1 minute ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Favorite one I’ve done so far. Howie should be calling me at any moment now 

Gross aside from Tyree

We're drafting at least 1 DL in RD1, maybe 2. Howie will save money by targeting premium positions and locking them down to rookie deals. That's OT/DE/CB.

Gun to my head, we're looking at Nolan Smith and Brents/Forbes/Banks.

19 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

Love the player but do you bench Jurgens again? Or have jones sit a yr before guard and 2 before tackle? Bad resource allocation

 Those players go early and we shouldnt be this high again, but i am think lanes new deal pushes his heir off a year unless you get a raw kid later (with picks we dont have this year but lots of next yr)

I think there’s a definite need to draft an OT at pick 30 or 62. There’s no depth behind Mailata or Lane and both will inevitably miss time. 

2 minutes ago, Texas Eagle said:

Gross aside from Tyree

You’re gross bungsniff 

Just now, EaglePhan1986 said:

You’re gross bungsniff 

Fair enough

3 minutes ago, RLC said:

We're drafting at least 1 DL in RD1, maybe 2. Howie will save money by targeting premium positions and locking them down to rookie deals. That's OT/DE/CB.

Gun to my head, we're looking at Nolan Smith and Brents/Forbes/Banks.

Wonder how Forbes weighing in at 166 lbs will impact his draft stock

Just now, Texas Eagle said:

Wonder how Forbes weighing in at 166 lbs will impact his draft stock

I’d say it would sink it, but he’s too light to even do that. 

2 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

I think there’s a definite need to draft an OT at pick 30 or 62. There’s no depth behind Mailata or Lane and both will inevitably miss time. 

You're prioritizing a backup who won't get an opportunity to be a full time starter until his rookie deal is over? Yes it's to have a backup because Lane tends to get injured but we can't be drafting for insurance that high. We need DE, DT, CB, S, LB, RB, WR this year and next.

Aggyoularr to the Ravens

Just now, Sack that QB said:

Aggyoularr to the Ravens

Perfect fit for them. That offense will be as anemic as it gets without Lamar.

5 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I’d say it would sink it, but he’s too light to even do that. 

Touché

6.5 with incentives. Barely more than Mariota got. Teams for whatever reason didn't think highly of him.

5 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Aggyoularr to the Ravens

 

No wonder Lamar wants out.  They continue to do a terrible job of giving him talent on offense.

I expect Hurts to be extended in the 1st week of April. Any deals signed by March 31st has to have the money put in the escrow account immediately. Any deals after have till March 31st next year.

On 3/21/2023 at 9:44 AM, Utebird said:

No one finds this funny nor knows what you are talking about cuz water polo is lame and no one watches it...😉

The Edmonton Oilers are a professional hockey team, not water polo.

 

17 minutes ago, Texas Eagle said:

Thanks for clarifying that

Your welcome my website friend.

Agholor can be a good slot behind a good 1 and 2.  While Brown and Smith are a really good 1 and 2, they are light on speed.  Agholor really isn’t a deep threat, despite what that one tweet just said.

 

1 minute ago, eagle45 said:

Agholor can be a good slot behind a good 1 and 2.  While Brown and Smith are a really good 1 and 2, they are light on speed.  Agholor really isn’t a deep threat, despite what that one tweet just said.

 

I actually think Agholor now would be a good fit for this offense. Can use him similarly to how they did in 2017. But I think he’s mentally/scarred broken from his time here, so it probably wouldn’t have worked out anyway. 

56 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

JJAW?

Nothing but 12 personnel next season with the 2 best blocking TEs in the business. 

51 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

Love the player but do you bench Jurgens again? Or have jones sit a yr before guard and 2 before tackle? Bad resource allocation

 Those players go early and we shouldnt be this high again, but i am think lanes new deal pushes his heir off a year unless you get a raw kid later (with picks we dont have this year but lots of next yr)

I think it matters on what the Eagles think of that prospect. Just a hypoethical. Not saying they feel this way about this kid. If they are sitting there at 10 and indeed think Paris Johnson Jr. has the chance to be as good as Lane Johnson when he eventually takes over I don’t think that will dissuade them from taking him. I think they would value the fact they believe with stoutland they could another Lane for another decade once lane retires. added bonus, he likely can play guard until that point in time and compete with jurgens.

Jurgens, your already made the pick so the resources were already spent there. So at this point it is what it is. But if you think one of those guys can be almost as good or as good as Lane Johnson, I’m guessing the eagles would covet that type of guy. Granted he’d have to be thought of in that way. Not sure the eagles view someone at 10 in that light. Reason why lane was projected top 5 going into the draft. 

27 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Aggyoularr to the Ravens

I know when i hear Agholor, I think deep threat.  That take has to be click bait, right?

 

25 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

6.5 with incentives. Barely more than Mariota got. Teams for whatever reason didn't think highly of him.

Might be a time where PFF actually got their grade right on CJGJ. Had him as a 63.9 grade even with the 6 picks. I also think teams know he’s a volatile type player. 

Why stop at Agholor? Kick the tires on Hank Baskett.