April 17, 20241 yr Author No moves,no frills,but he's tough as nails. He will bang you. Good body control. Not fast or shifty. he just gets you out of jams. A really good TE2 prospect
April 17, 20241 yr Philly’s 2024 first-round pick (No. 22 overall), 2024 second-round pick (No. 53 overall), 2024 fifth-round pick (No. 172 overall) and 2025 third-round pick to Chicago in exchange for No. 9. Would you make this trade?
April 17, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Philly’s 2024 first-round pick (No. 22 overall), 2024 second-round pick (No. 53 overall), 2024 fifth-round pick (No. 172 overall) and 2025 third-round pick to Chicago in exchange for No. 9. Would you make this trade? 1. Absolutely never until pick 9 is on the clock ... you never trade this for a spot...you trade for a specific player. 2. Which player is your target? For this package is it a QB, WR or DL? The other positions you don't give up that much.
April 17, 20241 yr Author 8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Philly’s 2024 first-round pick (No. 22 overall), 2024 second-round pick (No. 53 overall), 2024 fifth-round pick (No. 172 overall) and 2025 third-round pick to Chicago in exchange for No. 9. Would you make this trade? No,too much talent in this draft to start losing picks. If anything I trade back if it's possible to get your guy
April 17, 20241 yr 59 minutes ago, joemas6 said: 1. Absolutely never until pick 9 is on the clock ... you never trade this for a spot...you trade for a specific player. 2. Which player is your target? For this package is it a QB, WR or DL? The other positions you don't give up that much. With the thinking of possibly four QBs off the board before the pick…at 9 we’d be essentially looking at a top 5 player on our Big Board.
April 17, 20241 yr 12 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: With the thinking of possibly four QBs off the board before the pick…at 9 we’d be essentially looking at a top 5 player on our Big Board. So you don't have the specific player in mind... just trading to trade?
April 17, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, joemas6 said: So you don't have the specific player in mind... just trading to trade? Top 5 on Big Board isn’t enough?
April 17, 20241 yr Gotta love Hurts on Sportcenter talking about the energy Saquon brings into the room - would be nice to hear Hurts get out of that laid back crap and show some energy!
April 17, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Top 5 on Big Board isn’t enough? No... not before seeing who is available. If you want a trade... you set it up... then when 8 is on the clock you get team 9 on the phone....finalize it as soon as you see who is there. What's significance does top 5 have for you over top 4 , top 6, top 8 etc? Should be about a specific player.
April 17, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: No... not before seeing who is available. If you want a trade... you set it up... then when 8 is on the clock you get team 9 on the phone....finalize it as soon as you see who is there. What's significance does top 5 have for you over top 4 , top 6, top 8 etc? Should be about a specific player. Me inserting my own ranking of player I’m not sure really serves any purpose. I’d personally trade up for this guy or that. At 9 all kinds of top talent elite prospects to covet. But what matters is Rosie’s Big Board. For him to grab any player in his top 5 has massive value to me.
April 17, 20241 yr 47 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Me inserting my own ranking of player I’m not sure really serves any purpose. I’d personally trade up for this guy or that. At 9 all kinds of top talent elite prospects to covet. But what matters is Rosie’s Big Board. For him to grab any player in his top 5 has massive value to me. But you never give up that package without knowing exactly which player you are going to get. Player #5 could never much lower than player #4 on their board...who knows? Go look at last year's draft ... Carter with pick 9. Would you make that trade up for him? Then look at evety player in front of him...what if the draft went a different way...would you trade that package for all those players? Can't do it without knowing who is there.
April 17, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, joemas6 said: But you never give up that package without knowing exactly which player you are going to get. Player #5 could never much lower than player #4 on their board...who knows? Go look at last year's draft ... Carter with pick 9. Would you make that trade up for him? Then look at evety player in front of him...what if the draft went a different way...would you trade that package for all those players? Can't do it without knowing who is there. I’d agree with your logic and thoughts here on many trade scenarios. But …top 5 on your Big Board? That guy should very clearly be a stud…or your scouting stinks.
April 17, 20241 yr Top tier elite players in this draft for me would probably be: 2 CBs Arnold and Mitchell, TE Bowers, 4 WR Harrison/Nabers/Odunze/Thomas, T Alt
April 17, 20241 yr 24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: I’d agree with your logic and thoughts here on many trade scenarios. But …top 5 on your Big Board? That guy should very clearly be a stud…or your scouting stinks. Say it's an OT or a WR.
April 17, 20241 yr Author 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Top 5 on Big Board isn’t enough? And losing all those other prospects? Very stupid. Top 5 in college is an automatic top 5 in the pros? You should know better by now that there are no guarantees. How did Wentz work out for you?
April 17, 20241 yr Author 5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Jags at 17 almost just have to draft a WR. Feel they are trading up to do so. Why?
April 17, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: And losing all those other prospects? Very stupid. Top 5 in college is an automatic top 5 in the pros? You should know better by now that there are no guarantees. How did Wentz work out for you? I’d pull the trigger on that trade
April 17, 20241 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: I’d pull the trigger on that trade We did for Wentz. If he panned out your boy would not be playing. You're essntially giving up your entire draft for ONE GUY. Very stupid and I want to know the "genius" that pondered this BS and wrote the article, so I can avoid him in the future
April 17, 20241 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: Why? Ridley left. Christian Kirk about all they have at WR. I wouldn’t settle for that if I was their GM. I’d make sure I got Trevor the weapon so he could make things happen.
April 17, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: We did for Wentz. If he panned out your boy would not be playing. You're essntially giving up your entire draft for ONE GUY. Very stupid Giving up one of the two second round picks we have…and a fifth. Key adding on a pick from next year’s draft. Which I have no problem doing to be going ‘all in!’
April 17, 20241 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Giving up one of the two second round picks we have…and a fifth. Key adding on a pick from next year’s draft. Which I have no problem doing to be going ‘all in!’ Far from giving up our whole lot of draft picks.
April 17, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: We did for Wentz. If he panned out your boy would not be playing. You're essntially giving up your entire draft for ONE GUY. Very stupid I see it as an easily affordable price for us to pay
April 17, 20241 yr Author 4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Ridley left. Christian Kirk about all they have at WR. I wouldn’t settle for that if I was their GM. I’d make sure I got Trevor the weapon so he could make things happen. They will probably take more than 1. They need Oline or Lawrence won't be able to throw to ANYONE. Nothing wrong with the WR's available at 17
April 17, 20241 yr Author 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Far from giving up our whole lot of draft picks. And a 2025 also
Create an account or sign in to comment