Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Iggles25 said:

Four swings and misses unless Byard goes on a tear in the playoffs 

He may have a nice big play INT at some point if he gets lucky or a good read, but it’s clear he’s toast.  

  • Replies 46k
  • Views 985.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

This is why I blame Siri.  You aren’t going to go 3/3 on OCs. Steichen was it.  Brian Johnson isn’t…but what if he was?  He’s instantly gone for a HC job.  Then we are on OC #3.  It was just a matter of time until things fell off without Siri being capable of managing this himself.

14 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

This is why I blame Siri.  You aren’t going to go 3/3 on OCs. Steichen was it.  Brian Johnson isn’t…but what if he was?  He’s instantly gone for a HC job.  Then we are on OC #3.  It was just a matter of time until things fell off without Siri being capable of managing this himself.

What has inspired any fragment of confidence in BJ this season?

Would rather take a chance on someone outside the fray.

Just now, Iggles25 said:

What has inspired any fragment of confidence in BJ this season?

Would rather take a chance on someone outside the fray.

I would too…but if we get a better OC, have a great 2024…then they are a HC in 2025 and our offense is back to square 1.  The HC needs to be able to be the constant.  

1 minute ago, eagle45 said:

I would too…but if we get a better OC, have a great 2024…then they are a HC in 2025 and our offense is back to square 1.  The HC needs to be able to be the constant.  

Makes sense.

It is a feedback loop that doesn't equate to success.

3 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

Maxey has 40 but we have no answer defensively for Sengun. Really frustrating game in the closing minutes now. 

They do have answer.  They just score more points than they allow the other team to score.  This sports thing is so easy, I should be a coach.   

This is the best Sixers team since their 2018-19 team.  Will be interesting what Morey does at the deadline.  He has clearly been planning for beyond this year but the Sixers are perfectly suited to make a big move this year if it is worthwhile and becomes available.  I was saying early season when the Suns started slow and it is becoming even more so realistic now that the Sixers land Durant at the deadline.  He would be the perfect fit with Embiid and Maxey.  All time great that is a killer and a champion.  Doesn't have to be and won't be the best player on the team but can be lethal in the clutch.  Suns are so far over the luxury after that awful Beal trade and being over the luxury is going to really screw teams when it comes to signing buyout players after the deadline.  Having Tobias and a lot of other expiring contracts along with some good draft assets will be appealing to the Suns.  

 

Embiid and Durant have also had a lengthy and public admiration for each other's game.

 

kd-sixers.jpg

AJ if he was forced to talk to the media.

 

 

9 hours ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

When’s Foles coming back to save us?

He is already saving the Browns.

Saturday Morning Predictions Update

31 predictions recorded thus far.  26 for an Eagles win and 5 for a Cardinals win.  The Average Predicted Score is Eagles 30 Cardinals 20, which is just under the Eagles -10.5 vs. Cardinals line put up by Las Vegas.

As always, please tag your prediction post with @mattwill that way I will be sure to see/record it.  Score predictions can also have an optional "Bonus Pick" tiebreaker prediction.  So far over the course of the season 142 different EMB posters have made at least one prediction. 

A list of the predictions is presented below, sorted alphabetically by the name of the predictor.  If you don't see your name there, then I either missed yours or you haven't submitted one yet.

1993262848_Screenshot2023-12-30at1_41_42AM.png.6cb446ed50bae6dd07a31eefd6378ed9.png
1198342264_Screenshot2023-12-30at1_42_01AM.png.2a92a4f3c1705e925afab35b129c9ca3.png

@mattwill

Little birds 23

Big birds 31

 

Bonus:  defensive score for Eagles.

7 hours ago, Iggles25 said:

I'm all for keeping Sirianni.

But both coordinators are replaceable.

Sometimes you hit on those hires.

Eagles didn't.

Johnson and Desai aren't ready for primetime.

Don't waste this roster. The window will slam shut while they learn on the job.

We don't even have a full roster. Our back end on defense is aging clearly, and our LBs are patchwork. On top of that, we have two OL in the twilight of their career that will go down as Eagles greats that aren't very far from retirement. Replacing the coordinators? Sure. But the bottom line here is that the fans over-estimated the actual quality of the roster to begin with - they got too hype about being first in the NFL for as long as we were, and now immediately think the roster is amazing and we're super talented as a team. 

We do clearly have talent on our roster, yes, but it's certainly not last year's team. And last but not least, something tells me the amount of teams that win a Super Bowl the same year they get both a new offensive and defensive coordinator in the same offseason isn't that high, and we'd be doing that two years in a row. I guess we don't have many options, but that's certainly a challenging pill to swallow.

@mattwill

Eagles 31-26

Carter 3 sacks 

The Byard trade is a net positive. Not saying it's a home run, but it's a trade we'd redo with hindsight.

8 hours ago, eagle45 said:

I think Hurts shares more of the burden of this blame than anyone acknowledges. But from the pure coaching standpoint….if your HC isn’t smart enough and isn’t good enough with scheme, X/Os, or play calling that it all falls on the OC…..it’s going to be a bumpy ride for the offense.  Because every time you have real success, that OC is gone for a HC job and then things get messy.

It happened with Doug without his OC and it’s happening with Siri.  You can’t have a HC that is this reliant on the OC.

 

 This doesn't make a lot of sense. Consider this:

Does that mean that every defensive coach ever is doomed to fail because offensive coordinators will always leaver for greener pastures? That's obviously not true.

Additionally, does that mean it's impossible for an offensive coach to maintain a good defense because the defensive coordinators will always leave? This is also not true.

The answer is one that's existed for a long time: You get an older coordinator who isn't a heavily sought after hire, because right now the trend is 'young guns with a lot of grass ahead of them' as a head coach. Young coaches generally do not have a lot of cards in their pocket. If the first offense they learned is mostly ineffective by later tape, it's often the only offense they learned. As a result, they struggle.

This is why young coaches tend to either be pretty good, or suck really badly and get fired in a couple years. The fix to this is pairing them up with older coordinators, like I described above, that help them grow their understanding. Football is a team sport, and it's a team sport with the coaches too unless you have somebody like modern Andy Reid or Kyle Shanahan. But those guys don't grow on trees so I don't think we'll be finding the next one of those any time soon.

8 hours ago, Iggles25 said:

Four swings and misses unless Byard goes on a tear in the playoffs 

While I agree that Byard has underperformed (I pushed back when someone here called him a top-5 safety in the league before the trade :lol: ) the picks were gave up for him weren't 3rd or 4th rounders. Giving up a 5th + 6th and a slug in Edmunds was worth a shot.

23-20 Eagles, another cringe game 

What the actual F is this guy even talking about?? This is the guy running the offense 🤦‍♂️

 

Screenshot_20231230_081504_Facebook.jpg

@mattwill

Eagles 34

Cards 17 

Josh Sweat gets a sack

52 minutes ago, AmericanEagle77 said:

 

 This doesn't make a lot of sense. Consider this:

Does that mean that every defensive coach ever is doomed to fail because offensive coordinators will always leaver for greener pastures? That's obviously not true.

Additionally, does that mean it's impossible for an offensive coach to maintain a good defense because the defensive coordinators will always leave? This is also not true.

The answer is one that's existed for a long time: You get an older coordinator who isn't a heavily sought after hire, because right now the trend is 'young guns with a lot of grass ahead of them' as a head coach. Young coaches generally do not have a lot of cards in their pocket. If the first offense they learned is mostly ineffective by later tape, it's often the only offense they learned. As a result, they struggle.

This is why young coaches tend to either be pretty good, or suck really badly and get fired in a couple years. The fix to this is pairing them up with older coordinators, like I described above, that help them grow their understanding. Football is a team sport, and it's a team sport with the coaches too unless you have somebody like modern Andy Reid or Kyle Shanahan. But those guys don't grow on trees so I don't think we'll be finding the next one of those any time soon.

Finding good coordinators with no aspirations to be HC is likely difficult regardless of age. Seems like coaches like we had in JJ are rare. As soon as guys get nominal success it seems like they suddenly become eligible for HC positions.

3 minutes ago, Cliftoma said:

What the actual F is this guy even talking about?? This is the guy running the offense 🤦‍♂️

 

Screenshot_20231230_081504_Facebook.jpg

Hmmm…

Part 1 is about how a RPO could be run or pass, and they rarely call structured run/pass plays in this scheme. Well, the issue here is that the defense can predetermine run/pass by giving you certain pre-snap alignments… so who’s really calling the plays here.

Part 2 is the argument of calling a game to get ahead of the sticks versus being aggressive and taking shots for explosive plays. I worry that the issues with part 1, put us behind the sticks as we have too many wasted plays (as the defense can maneuver our offense into low percentage plays situationally).

17 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

While I agree that Byard has underperformed (I pushed back when someone here called him a top-5 safety in the league before the trade :lol: ) the picks were gave up for him weren't 3rd or 4th rounders. Giving up a 5th + 6th and a slug in Edmunds was worth a shot.

I'd usually agree that sending a 5th and 6th aren't a big deal but as of today, the only picks they actually have are:

1st, 2nd, 2nd (NO), 5th and conditional 6th from Kentavious Street that is going to end up a 7th because he played 5 of the 6 games needed and is on IR.

Now, they are projected to have a 3rd and 3 5th round comp picks but I'm not banking on them until they are actually handed out. 

This is the current draft pick value chart, which includes projected comp picks. I'm a firm believer that the 4th round is where you really need to build your team. You still have top, fringe level players here. There is a huge gap between picks for the Eagles, which is a trend I've pointed out in the past. Things can and will change between now and the draft but I absolutely hate when the Eagles go for rounds between picks. If this is how the draft laid out, there are almost 2 "rounds" worth of players selected between the Eagles 3rd and 5th round picks.

I don't think Byard has done enough to warrant 2 draft picks, no matter where they are. 5 5th round picks and 2 6th round picks would give them much better ammo to get in to the 4th round, but again, we all know Howie will move up and down as he pleases. 

RD1   RD2   RD3   RD4   RD5   RD6   RD7  
PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM  
  1  CHI 3000   33  CAR 580   65  CAR 265   102  CAR 92   137  CLE 37.5   179  JAX 19.8   222  TEN 2.6
  2  ARI 2600   34  ARI 560   66  ARI 260   103  ARI 88   138  CLE 37   180  CAR 19.4   223  HOU 2.3
  3  WAS 2200   35  WAS 550   67  WAS 255   104  WAS 86   139  WAS 36.5   181  WAS 19   224  WAS 2
  4  NE 1800   36  NE 540   68  NE 250   105  NE 84   140  NE 36   182  MIN 18.6   225  LV 1.8
  5  NYG 1700   37  NYG 530   69  NYG 245   106  NYG 82   141  NYG 35.5   183  NYG 18.2   226  ARI 1.6
  6  LAC 1600   38  LAC 520   70  LAC 240   107  LAC 80   142  LAC 35   184  NE 17.8   227  LAC 1.4
  7  TEN 1500   39  TEN 510   71  ARI 235   108  TEN 78   143  CAR 34.5   185  TEN 17.4   228  LV 1.2
  8  CHI 1400   40  WAS 500   72  CHI 230   109  CHI 76   144  CHI 34   186  MIA 17   229  NE 1
  9  NYJ 1350   41  GB 490   73  NYJ 225   110  NYJ 74   145  DEN 33.5   187  NYJ 16.6   230  BAL 1
  10  ATL 1300   42  ATL 480   74  ATL 220   111  ATL 72   146  ATL 33   188  PHI 16.2   231  CLE 1
  11  NO 1250   43  PHI 470   75  DEN 215   112  JAX 70   147  NO 32.6   189  HOU 15.8   232  SF 1
  12  GB 1200   44  GB 460   76  GB 210   113  GB 68   148  BUF 32.3   190  GB 15.4   233  GB 1
  13  LV 1150   45  LV 450   77  LV 205   114  LV 66   149  LV 31.8   191  LV 15   234  DAL 1
  14  DEN 1100   46  NO 440   78  DEN 200   115  NYJ 64   150  DEN 31.4   192  LAR 14.6   235  DEN 1
  15  MIN 1050   47  MIN 430   79  DET 195   116  MIN 62   151  PHI 31   193  ARI 14.2   236  LV 1
  16  ARI 1000   48  HOU 420   80  ARI 190   117  HOU 60   152  ARI 30.6   194  CLE 13.8   237  HOU 1
  17  PIT 950   49  PIT 410   81  PIT 185   118  PIT 58   153  LAR 30.2   195  PIT 13.4   238  PIT 1
  18  CIN 900   50  CIN 400   82  CIN 180   119  CIN 56   154  CIN 29.8   196  CIN 13   239  CIN 1
  19  IND 875   51  IND 390   83  IND 175   120  IND 54   155  IND 29.4   197  IND 12.6   240  IND 1
  20  TB 850   52  TB 380   84  TB 170   121  TB 52   156  TEN 29   198  TB 12.2   241  TB 1
  21  SEA 800   53  NYG 370   85  DEN 165   122  SEA 50   157  SEA 28.6   199  TEN 11.8   242  SEA 1
  22  JAX 780   54  JAX 360   86  JAX 160   123  ATL 49   158  JAX 28.2   200  MIN 11.4   243  JAX 1
  23  LAR 760   55  LAR 350   87  LAR 155   124  PIT 48   159  LAR 27.8   201  BUF 11   244  LAR 1
  24  BUF 740   56  BUF 340   88  GB 150   125  BUF 47   160  BUF 27.4   202  BUF 10.6   245  BUF 1
  25  KC 720   57  KC 330   89  KC 145   126  KC 46   161  MIN 27   203  LV 10.2   246  HOU 1
  26  DAL 700   58  DAL 320   90  DAL 140   127  SF 45   162  KC 26.6   204  BUF 9.8   247  DAL 1
  27  HOU 680   59  CLE 310   91  CLE 136   128  HOU 44   163  MIN 26.2   205  ATL 9.4   248  ARI 1
  28  DET 660   60  DET 300   92  DET 132   129  MIN 43   164  DET 25.8   206  DET 9   249  DET 1
  29  MIA 640   61  MIA 292   93  MIA 128   130  DEN 42   165  MIA 25.4   207  MIA 8.6   250  MIA 1
  30  PHI 620   62  PHI 284   94  HOU 124   131  CHI 41   166  ARI 25   208  NO 8.2   251  SEA 1
  31  SF 600   63  SF 276   95  WAS 120   132  SF 40   167  SF 24.6   209  DEN 7.8   252  SF 1
  32  BAL 590   64  BAL 270   96  BAL 116   133  BAL 39.5   168  BAL 24.2   210  CLE 7.4   253  BAL 1
                97  JAX 112   134  ARI 39   169  NO 23.8   211  JAX 7   254  CIN 1
                98  PHI 108   135  BAL 38.5   170  PHI 23.4   212  LAR 6.6   255  NYJ 1
                99  SF 104   136  GB 38   171  PHI 23   213  DAL 6.2   256  NYJ 1
                100  BUF 100          172  NO 22.6   214  SF 5.8   257  LAC 1
                101  SF 96          173  KC 22.2   215  SF 5.4       
                              174  DAL 21.8   216  GB 5       
                              175  NO 21.4   217  LAR 4.6       
                              176  SF 21   218  LAR 4.2       
                              177  CIN 20.6   219  GB 3.8       
                              178  PHI 20.2   220  LAR 3.4       
                                     221  TB 3     

@mattwill

 

Eagles 31

Cardinals 20

 

Swift with 140+ yards rushing and a TD

15 minutes ago, Cliftoma said:

What the actual F is this guy even talking about?? This is the guy running the offense 🤦‍♂️

 

Screenshot_20231230_081504_Facebook.jpg

To sum up, it sounds  like they are relying more on Hurts do decide at the line or mid-play instead of the OC actually calling good plays. 

Also sticks out like a sore thumb to me that he said "let's play for a 3rd down". This is what I've been saying all year and I said the EXACT same thing earlier this week. The Eagles would rather play for a 3rd down instead of going for the 1st down. He is basically calling this offense to get in to QB sneak range. 

20 minutes ago, Cliftoma said:

What the actual F is this guy even talking about?? This is the guy running the offense 🤦‍♂️

 

Screenshot_20231230_081504_Facebook.jpg

Pretty clear to me. First part is about options out of the plays he calls. Meaning could be run or pass based on what the QB sees at the LOS. So they aren't calling straight up pass plays and run plays. This is what I have problems with. I feel like sometimes you should take the option of pass away and just run it with the RB for example. This is their scheme though.

The other part is about decisions on third down being situational based on the down and distance. ie 2nd and long the better play may be to play for third down meaning get what you can because a 20 yard play isn't always realistic on 2nd and 20. Though they do have players that can do it the better analytics play may be to try to get a chunk of it on 2nd then the rest on 3rd or 4th since they have the unstoppable shove.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.