Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Ongoing Eagles New Discussion volume 2

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

When the market gets flooded with WR's they won't be paying out. Same thing happened with RB's. Simple supply and demad

Nah....the RB didn't get paid because people realized they could get a decent committee for cheap.  

A committee of WRs isn't as good as one stud.  The WRs are going to get paid.  Everyone is waiting for Jefferson. 

It's why the Eagles could extend Dickerson by kinda setting the market,  but have to wait for Smith. 

Dickerson is arguably the best G... or one of.  Smith is a level behind the guys that are due for their first big contract....Jefferson and Lamb. 

  • Replies 77.9k
  • Views 1.5m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

  • Author
6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He was drafted to be exactly that though, right?

WHO was???

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yet it says he can start in 2 years. Once again it's a wasted first pick if you have to sit him 2 years(and even then there are no guarantees) What it Lane wants to play after 2 more years and he's already 1/2 way through his rookie deal??? You going to can Lane for him??? Very stupid move. 1 year ok,,2 is a waste of a pick when you can do that the following year 

He can compete and probably win the RG spot in the meantime.  

  • Author
6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He was drafted to be exactly that though, right?

IDK who you are talking about? If we have our RG when why do we need to draft a T/G in round 1?

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yet it says he can start in 2 years. Once again it's a wasted first pick if you have to sit him 2 years(and even then there are no guarantees) What it Lane wants to play after 2 more years and he's already 1/2 way through his rookie deal??? You going to can Lane for him??? Very stupid move. 1 year ok,,2 is a waste of a pick when you can do that the following year 

They need a guy to play RG now...they need Lane's replacement in 2027... if the same guy does both....that's who they need to draft. 

  • Author
6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Is it too much to assume our big FA pickup and our first round pick will be expected to both be out there over 50 percent of the time?

So Lanes replacement is going to play 50%???

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Lanes replacement is going to play 50%???

He is talking about Huff and Smith

  • Author
6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Really wouldn’t surprise me at all if he’s the choice.

I would me at 22. That's a reach for a guy who's sitting

  • Author
6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Think you mean his brother obviously 

Tua is the QB for the fins,this IS his brother-jebus

  • Author
3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

He is talking about Huff and Smith

I never know because his posts are all over the damn map

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

I never know because his posts are all over the damn map

True 

  • Author
9 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Nah....the RB didn't get paid because people realized they could get a decent committee for cheap.  

A committee of WRs isn't as good as one stud.  The WRs are going to get paid.  Everyone is waiting for Jefferson. 

It's why the Eagles could extend Dickerson by kinda setting the market,  but have to wait for Smith. 

Dickerson is arguably the best G... or one of.  Smith is a level behind the guys that are due for their first big contract....Jefferson and Lamb. 

Nah it's supply and demand. If they keep cranking our Marvin Harrisons there is no need to overpay one,just draft one on a 5 year rookie deal like JJ was

  • Author
12 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

He can compete and probably win the RG spot in the meantime.  

I suppose so,but 22 is too high for him. As I said before, if we moved back to like 30-32 or even dropped out of round 1 and got him I would be ok,but 22 is too high IMO. If you're going to do THAT,then move UP and get the better talent.

  • Author
6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

 

Guyton is a rare athlete for an offensive tackle. He is a former defensive end and didn't start playing offensive tackle until he got to college. That inexperience is still visible.

His strike targets to defenders' bodies are inconsistent, as is his hand placement. This has made him more of a pusher than a blocker. Still, his natural physical ability is evident.

Guyton’s foot speed and stride length for a player of his size are impressive, allowing him to mirror without overextending. He can fire off the ball quickly, giving him a good punch at contact.

But Huff can't play LB ever, even though he was one once, because he is "strictly a pass rusher"  lmao. I love the hypocrisy. What if Huff could play LB/DE and we got Latu?? No way to scheme both in on certain plays?? Rotate 3 edge guys to keep them fresher??

12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Nah it's supply and demand. If they keep cranking our Marvin Harrisons there is no need to overpay one,just draft one on a 5 year rookie deal like JJ was

There is no supply of top level #1 WRs.  Game changers that require you to double team them.   It's different than RB.   

  • Author
Just now, joemas6 said:

There is no supply of top level #1 WRs.  Game changers that require you to double team them.   It's different than RB.   

How many yards did "rookie" JJ get?? If they crank out a continuous supply of those, the contracts will fall because there is no reason to pay one when you can get JJ' s in every draft

  • Author

OSU alone cranks out top level WR's almost every year

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Why would we put them in that situation together...unless it's in the 3-4?   We are going to use the 3-4 front....don't you think we will use that vs the run and not in obvious passing downs?

And let's be honest... those running situations are the perfect time to use one of Graham and Sweat on the edges.  

You go 4 man front, that's more suited for those 2 than the 3-4.

Like you are focused on such a minimum amount... like the few screens to Goedert. 

You have 60-70 plays per game usually .. you have to worry about the majority not the rare plays. 

So zero concern from you over our top two edge players facing the run being on the field together as an obvious weakness?

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

WHO was???

Steen T/G third round pick just last draft

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Tua is the QB for the fins,this IS his brother-jebus

You’re the one who posted about bringing in the undrafted player that replaced Hurts. Made no sense. I was just helping you out here.

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

How many yards did "rookie" JJ get?? If they crank out a continuous supply of those, the contracts will fall because there is no reason to pay one when you can get JJ' s in every draft

Or Justin Jefferson will sign a shattering huge contract

4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

How many yards did "rookie" JJ get?? If they crank out a continuous supply of those, the contracts will fall because there is no reason to pay one when you can get JJ' s in every draft

If they continue to crank out Tom Brady and Mahomes... teams could just draft a QB???   There is continuous supply of elite players.  

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So zero concern from you over our top two edge players facing the run being on the field together as an obvious weakness?

Zero... because they can't run the ball in two different places at the same time.   They cam only run it at one of them.    I don't expect Smith/ Huff combo to be out on the field with a 4 man line on running downs.     Not really a difficult concept to get is it?

I'll reverse it for you.    Are you concerned with the pass rush when Davis, Carter and Milton are out on the field together? 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So zero concern from you over our top two edge players facing the run being on the field together as an obvious weakness?

They run the Nickel that you are obsessed about...   Huff/ Carter/ Davis / Milton/ Smith.... white/ Maddox.... with your 2 CBs and 2 Safeties.  

You so concerned with the run D of Smith and Huff at the same time.  Or more so Maddox / White?   

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.