1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

Smart decision on his part 

1 hour ago, EricAllenPick6 said:

This is really only barely an exaggeration.  "How many super bowls will we win now that Dan Snyder sold the team?"  

Vegas odds for the number of wins for the Commanders is 6.5, and I think that might be high.  Gotta wonder if the fans are still gonna be showing up when the Commanders are sporting a 3-10 record.  

I live in DC and there’s been a lot of pain for those poor ****. Think 1990-2010 eagles, but take every good year and most good games. 

19 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

He misses the Eagles and faces the Cowboys. Its a real shame.

2 hours ago, DelEagles1984 said:

His last games were A titans team that gave up, twice, one of the worst teams in the league with the Jets, a Lamar-less Ravens team, the Texans, which was the worst team in the league and the owboys, who we know are frauds.

So yea, I'm unimpressed 

I have no issue saying you don’t believe in the jags. However your reasoning for Minnesota is BS if you are gonna use what you are against the jags. they are a bigger fraud than the jags and cowboys. The Vikings barely beat the jets and gave up 22 points to an awful jets offense in that game. the jets defense last year wasn’t the issue it was their offense

cowboys are frauds but Minnesota got their ass handed to them 40-3. So what does that say about your Minnesota pick? 

also lamar Jackson played for the ravens in that jags game. So again wrong on that point. He was 16-32 for 254 yards and a 1 td. Qb rating of 87.2.  ran for 89 yards 

Again kirk cousins is the epitome of hallow stats if we are gonna say Lawrence had hallow stats.  you are impressed enough with Minnesota to make that your choice? The team that got destroyed 24-7 vs. eagles, cowboys 40-3, lions (whom you call overrated) 34-23 and GB 41-17. and then lost to the giants at home in the wild card. Minnesota’s 3 best victories were giants, bills and dolphins. Jags beat the chargers (2x), cowboys and ravens (WITH LAMAR). Jags vs. playoff teams 4-4 and the Vikings were 3-3. 

The Vikings were he biggest frauds last year. Everyone said it all year and they proved it in the playoffs. The Vikings schedule wasn’t all that hard either. They got the bears twice and the cardinals. Last 6 weeks the Vikings had bears, colts, jets. Two of the worst teams in the league. To start the year jags have the 23rd hardest schedule and Minnesota has 18th. So based off schedule it would favor the jags this year 

2 hours ago, SkippyX said:

The Colts were 9-6 with 2 games to play. 1 win means the playoffs.

Wentz threw for 180 in a 23-20 loss to the Raiders but no worries. They had the 2-14 Jags next.

He played one of the worst play-in games in NFL history.

Anyone calling Wentz good in Indy was not paying attention.  He was statistically mediocre (13th in passer rating and ANY/A). He was a bad QB.

 

His first 2 starts in DC were very good. In his last 5 starts in DC the team scored 8, 10, 17, 12, and 10 points for 11.4 per game.

The 32nd offense in the NFL (Denver) Scored 16.9 per game.

 

 

^ I think this is the problem I see with Wentz Haters, specifically Eagles fans. Just biased and cherry pick stats, or games that they want to bring up.

Fairly unbiased here, because I remember those games(not vividly) but also remember when he went into Arizona and New England back to back weeks and won against 2 playoff games. Also remember how he threw up a ton of points against the Texans and Ravens(I think) but his defense couldnt stop anyone and ended up losing like 40-34 in over time both games. 

End of the day he probably had close to 4000 yards that year, 30ish? TD's and 5 or 6 INT's.  if that "sucks"  70% of the QB's should retire 

 

 

18 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I have no issue saying you don’t believe in the jags. However your reasoning for Minnesota is BS if you are gonna use what you are against the jags. they are a bigger fraud than the jags and cowboys. The Vikings barely beat the jets and gave up 22 points to an awful jets offense in that game. the jets defense last year wasn’t the issue it was their offense

cowboys are frauds but Minnesota got their ass handed to them 40-3. So what does that say about your Minnesota pick? 

also lamar Jackson played for the ravens in that jags game. So again wrong on that point. He was 16-32 for 254 yards and a 1 td. Qb rating of 87.2.  ran for 89 yards 

Again kirk cousins is the epitome of hallow stats if we are gonna say Lawrence had hallow stats.  you are impressed enough with Minnesota to make that your choice? The team that got destroyed 24-7 vs. eagles, cowboys 40-3, lions (whom you call overrated) 34-23 and GB 41-17. and then lost to the giants at home in the wild card. Minnesota’s 3 best victories were giants, bills and dolphins. Jags beat the chargers (2x), cowboys and ravens (WITH LAMAR). Jags vs. playoff teams 4-4 and the Vikings were 3-3. 

The Vikings were he biggest frauds last year. Everyone said it all year and they proved it in the playoffs. The Vikings schedule wasn’t all that hard either. They got the bears twice and the cardinals. Last 6 weeks the Vikings had bears, colts, jets. Two of the worst teams in the league. To start the year jags have the 23rd hardest schedule and Minnesota has 18th. So based off schedule it would favor the jags this year 

My reasoning for picking the Vikings over the Jags THIS YEAR, is because the NFC is the easier of the two division. The NFC North got worse. The NFC North faces the NFC south (Easier schedule) while the AFC south got tougher, The AFC is harder in whole. 

You brought up how "on fire" Trever was last year, I just pointed out why I was unimpressed. 

Just now, DelEagles1984 said:

My reasoning for picking the Vikings over the Jags THIS YEAR, is because the NFC is the easier of the two division. The NFC North got worse. The NFC North faces the NFC south (Easier schedule) while the AFC south got tougher, The AFC is harder in whole. 

You brought up how "on fire" Trever was last year, I just pointed out why I was unimpressed. 

I'm not  dying on the Vikings hill, but we should all agree they have a similar team to the jags(if not a bit more talent) and an easier path than the Jags

2 minutes ago, DelEagles1984 said:

I'm not  dying on the Vikings hill, but we should all agree they have a similar team to the jags(if not a bit more talent) and an easier path than the Jags

2 minutes ago, DelEagles1984 said:

I'm not  dying on the Vikings hill, but we should all agree they have a similar team to the jags(if not a bit more talent) and an easier path than the Jags

The NFC North is harder than the AFC South. Houston, Indy and Tennessee probably will all be starting rookie QBs by week 9. The NFC North has the Lions, Bears (who people are high on for some reason, I think they are still trash) and a wildcard with the Jordan Love Packers. The Jags also get to play the NFC South, which is also horrible. Meanwhile, Minny gets the AFC West...

13 minutes ago, DelEagles1984 said:

My reasoning for picking the Vikings over the Jags THIS YEAR, is because the NFC is the easier of the two division. The NFC North got worse. The NFC North faces the NFC south (Easier schedule) while the AFC south got tougher, The AFC is harder in whole. 

You brought up how "on fire" Trever was last year, I just pointed out why I was unimpressed. 

SOS to start the year has Vikings schedule as 18th and jags is 23rd. So technically jags easier schedule. Also every time vikings played one of the better teams in the nfc (who are likely still top 3 in the nfc) they got their ass handed to them. The only thing Minnesota has going for them it’s easier to make the playoffs in the NFC. They’re not beating the Eagles, Niners or cowboys if those team stay healthy. Not saying the jags can beat the bengals or chiefs but they were at least in games with the eagles, chiefs (2x)  

Afc south is as bad as the nfc north.  Also, the Jaguars actually added talent and got better this off-season. Minnesota lost some guys and added. Likely gonna be worse cause they were ridiculous in 1 score games that usually doesn’t hold two consecutive years. They aren’t gonna win some of the games they squeaked by all year. It’s exactly what bit them in the ass against the giants. 
 

@DelEagles1984 If you want people to take you seriously, defending the Vikings in here is a terrible way to start  

2 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

The NFC North is harder than the AFC South. Houston, Indy and Tennessee probably will all be starting rookie QBs by week 9. The NFC North has the Lions, Bears (who people are high on for some reason, I think they are still trash) and a wildcard with the Jordan Love Packers. The Jags also get to play the NFC South, which is also horrible. Meanwhile, Minny gets the AFC West...

I think you're forgetting how hard it is to play football when it is hot outside and that's why the AFC South is much tougher.  

8 minutes ago, DelEagles1984 said:

I'm not  dying on the Vikings hill, but we should all agree they have a similar team to the jags(if not a bit more talent) and an easier path than the Jags

Vikings should die on boats not hills. 

Are the Cowboys for real with this guy?  It looks like somebody's toddler got loose on the field

 

7 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

@DelEagles1984 If you want people to take you seriously, defending the Vikings in here is a terrible way to start  

The Vikings were the biggest fraud team in the entire NFL last year. And cousins is the king of hallow QB stats. I don’t mind if people don’t want to take the Jaguars in the question I asked. But Minnesota has the same things going against them that he just used against the jags. Only thing Minnesota has is it’s easier to make the playoffs in the nfc. However if we are using strictly that I’d take the lions over them as their roster with the additions they made is better 

2 hours ago, Mike030270 said:

This is all because you mentioned he who must not be named on here

2 minutes ago, DelEagles1984 said:

^ I think this is the problem I see with Wentz Haters, specifically Eagles fans. Just biased and cherry pick stats, or games that they want to bring up.

Fairly unbiased here, because I remember those games(not vividly) but also remember when he went into Arizona and New England back to back weeks and won against 2 playoff games. Also remember how he threw up a ton of points against the Texans and Ravens(I think) but his defense couldnt stop anyone and ended up losing like 40-34 in over time both games. 

End of the day he probably had close to 4000 yards that year, 30ish? TD's and 5 or 6 INT's.  if that "sucks"  70% of the QB's should retire 

 

 

Ignorance is not a defense.

He had a playoff game vs a 2-14 Jags team and he sucked.

Reich, the entire football world, and we agree.

Anyone defending him knows nothing about the NFL. He's a pariah on merit.

 

Here are the 2 games you picked. 

5 for 12 for 57 yards with a TD and a pick vs NE. Their RBs ran for 209 yards.

22 whole points vs Arizona in December 2022. Arizona was 2-4 from December on and lost to 3-13-1 Detroit 30-12 in Arizona. (6 days before playing the Colts)

That DOA 'playoff team' lost 34-11 in those playoffs.

 

2 hours ago, ManuManu said:

Fun fact: Jalen Hurts only completed 2.7 passes per game in the fourth quarter last season. 

The eagles in the second half of a lot of games were blowing teams out and didn’t throw as much. Also if you look at the offense in the 20 games, they had more points in the second half as opposed to the first half in just 4 of 20 games. The eagles averaged 18.5 points in the first half. In the second half they averaged 10.6 points.  Also eagles scored 20 or more points in the first half 13 of 20 games (all 3 playoff games) and in the second half of games just 1 of 20. 

note some of this is game was out of reach and not trying to score as much and waste clock in the second half and some was they struggled some weeks in the second half. 

Eagles coaches wanted to take the ball out of Hurts hands to preserve the win

28 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

@DelEagles1984 If you want people to take you seriously, defending the Vikings in here is a terrible way to start  

I think the AFC is the better confernce.

I think the Titans are really good and the bears, and Packers are trash

Not too far fetched. 

6 minutes ago, DelEagles1984 said:

I think the AFC is the better confernce.

I think the Titans are really good and the bears, and Packers are trash

Not too far fetched. 

How are the titans really good? The same titans that the jags beat twice down the stretch and lost to the Texans down the stretch (whom we agree and you said suck in the jags discussion) and lost their last 7 games last year to finish at 7-10. Who knows if tannehill stays healthy or what he is anymore. Might be willis or Levis at some point and we saw them not even try to throw with willis 

38 minutes ago, Cliftoma said:

Are the Cowboys for real with this guy?  It looks like somebody's toddler got loose on the field

 

That's too funny.  Dude looks like Dark Helmet from Spaceballs.  

1 minute ago, EricAllenPick6 said:

That's too funny.  Dude looks like Dark Helmet from Spaceballs.  

 

14 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

How are the titans really good? The same titans that the jags beat twice down the stretch and lost to the Texans down the stretch (whom we agree and you said suck in the jags discussion) and lost their last 7 games last year to finish at 7-10. Who knows if tannehill stays healthy or what he is anymore. Might be willis or Levis at some point and we saw them not even try to throw with willis 

Supposedly Willis has been really putting in the work this off season and Levis so far has been horrific. I had a bad feeling about Levis before the draft. 

13 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

Supposedly Willis has been really putting in the work this off season and Levis so far has been horrific. I had a bad feeling about Levis before the draft. 

I feel like the titans are done with willis. Could’ve started him at the end of the year and went out and picked up dobbs instead. Then drafted levis and rumors tried to move up for him. I think if tannehill gets hurt or is done they might just go with levis. I think some of them building up willis is potentially for trade purposes