Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

  • Replies 17k
  • Views 494.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • LeanMeanGM
    LeanMeanGM

    Just for the Blog I'm going to power rank all 300 of Harper's home runs

  • I hope all the dads here had a wonderful fathers day

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, paco said:

Thank you.  Got notice about 30 seconds ago he is in recovery :thumbsup:  

 

 

Man, he is going to be PISSED when we have to take him back in to get his balls chopped.

Lol yeah, I remember when I got my dog neutered, he was a boxer almost 2 years old, after the anesthesia wore off he kept looking between his legs all confused, he knew there used to be something there and they weren't and he couldn't figure out where they went😄

5 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Kempski thinks Waitman is a no brainer of Siposs.  

Waitman is pretty strong and left footed. Belicheck loved that idea to gain every little competive edge. Very reluctantly let him go. Says more about Baringer, as he was a draft pick.

31 minutes ago, GoEagles5921 said:

Nolan Smith obviously has a serious injury.  I wouldn’t expect to see him until after week 8

Nothing obvious about it.

20 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Curious what we could get for Barnett

South Park- Ima Need About Tree Fiddy" Art Board Print for Sale by  Girldoodle | Redbubble

9 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Kempski thinks Waitman is a no brainer of Siposs.  

He's been on 6 teams the last three years. 

2 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

The amazing thing about that letter, is not just the eloquence with which he unpacks the actual NEED for the atrocities of war to be brought to bear on Georgia (here, specifically on Atlanta) with the most limited loss of life possible, by giving them free passage out of Atlanta before moving in... but the fact that he builds the case 'in haste' as he puts it at the bottom of the letter.  He didn't have a chance to draft and redraft and revise... but maybe one dictation given and a few edits along the way, but I would conjecture the whole thing was done in less than an hour, possibly considerably shorter than even that.

I agree and I think that's why it's super insightful as to his mindset.  He probably sets forth the clearest reasoning for the war from the North's perspective.  If they don't fight the rebellion, the US will be faced with perpetual conflict like Mexico.  This is significant not just because of the fear over continued internal conflict but really a justifiable fear that European conflicts would direct the US and Confederate states that remained.  The context of Mexico is that Napolean 3 had invited Maxmillian to become the Emperor of Mexico.  This was set up because Mexico could not pay its post revolution debts.  

7 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

He can say that but thumbs are kind of important to pass rushers 

Hopefully it doesn't hamper his production too much...

I'd take him over Opeta

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

He's been on 6 teams the last three years. 

That's 5 more teams than Siposs would make. 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

He's been on 6 teams the last three years. 

Must be a really nice guy.

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

I'd take him over Opeta

He played well this pre-season and would be a good fit.  

Fans of Birds with Friends will find this inteeresting

7 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Lol yeah, I remember when I got my dog neutered, he was a boxer almost 2 years old, after the anesthesia wore off he kept looking between his legs all confused, he knew there used to be something there and they weren't and he couldn't figure out where they went😄

Kelce should have about a 50% easier time. Only one of his nuts dropped.  I told schmoopie we should have named him Kruk :lol: 

3 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

He played well this pre-season and would be a good fit.  

Looks like his played some tackle and guard, so that couldn't hurt 

  • Author
5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

He's been on 6 teams the last three years. 

So he has popularity going for him....

7 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

He's been on 6 teams the last three years. 

He's in demand!

11 minutes ago, jojodancer said:

Waitman is pretty strong and left footed. Belicheck loved that idea to gain every little competive edge. Very reluctantly let him go. Says more about Baringer, as he was a draft pick.

Left footed and black, dudes a punter unicorn!

32 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Because they want to see how guys play during real returns.  Not fair catches.

That might explain why teams would return a ball that lands short of the goal line rather than fair catch it. But it wouldn't account for the kicking team's hitting the ball into the endzone. Heck, all four of Elliott's kickoffs against the Colts were hit into the endzone, three of them out of the back.

23 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

No way, this is the most they will get:

 

image.png.339e03252dcedba72ce9f70cf6213784.png

Whoa whoa whoa… Those crackers are amazing. 

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Whoa whoa whoa… Those crackers are amazing. 

I mean it's a pack of nabs.  

1 hour ago, NCiggles said:

Kempski thinks Waitman is a no brainer of Siposs.  

The guy has been waived about six times in three years and only punted for the Steelers briefly when their starter was out. [Edit: I guess he also punted for the Broncos last year.]

I'm curious what anyone sees in him other than he's "notSiposs".

32 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

No idea who this guy is

He punted for the Bears for years.

29 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

No way, this is the most they will get:

 

image.png.339e03252dcedba72ce9f70cf6213784.png

Lance was already traded to the Cowboys 

3 minutes ago, FranklinFldEBUpper said:

The guy has been waived about six times in three years and only punted for the Steelers briefly when their starter was out.

I'm curious what anyone sees in him other than he's "notSiposs".

Isn't that enough?

7 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I agree and I think that's why it's super insightful as to his mindset.  He probably sets forth the clearest reasoning for the war from the North's perspective.  If they don't fight the rebellion, the US will be faced with perpetual conflict like Mexico.  This is significant not just because of the fear over continued internal conflict but really a justifiable fear that European conflicts would direct the US and Confederate states that remained.  The context of Mexico is that Napolean 3 had invited Maxmillian to become the Emperor of Mexico.  This was set up because Mexico could not pay its post revolution debts.  

Along those same lines, that was part of the thinking in the Revolutionary War as well... the conclusion was that they had to either rebel together as a single unit... or to remain as they are... together.  The claim was that if they acted independently and not as a single unit in the revolution, they'd just replay the bloody history of war as had worked out in Europe.  The colonies were relatively independent, but they figured out pretty quick and they couldn't survive like that.  The Join or Die Flag highlights that thinking as well.  Even in that though... there were Tories who fought on the side of the British... and it was a bit of a 'civil war' in its own right of northerners (who were more largely in favor of independence) fighting southerners (who had more loyalties to the crown).  

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.