1 hour ago, toolg said:

Oy. Trump has to find a way to combine these opposing forces.

 

 

13 minutes ago, Gannan said:

 

Yeah, how did that go a few weeks ago?  Hmmmm I think Trump took all seven swing states a few hours after the polls closed. You got the mutants at table 9.

41 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Shhhhhh the currently leftists DOJ is suing because they want trans surgeries for minors but it's not a big deal and only Trump people are talking about it

Anyone who doesn't support TN is all the names Paul said the last two pages

 

Paul is raging!  He has full-blown TDS!!

 

Remember when Ben Stein tried to teach us about tariffs?

Nobody listened. Now they're running the country! 

6 hours ago, paco said:

You mean like.... giving it to charity?

Tax write off. 

2 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

I think Biden and Obama are fundamentally decent people who operated in good faith as presidents. 

Trump is a fundamentally unethical person who never operates in good faith and believes he's above the law. 

They are not the same.

Your attempts to equate them morally or ethically are complete fails. 

They're all narcissist 

3 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

LOL again...glass house considering all the abuse of power going on the last 4 years

There's been no abuse of power. At most there's been overly aggressive prosecution at state levels. But not the DoJ.

Plenty of Dems have been getting prosecuted for criminal acts.

The major criticism that Garland receives is that he's not been aggressive enough in prosecuting the case against Trump. The DoJ gave him every chance to quietly transition to post presidential life. But he took classified material and refused to return it. 

What exactly do you think the criminal justice system should do with that situation? Let it go? 

Would you want Trump's DoJ to allow say Hillary Clinton to illegally possess classified material, refuse to return it, then raid her house after 18 mos of attempts to civilly retrieve the documents, and then NOT be prosecuted? Because that's what you're asking. 

It's the right that cries "Russia Russia Russia" now as a deflection for anything criminal Trump does. 

You've allowed yourself to become manipulated then you come here to find willing foils to reinforce your warped worldview.

11 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

There's been no abuse of power. At most there's been overly aggressive prosecution at state levels. But not the DoJ.

Plenty of Dems have been getting prosecuted for criminal acts.

The major criticism that Garland receives is that he's not been aggressive enough in prosecuting the case against Trump. The DoJ gave him every chance to quietly transition to post presidential life. But he took classified material and refused to return it. 

What exactly do you think the criminal justice system should do with that situation? Let it go? 

Would you want Trump's DoJ to allow say Hillary Clinton to illegally possess classified material, refuse to return it, then raid her house after 18 mos of attempts to civilly retrieve the documents, and then NOT be prosecuted? Because that's what you're asking. 

It's the right that cries "Russia Russia Russia" now as a deflection for anything criminal Trump does. 

You've allowed yourself to become manipulated then you come here to find willing foils to reinforce your warped worldview.

Snow, you allow yourself to buy into crap and then continually say I'm being manipulated. We'll just disagree. It is funny though how Tulsi ended up on a list isn't it? Clerical error I'm sure. Jack Smith says hi as well. Oh yeah, the coordination with the prosecutors in the GA case with the White House was nothing either. Yeah, the Durham Report is a thing and the DOJ was used against Trump, and a pretty big deal, so we are going to talk about it often.

The list goes on but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it. The bottom line is people on your side see what they want and ignore what they want. It's a one way street, so we can go round and round but this is where we will always end up.

2 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Yeah, how did that go a few weeks ago?  Hmmmm I think Trump took all seven swing states a few hours after the polls closed. You got the mutants at table 9.

What's taking so long on the final few house races? Recounts or lawsuits? You'd think that 3 weeks would be more than enough time to count the votes. 

All,

Are we allowed to respond to the post above? Please advise.

39 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

All,

Are we allowed to respond to the post above? Please advise.

I, for one, take issue with his casual use of the informal "you're", and find it scandalous in the least.

I mean, what are we? A bunch of scallies?

Clean it up, @VaBeach_Eagle!

1 hour ago, Gannan said:

Are you you talking to me again yet?

I'm getting the feeling we've had a bit of a falling out since I accused you of **** @VanHammersly and @dawkins4prez in a tent.

8 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

Clean it up, @VaBeach_Eagle!

I'm in constant communication with DOGE, we'll see what they say. 

4 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

I'm in constant communication with DOGE, we'll see what they say. 

Will you please aks Elon what it was like to be in the middle of this sandwich?

That's a bloody lot of crazy all in one place. 

Still... good for him.

Good for him.

2 hours ago, Paul852 said:

All,

Are we allowed to respond to the post above? Please advise.

Yeah, just don't be a dick for no reason in your reply cause you are an angry elf 

That isn't you so you should be fine

 

Glad we are unburdened by what might have been

 

 

 

3 weeks later hahahhaa....Dems "count" votes and cheat for as long as it takes when it's close. Funny how tight races where they count for weeks never go the GOP way. 

 

 

20 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

3 weeks later hahahhaa....Dems "count" votes and cheat for as long as it takes when it's close. Funny how tight races where they count for weeks never go the GOP way. 

 

@Procus have the night off?

33 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

3 weeks later hahahhaa....Dems "count" votes and cheat for as long as it takes when it's close. Funny how tight races where they count for weeks never go the GOP way. 

 

STOP THE COUNT! 

Apparently Harris's internal polling never had her with a lead.

😆

8 hours ago, lynched1 said:

Apparently Harris's internal polling never had her with a lead.

😆

What I’ve heard about 2020 is GOP internal polling had Trump losing every state he lost except Georgia.  That’s why he became so fixated on voting in that state even though Republicans run that state’s election.

in other words, Trump knew he was going to lose

18 hours ago, toolg said:

Remember when Ben Stein tried to teach us about tariffs?

Nobody listened. Now they're running the country! 

And all of the sudden, the dreaded MSM is running stories about how tariffs work, and how the American consumer almost always end up paying for them.