29 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Yes  - I am allowed to do whatever I want on the internet. 

I am just saying that my sense is that DJ's top 50 often mirrors how he thinks teams in the League value players. I am sure some he had information about where teams ranked him. Johnson didn't have a good year.  So maybe DJ and the Jets were wrong.  

Wrong. You’re on a watchlist now. 

1 hour ago, LeanMeanGM said:

DJ also said Jermaine Johnson was one of the top players in the 2022 class and had him #9 overall in his top 50. He went #26. They get it wrong too. 

Everyone gets some wrong though, this isn't a science

On 3/28/2023 at 4:26 PM, Aerolithe_Lion said:

We made 5 NFCCGs right before we became a Shady-centric offense, and then made 2 more shortly after moving on.

 

May be coincidence, but none of the contemporary feature backs are making it very far in the playoffs. Henry made a AFCCG 4 years ago, Lynch made a couple 10 years ago. That’s about it

My prediction of how the Eagles draft might occur with no trades, but I think O or D line will most likely be the two first round picks if no trades occur.

1 hour ago, ToastJenkins said:

Bc you believe none of what you hear and read in this period

We will see where Van Ness goes on draft day. I believe he goes top 15. Last year the same was said about Travon Walker rising very high and people said no way,  he ended up going 1. 

6 minutes ago, greendestiny27 said:

Everyone gets some wrong though, this isn't a science

That’s my point. They could genuinely believe it. We’ll find out eventually if he’s a top 10 guy or not. 

 

1 hour ago, BigEFly said:

Meh. The 7.5 three cone says a lot.  Not impressive push. Plays like a NT burst wise. Not going to muscle IOL in the NFL.  Maybe a seventh round target.  Howie does love Florida players. 

F'ing 'Gators...

Cardinals getting rid of the red because Gannon defenses don’t get any stops.

24 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

That’s my point. They could genuinely believe it. We’ll find out eventually if he’s a top 10 guy or not. 

exactly, if he ends up going even top 12, then hats off to them. If he goes late teens or later then people can point and laugh 

16 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

 

 

 

Prediction is that it will be awful and will only add to the worry of the upcoming Nike kelly green alt uniforms.  

2 hours ago, Random Reglar said:

Well,   BYU is Division 1,  FBS.

Northern Michigan isn't even Division 1,  FBS or FCS,  it's Division II.

Witt played a year and a part of a year at a DII school at OT.   He was 2nd team Gliac though.

People are putting Witt in their mock drafts here and he's available in the 7th on those mock drafts.

I'd like him, but day 3.  

Yeah he's definitely a day 3 guy possibly UDFA.

1 hour ago, hukdonfoniks said:

 

 

Why are you using spider charts when spider charts are leaving out things like 10 split and 3 cone?

Here's Kancey vs Aaron Donald (future HoF) in RAS compare.

https://ras.football/ras-compare/?&p1=10989&p2=20033&pos=DT

Kancey is better than Donald at - 1) 3 cone 2) shuttle 3) vert 4) 10 split 5) 20 split 6) 40 7) height
Donald is better than Kancey at - 1) broad  2) bench 3) weight 4) arm 5) hand

Aaron Donald was great in college,  but fell to 12 because he was simply TOO SMALL.

Yet,  it didn't matter.

How about this.   Go and find a DT with the hand and arm size you want. As long as he has a 6.82 3 cone and a 10 split of 1.58,  I'll be good with that.   If you can't find that player,   take the one who does have the 6.82 and the 1.58.

It isn't particularly difficult to find a DE or DT with generically good or great RAS numbers.  Kancey happens to be unusually great at short area speed, quickness and agility.

9 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Yeah he's definitely a day 3 guy possibly UDFA.

1.5 years at a Division II school is not enough to be pro ready.  The Eagles don't need pro ready.

I like the idea of trading the 10 down,  picking up pocket change, and taking Kancey with the 15, 20, 25 whatever, and then taking Witt with some new day 3 pocket change.

5 minutes ago, Random Reglar said:

Why are you using spider charts when spider charts are leaving out things like 10 split and 3 cone?

Here's Kancey vs Aaron Donald (future HoF) in RAS compare.

https://ras.football/ras-compare/?&p1=10989&p2=20033&pos=DT

Kancey is better than Donald at - 1) 3 cone 2) shuttle 3) vert 4) 10 split 5) 20 split 6) 40 7) height
Donald is better than Kancey at - 1) broad  2) bench 3) weight 4) arm 5) hand

Aaron Donald was great in college,  but fell to 12 because he was simply TOO SMALL.

Yet,  it didn't matter.

How about this.   Go and find a DT with the hand and arm size you want. As long as he has a 6.82 3 cone and a 10 split of 1.58,  I'll be good with that.   If you can't find that player,   take the one who does have the 6.82 and the 1.58.

It isn't particularly difficult to find a DE or DT with generically good or great RAS numbers.  Kancey happens to be unusually great at short area speed, quickness and agility.

 

15 minutes ago, Random Reglar said:

Why are you using spider charts when spider charts are leaving out things like 10 split and 3 cone?

Here's Kancey vs Aaron Donald (future HoF) in RAS compare.

https://ras.football/ras-compare/?&p1=10989&p2=20033&pos=DT

Kancey is better than Donald at - 1) 3 cone 2) shuttle 3) vert 4) 10 split 5) 20 split 6) 40 7) height
Donald is better than Kancey at - 1) broad  2) bench 3) weight 4) arm 5) hand

Aaron Donald was great in college,  but fell to 12 because he was simply TOO SMALL.

Yet,  it didn't matter.

How about this.   Go and find a DT with the hand and arm size you want. As long as he has a 6.82 3 cone and a 10 split of 1.58,  I'll be good with that.   If you can't find that player,   take the one who does have the 6.82 and the 1.58.

It isn't particularly difficult to find a DE or DT with generically good or great RAS numbers.  Kancey happens to be unusually great at short area speed, quickness and agility.

I'd be interested to know the arm length of some past smaller shorter quicker DTs like Leroi Glover John Randal, Henry Thomas, Michael Dean Perry.

I know Mike Patterson who was only 5'11" listed at 6'0" Reid said he played bigger because he had really  long arms.

Of course comparing smaller guys from the 80s and 90s might not be a good comparison as OL were smaller as well.

 

It took this long to get a blue closer than the one they just had?

1 minute ago, Utebird said:

I'd be interested to know the arm length of some past smaller shorter quicker DTs like Leroi Glover John Randal, Henry Thomas, Michael Dean Perry.

I know Mike Patterson who was only 5'11" listed at 6'0" Reid said he played bigger because he had really  long arms.

Of course comparing smaller guys from the 80s and 90s might not be a good comparison as OL were smaller as well.

 

Do the RAS scores reward height (which can be a disadvantage) and ignore arm length and hand size which are typically advantageous? 

1 hour ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Wrong. You’re on a watchlist now. 

Crap

1 hour ago, JournalistMic said:

My prediction of how the Eagles draft might occur with no trades, but I think O or D line will most likely be the two first round picks if no trades occur.

I’d throw up

I think Anton Harrison is a perfect option for grabbing OL at 30

That’s nuts 

Lol. I’d laugh so hard if the jets deal falls through 

 

4 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

That’s nuts 

 

26 minutes ago, Waiting4Someday said:

Do the RAS scores reward height (which can be a disadvantage) and ignore arm length and hand size which are typically advantageous? 

I'm not sure but that's a legit question?

3 hours ago, RLC said:

That's not what player rankings are. DJ's top 50 are how HE would scout them. It's not a mock draft.

I have nothing to do with that list.