28 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So what if we fired Siri and Hired Bellicheat,just forfeit all our picks and change the logo to a white flag?

Pretty rare to hear about interviewing guys for a job that has t been vacated yet. Usually you fire the guy…THEN interview for the opening.

27 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Perhaps asking about Mayo as a DC? 

Sadly it’s been leaked Bellicheat had his coaching staff already in place. Would have meant sticking with Patricia. That actually maybe was the real straw to break the camels back.

Chargers working out DJ Chark. he is a solid receiver. Not great,but not terrible

23 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

In Hurts defense,Shew went 0-2 and Hurts went 1-4 down the stretch. but he still lost to a 3 win team when we heeded the W

Just he lost…our coaches and the rest of the team finished undefeated.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just he lost…our coaches and the rest of the team finished undefeated.

When your leader fails, you go down with the ship. The captain steered us into an iceberg

25 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

In Hurts defense,Shew went 0-2 and Hurts went 1-4 down the stretch. but he still lost to a 3 win team when we heeded the W

Team clearly hasn’t been capable of winning without Hurts. That’s just fact. 

23 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Let me clear it up for you.We signed Bark BEFORE we had Belicheat IN. You cannot "go back"

You aren’t following the conversation…again. Separate the two subjects. Do you sign a vet RB to a top dollar contract if you don’t view yourself as a contender? My answer is no…in the first place. Signing Saquan to me was an All In move.

31 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

And 2 easy seasons in a row didn't help huh?

Sure plenty of factors helped. Siri not be a leading helping factor here though. He has some redeemable qualities…but really more proven as a liability.

29 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Lol... are you serious in the fact that it's not obvious he would want to be the Czar wherever he goes.   At least right away. 

It’s been known he wasn’t asking for personnel control with the Falcons. Also known he was willing to step back control with the Pats.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You aren’t following the conversation…again. Separate the two subjects. Do you sign a vet RB to a top dollar contract if you don’t view yourself as a contender? My answer is no…in the first place. Signing Saquan to me was an All In move.

All in you sign a 3 year contract????

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

In Hurts defense,Shew went 0-2 and Hurts went 1-4 down the stretch. but he still lost to a 3 win team when we heeded the W

So in your eyes Hurts was the reasoning we couldn’t punch our way out of a wet paper bag to end last season?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It’s been known he wasn’t asking for personnel control with the Falcons. Also known he was willing to step back control with the Pats.

he never asked for personla control here either the EGGALES FELT he would want that, he NEVER SAID IT

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

So in your eyes Hurts was the reasoning we couldn’t punch our way out of a wet paper back to end last season?

Sure

30 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why would you NOT???? You improved a position(quite a bit too)

There you go. Now that’s the appropriate question. Is the goal to try and achieve 9 wins and just be competitive? Or are we trying to win Championships? If you aren’t contending …then signing Saquan just lowers our draft pick while eating up cap.

Even Hurts said "It's on me" and it is,yet you don't believe what you own guy tells you

30 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We should have moved up to 5 in 2011 and gave up the round 6 pick where we got Kelce,because there was a STUD up there

For Patrick Peterson, Julio Jones or JJ Watt? very interesting thought.

35 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So once again the deflection instead of understanding the point. We don't have 4 HC's

So the ‘norm’ is to interview coaches before you fire the current ones under contract?

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Pollard wasn’t worth the money he would have commanded at his peak right then. Yet the Cowboys were trying to win the SB last season. So it was wise to not sign Pollard long term at top dollar…like they were considering.

Was absolutely stupid move. 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So the ‘norm’ is to interview coaches before you fire the current ones under contract?

But you are calling it an interview... who else is calling it that?

11 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

There you go. Now that’s the appropriate question. Is the goal to try and achieve 9 wins and just be competitive? Or are we trying to win Championships? If you aren’t contending …then signing Saquan just lowers our draft pick while eating up cap.

Howie is giving Hurts the best weapons he can find for success over the next 3 years(when Hurts contact comes up). Signing Bark for 3 years provides continuity at the position. We extended Smith for the same reason. Howie needs an excuse to letm Hurts go if he needs to and he is providing the best weapons for him. if he fails,we know where the problem lies. Hurts neds to stop the excuses and get it done. There is zero reason for him to fail. if the defense gives up too much and we lose,so be it if Hurts balls out. Hurts was a Howie pick and he doesn't want to look bad,but he will find another QB if Hurts cannot produce the desired result in the next 3 years

22 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sadly it’s been leaked Bellicheat had his coaching staff already in place. Would have meant sticking with Patricia. That actually maybe was the real straw to break the camels back.

You reading bleacher report too much. 

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So the ‘norm’ is to interview coaches before you fire the current ones under contract?

If you think it will improve your team sure. You have to check it out and thats what we did. It also lights a fire under Siris butt.Failure and collapse is no longer an option

42 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why would you NOT???? You improved a position(quite a bit too)

We traded our best defender away

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We traded our best defender away

Thought you wanted to save cap space?

8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

There you go. Now that’s the appropriate question. Is the goal to try and achieve 9 wins and just be competitive? Or are we trying to win Championships? If you aren’t contending …then signing Saquan just lowers our draft pick while eating up cap.

Here is your issue.

1.  We made two great trades. Steals with Miami and Saints... you = it was all for a QB

2. We extend Smith ( obvious move)  you = let's trade AJ

3.  We signed Barkley to 3 year deal ( half the cap hit of Pollard)   you = We are all in let's mortgage the future 

Why can't obvious good moves, simply be obvious good moves?   The trade extended Smith and signing Barkley are all good moves... all more than just one year. 

Like every little thing has to be exaggerated into something extreme ALL THE TIME!!!