14 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said:

I thought paco was 100% maga. Idk where this pro choice, pro gay marriage stuff came from. 

Since you mentioned you are gay, I've been pro gay marriage long before Obama changed his stance to run for reelection on.  Let's say since college where one of my closests friends, roommate and fraternity brother was a gay guy.

 

I'd suggest filtering out the few sad individuals I referenced in the previous post.  They are notorious for spinning a narrative to attack others here not rooted in reality.

Liberals here are aligned with Fuentes

Just now, paco said:

Since you mentioned you are gay, I've been pro gay marriage long before Obama changed his stance to run for reelection on.  Let's say college where one of my closests friends, roommate and fraternity brother was a gay guy.

READ:  Paco smoked pole in college, may actually lean Democrat.

Just now, Procus said:

Liberals here are aligned with Fuentes

Donald Trump dined with white nationalist, Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/25/trump-white-nationalist-nick-fuentes-kanye-00070825Donald Trump dined with white nationalist, Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes

Uh oh...and that's why they didn't let her do media interviews until her internals showed she was in trouble

Jill is some place laughing

 

1 minute ago, paco said:

Well, I don't "lean MAGA", and I don't necessarily agree with the first half of your OR statement either.  So I think it's that there are a few sad individuals who REALLY need this and hang on to or attack any comment that crosses their little red line.

Then I think you suffer from some form delusion rooted in something I don't understand because even I don't think it's that deep for anyone on here, even the crazy MAGA nutters. The fact that you actively choose to believe a reality that there are people on here out to get you instead of acknowledging a clear observation multiple people have made then 🤷‍♂️

7 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

@Mike31mt this true?

Lol man lefties are sickos. Not even sure where this came from but I do love how you dream of wielding taxpayer dollars as a weapon against poor people.

WV was literally created during the civil war by seceding from pro-slavery Virginia to join the Union.  Dems used to at least pretend to care about Appalachia and the blue collar workers.  But now that theyre no longer interested in raping Appalachia of coal they have the same perspective you do: "f 'em".  And that's why it's a red state now.

Regardless, even in this hypothetical, what would WV have to lose?  Being poor?  Oh no, what would that be like?? 

9 minutes ago, paco said:

Well, I don't "lean MAGA"

Didn't your wife say you high-fived her after Trump won in 2016? That's a little bit more than a "lean".

9 minutes ago, paco said:

Well, I don't "lean MAGA", and I don't necessarily agree with the first half of your OR statement either.  So I think it's that there are a few sad individuals who REALLY need this and hang on to or attack any comment that crosses their little red line.

There is no middle ground in here. You are with Harris or you are going to be attacked

1 minute ago, Mike31mt said:

Lol man lefties are sickos. Not even sure where this came from but I do love how you dream of wielding taxpayer dollars as a weapon against poor people.

WV was literally created during the civil war by seceding from pro-slavery Virginia to join the Union.  Dems used to at least pretend to care about Appalachia and the blue collar workers.  But now that theyre no longer interested in raping Appalachia of coal they have the same perspective you do: "f 'em".  And that's why it's a red state now.

Regardless, even in this hypothetical, what would WV have to lose?  Being poor?  Oh no, what would that be like?? 

Yeah, I agree, it's a federally dependent sheethole.

1 minute ago, mayanh8 said:

Then I think you suffer from some form delusion rooted in something I don't understand because even I don't think it's that deep for anyone on here, even the crazy MAGA nutters. The fact that you actively choose to believe a reality that there are people on here out to get you instead of acknowledging a clear observation multiple people have made then 🤷‍♂️

No, I'm always reading paco's post. Just waiting in the shadows for him to slip up. Then I pounce!

39 minutes ago, dawkins4prez said:

Betas don't marry. We have GF's, that cheat on us. Trump and his Elon/Vance/Jr./RFK gang have got the incel market cornered. Talk politics on any gaming site if you need proof.

no

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Didn't your wife say you high-fived her after Trump won in 2016? That's a little bit more than a "lean".

He may be pro-gay and pro-choice but he enjoys a good troll job just like anyone else 

2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

Yeah, I agree, it's a federally dependent sheethole.

Courtesy of years of Democrat control.  Crazy how that happens and why they don't like Dems coming in and ishing on the state 

5 minutes ago, paco said:

Since you mentioned you are gay, I've been pro gay marriage long before Obama changed his stance to run for reelection on.  Let's say college where one of my closests friends, roommate and fraternity brother was a gay guy.

 

I'd suggest filtering out the few sad individuals I referenced in the previous post.  They are notorious for spinning a narrative to attack others here not rooted in reality.

 

1 minute ago, mayanh8 said:

Then I think you suffer from some form delusion rooted in something I don't understand because even I don't think it's that deep for anyone on here, even the crazy MAGA nutters. The fact that you actively choose to believe a reality that there are people on here out to get you instead of acknowledging a clear observation multiple people have made then 🤷‍♂️

I only quoted the last 2 posts but I find this entire exchange hilarious. I disagree with Paco quite a bit on politics and surrounding topics (teachers/public education, for example).  But I feel like he has posted much more negative stuff about the GOP/trumpism and Trump/MAGA over the last couple of years than he has posted against liberals/dems. Yet I agree with him that everytime he or anyone posts anything that isn’t strictly 100% any-Trump they’re jumped on by the same handful of posters for it despite any amount of anti-Trump/pro-democrat posting they might do. 
 

Just my observation from the sidelines. 

1 minute ago, Paul852 said:

He may be pro-gay and pro-choice but he enjoys a good troll job just like anyone else 

  Who can forget all those pro-choice posts paco's made over the years. Some would say he's as staunch as anyone ever when it comes to defending a woman's right to choose!

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Didn't your wife say you high-fived her after Trump won in 2016? That's a little bit more than a "lean".

(Temporarily pausing my ignore WGB policy)

Yup.  I remain very anti-Clinton to this day.  I gave Trump the benefit of the doubt and thought maybe he would surround himself with "the best people" and do a good job.  And some of his policies at the time I could get behind.

He proved me wrong and the way he handled the pandemic was atrocious.  So I wrote in Romney in 2020 and, like I've stated here before, am doing that again.

I get why that went over your head, Tiny Tool.

(and back to ignoring you)

There are plenty of people who post anti Democrat/Kamala that do it just for the reaction as opposed to being pro MAGA. I get it. Sometimes you just want to annoy people that are fun to annoy. It's why I have my current profile picture 😬

5 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

No, I'm always reading paco's post. Just waiting in the shadows for him to slip up. Then I pounce!

You must have the tan of an albino, because I never miss Paul

 

2 minutes ago, paco said:

Since you mentioned you are gay, I've been pro gay marriage long before Obama changed his stance to run for reelection on.  Let's say college where one of my closests friends, roommate and fraternity brother was a gay guy.

Not trying to offend in any way. Just honestly assumed you were MAGA based on what I’ve seen. I also only came to these parts for the past few months so 🤷‍♂️. 
 

Either way, thank you for not being homophobic. Some people here see a gay person online and go insane. 

Just now, paco said:

(Temporarily pausing my ignore WGB policy)

Yup.  I remain very anti-Clinton to this day.  I gave Trump the benefit of the doubt and thought maybe he would surround himself with "the best people" and do a good job.  And some of his policies at the time I could get behind.

He proved me wrong and the way he handled the pandemic was atrocious.  So I wrote in Romney in 2020 and, like I've stated here before, am doing that again.

I get why that went over your head, Tiny Tool.

(and back to ignoring you)

You have always been MAGA. You were lying. You are lying. You are a horrible human. You are a traitor. You believe Pluto is a planet.

2 minutes ago, paco said:

Yup. 

4 minutes ago, Imp81318 said:

 

I only quoted the last 2 posts but I find this entire exchange hilarious. I disagree with Paco quite a bit on politics and surrounding topics (teachers/public education, for example).  But I feel like he has posted much more negative stuff about the GOP/trumpism and Trump/MAGA over the last couple of years than he has posted against liberals/dems. Yet I agree with him that everytime he or anyone posts anything that isn’t strictly 100% any-Trump they’re jumped on by the same handful of posters for it despite any amount of anti-Trump/pro-democrat posting they might do. 
 

Just my observation from the sidelines. 

Ok leftists... we've been waiting for this one. You know what to do. Getem!!

6 minutes ago, paco said:

Since you mentioned you are gay, I've been pro gay marriage long before Obama changed his stance to run for reelection on.  Let's say college where one of my closests friends, roommate and fraternity brother was a gay guy.

I'd suggest filtering out the few sad individuals I referenced in the previous post.  They are notorious for spinning a narrative to attack others here not rooted in reality.

A bit off topic here, but okay, I'll bite.

Marriage as a concept is a sexual union and/or a union of love between two people.  It's also a financial union in terms of property rights and for federal tax purposes. 

Historically, marriage has been reserved for unions between a man and a woman - and that concept has worked well for thousands of years.  Not sure how state approval validates a love union.

That being said, there should be no impediment to a financial union between people who live together.  It's why domestic partnerships should be enacted.  If two people live together, why shouldn't they be entitled to the financial benefits of a marriage.  And this should apply regardless of romantic involvement.  If two siblings have lived together for years, why should they be denied the rights to a domestic partnership?  Why should the domestic partnership only apply to people who are having sex or who are in love with each other?

The concept of gay marriage falls apart once you factor polygamy into the equation.  Why shouldn't a man be allowed to have multiple wives - or for that matter, why shouldn't a woman be entitled to multiple husbands?  Or, if you have a threesome of men, why shouldn't all three be entitled to get married?  You'll trigger a liberal by pointing this out.