddick.

I just think no matter who is there at 10, the Eagles have to move down.  There is no sure thing prospect, not that there ever is.  I just the top end talent ins't separated by much and getting those extra picks is more important. 

how do feel about nolan smith? this guy has reddick written all over him and IMO is moving up

5 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

I didn’t think he ran a second time ?

he first 40 was official 4.43 not 4.40

1 minute ago, Original Sin said:

I didn’t think he ran a second time ?

he first 40 was official 4.43 not 4.40

He didn’t. He’s saying his time is officially 4.43. 

2 minutes ago, vaeagle2 said:

how do feel about nolan smith? this guy has reddick written all over him and IMO is moving up

He testedt through the roof but again with him, he's playing the same position as Reddick.  Now, Reddick only has 2 years left on his deal but do we really want to use more picks on players to not see the field?

I'm looking at the line.  I'm staying on the Van Ness/Kancey bandwagon if they can move down.  

2 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

He testedt through the roof but again with him, he's playing the same position as Reddick.  Now, Reddick only has 2 years left on his deal but do we really want to use more picks on players to not see the field?

I'm looking at the line.  I'm staying on the Van Ness/Kancey bandwagon if they can move down.  

i'm on the fence bout those 2 , might take an OT before them

I’m old enough to remember these same tv experts talking teams into taking Zach BUST Wilson, Mitch Trubisky, Trey Lance etc 🤣🤣

 

Will Levis 😂😂😂

Does anyone remember that TE’s name who was going through a catching drill about 3-4 years ago who took a football directly to the face? 

2 minutes ago, vaeagle2 said:

i'm on the fence bout those 2 , might take an OT before them

Nope, I'm not taking an OT.  Andre Dillard was drafted as a potential replacement and he's walking after 5 years and 9 starts.  I'm not taking an OT to eventually replace Lane Johnson when he's still the best RT in the NFL.  At this rate, he could play another 5 years.  I know he gave a retirement age but I'm not buying that one bit.  He's an ultimate competitor and well, millions of dollars always help.  We can't use two 1st round picks on OTs knowing they are just going to sit.  One was too many.

There will be good OT prospects there but I'm hoping there's a team that wants to move up for one.

1 minute ago, bpac55 said:

Nope, I'm not taking an OT.  Andre Dillard was drafted as a potential replacement and he's walking after 5 years and 9 starts.  I'm not taking an OT to eventually replace Lane Johnson when he's still the best RT in the NFL.  At this rate, he could play another 5 years.  I know he gave a retirement age but I'm not buying that one bit.  He's an ultimate competitor and well, millions of dollars always help.  We can't use two 1st round picks on OTs knowing they are just going to sit.  One was too many.

There will be good OT prospects there but I'm hoping there's a team that wants to move up for one.

Next year maybe but ya