3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Our WR's-Aj 151 yards in 4 games, Smitty 158. This is the best tandem in the league although you'd never know it

No disrespect, but why are you so hell bent about this? Smith has not said a word. Dude is a stud. AJ is a stud. He shared some frustrations.

I was very frustrated during and immediately after the game about how pathetic the passing game is. But I was even more concerned about the poor running game for a team known for its talented OLine and the best RB in football. Barkley isn’t whining.

I’m worried the lack of effectiveness is going to catch up to this team, OR they will get some things figured out.

Just saying, you have posted 100 times or so the SAME message. We got it! How about sharing some things you’d like to see the team do? You have and make great points. I do agree with a lot you say, so no need to get pissed at me. We are all Eagles fans here.

@mattwill All my high school buddies….mid to late 80’s were donkey fans. I HATED them! Even faked being a Raider fan just to piss them off.

Eagles get their poop together and score 40. Donkeys have a turnover problem and score 17. Barkley scores 2 TDs!

Peyton Manning throws no TDs. Just wanted to get my layup prediction in too. Haha

44 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I disagree. Break thinks down specifically most all times

Never with specific solutions. Only descriptions of what you see as the problems.

45 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Defending SB champs. Returning stud O personnel intact. Can’t ask for a more attractive job to offer the BEST

Who do you believe are the BEST? Names Ham, names. Flesh and blood people who you believe match your criteria.

You are very good at complaining, but never want to contribute what you believe are possible specific solutions.

48 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah…when it comes to The Brotherly Shove…I believe that has been Siri baby

Evidence that supports that belief?

46 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Receivers weren’t open. A.J. Brown, understandably frustrated with a gameplan that featured nothin but curls, verticals and the occasional in-breaker, voiced that frustration after the game.

From BG.com

Look at the videos of AJ’s targets. He absolutely was open when he made his comeback turn. But the ball wasn’t there when he turned. He had to wait for the ball to arrive, and during that wait time the CB was able to drive on the catch point with the result that at the time the ball arrived he was no longer open.

23 minutes ago, Senhorcook said:

@mattwill All my high school buddies….mid to late 80’s were donkey fans. I HATED them! Even faked being a Raider fan just to piss them off.

Eagles get their poop together and score 40. Donkeys have a turnover problem and score 17. Barkley scores 2 TDs!

Peyton Manning throws no TDs. Just wanted to get my layup prediction in too. Haha

Love those layups. Your 40-17 is recorded.

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

Even if true, how did that lost game or two affect the season outcome?

It didn't. . But Ham concerns himself with the making of his movie... not so much what happens on the field. A press conference or any other off the field away from the game is irrelevant....if they mattered then Andy Reid or Bill Belichek would never have won anything....two of the absolute worst in front of the mic

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Doesn’t mean he’s always perfect

You constantly point out all the imperfections....it's your mission in life. If 31 other team's fans had the opportunity to swap their GM for Howie... how many do you think would instantly do it... you think closer to 25 or 31?

Which GM would you instantly swap him for with the idea that your choice would give a better chance at the most Superbowls for the Eagles?

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

Nitpicking is a rac-ist term. I have pointed that out to you multiple times, but you continue using that rac-ist term. Why?

With that said, the EMB software doesn’t allow the word rac-ist (without the hyphen) to appear and changes it to the word boob.

Matt.. you are losing us here on this one....move on

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Playing Man

Like how Campbell got burned on Sunday?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I disagree. Break thinks down specifically most all times

You never ever give a solution.... I agree with your post months ago where you stated that " I'm not the best in expressing myself " I think you may have an occasional solution...you just choose not to type it because complaining is your thing.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Defending SB champs. Returning stud O personnel intact. Can’t ask for a more attractive job to offer the BEST

5th in scoring in 2024.... 7th now...including...an hour weather delay... 2 games at Arrowhead and Tampa vs the great D minds... and half a game where Stout had Pryor at RT

Let's not forget.. the OL from last year was more physical at the guard spots by a mile. Half of Dickerson and Steen is a tactical player not a people mover.

Plus this year the bullseye is there unlike last year.

So far it hasn't been easy. Denver D up next. Much more fun than 2022 or 2023 with that easy schedule until the end of 2023. Already started off vs quality defenses. And quality QBs.

3 revenge games too.

For 14 years we heard " any win in this league...times yours, lets go get a cheeseburger etc..."

Some of that was a little bit of a stretch...but this year 4 nice tests so far. Missing Carter, Goedert, Lane and Nolan respectively too.

4-0

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We aren’t a rebuilding team with time to develop and suffer an unqualified OC.

He's been here 5 years. You are saying he wasn't vetted?

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Issue is these issues have existed while Patullo was here as passing game coordinator. So …how much time you giving Patullo to judge whether he is good enough or not?

As much time as Lurie wants. I don't fire people ,neither do you

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We are very much a win now team and situation

We're winning now? After 4 games we should be 10-0? LOL

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s a cover story. It’s flat out worse and weaker…and not even a shell of what we just had last season:

Basically ALL the same guys on offense?

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I thought he did good," Fangio said on Tuesday. "I mean, he can be better, the true test for him will be to see how he improves, but overall, he did good. He was pretty sticky in man coverage. I'd like to see his tackling improve. One thing a guy has to learn that has played predominantly special teams is tackling on defense is a lot different than tackling in special teams. But I'm confident he can improve that." 

Care to enlighten us as to who is is talking about or should we just guess? LOL

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Does Evans play defense,

You keep hammering that we lost to TB before because we didn't have AJ. Does AJ play defense?

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Remind me who won the Superbowl last year...and remind me what you thought our record would be at this point?

IDK I never guessed what our record would be at this point. All I said was our first 5 games are tough,so I have zero clue who you are talking about. So far I have posted Eagles wins on EVERY week of Matts board?

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Sure you can.. go on your ESPN Fantasy site... look at flex players... week 4 stats...click targets and you can see very easily.

Idk if you played fantasy before they have what is called " add/ drops... you can research players stats from weeks prior to see if they are worth considering to add to your roster. For me, I look at targets as one of the factors in determining if that player is worth it.

Yeah I'm going to do that for every player, you look it up. I posted a link that shows more targets for other top guys. Whats even more insane is the yards they got as opposed to AJ. 151 over 4 games and one game was 109,which is a whopping 42 yards in 3 other games. combined

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

9 targets... would be 153 targets for the season. Did you check yet to see how many guys got that 9 targets week 4.

I already posted that link,go back and read it. I'm not doing a damn spread sheet for you. If he gets 40 targets a game and totals 3 yards who really cares???? The fact is,we have no deep threat until Hurts proves otherwise. I would rather he have 3 targets per game for 40 yards each. Our deep threat doesn't exist

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Sure you can.. go on your ESPN Fantasy site... look at flex players... week 4 stats...click targets and you can see very easily.

Idk if you played fantasy before they have what is called " add/ drops... you can research players stats from weeks prior to see if they are worth considering to add to your roster. For me, I look at targets as one of the factors in determining if that player is worth it.

You should also look at receptions and yardage

3 hours ago, mattwill said:

What evidence do you have that supports that opinion of yours?

PG-Precision Guesswork

2 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

No disrespect, but why are you so hell bent about this? Smith has not said a word. Dude is a stud. AJ is a stud. He shared some frustrations.

I was very frustrated during and immediately after the game about how pathetic the passing game is. But I was even more concerned about the poor running game for a team known for its talented OLine and the best RB in football. Barkley isn’t whining.

I’m worried the lack of effectiveness is going to catch up to this team, OR they will get some things figured out.

Just saying, you have posted 100 times or so the SAME message. We got it! How about sharing some things you’d like to see the team do? You have and make great points. I do agree with a lot you say, so no need to get pissed at me. We are all Eagles fans here.

I never said a thing about Smitty saying anything.. I keep trying to move on about it,but others keep bugging me with the same posts I already answered. The rest of your post is what I also said. So since you brought it up I have to post about it AGAIN. so make it 101 times now