6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You want a guy standing still to catch a player running full speed in a yard?

Yep,that's what he expects LOL

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s his leg on the right of the screen fool

You are the fool,you are proving it with every post,keep it up

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Hollywood is such a huge monstrous guy ..I know…

Just admit you were wrong. We'll wait (probably forever)

10 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Bennett isn’t a huge guy either around the same size as Hollywood plus stated he needs to do better getting off blocks… but that is completely different then afraid of contact

No, you are wrong(again) 🤣. Facts don't belong here. The light is not coming on for Phil Amint

55 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You want a guy standing still to catch a player running full speed in a yard?

He was running all the way from the 25

You guys are excusing a disgusting lack of effort from our new defender

1 hour ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You want a guy standing still to catch a player running full speed in a yard?

Standing still because: he was doing nothing

14 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He was running all the way from the 25

AND HE WAS BLOCKED UNTIL MAHOMES WAS A YARD AWAY!!!! …. Go watch the Fing play because clearly you haven’t just going off a stand still photo

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Standing still because: he was doing nothing

Being Blocked are you that dense

14 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You guys are excusing a disgusting lack of effort from our new defender

No I’m not excusing nothing made it clear that he needs to do better disengaging from blocks but that a far cry from what you trying to say he did based off a photo

2 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

No I’m not excusing nothing made it clear that he needs to do better disengaging from blocks but that a far cry from what you trying to say he did based off a photo

2nd game as an Eagle. 2 games to learn a different defense from Fangio. He's supposed to be flawless and HOF bound by now 🤣. Being blocked is no excuse. Neither is the obvious. C'mon man,get with the agenda(sheesh)

Fins knotted up with Buffalo at 14 in Buffalo. Pretty shocking to me. Much better game than I thought. I figured this would be a blow out

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Zero positives about the trade for Jakorian Bennett. You confirmed my point.

No, as is so often the case your obtuseness gets in the way of your thinking. Your point stands or falls on its own merit. What I illuminated about that point is that it is both narrow and negative. Its narrowness can easily be calculated. Those 5 snaps by Bennett represent less than three tenths of one percent of the 1,848 player snaps in the game. Three tenths of one percent is about as statistically insignificant as you can get. The one Mahomes scramble snap represents an even more insignificant less than one tenth of a percent. Those kind of proportions are akin to dancing on the head of a pin.

Your negativity is just as compelling as your choice of a hill to die on is insignificant. The team won, and instead of highlighting some of the factors/performances that contributed to that win, you choose to dance on a pin. If the Eagles had lost and Bennett’s play contributed in a meaningful way to that loss, then your choice of a scapegoat would make some sense. But in the reality of what transpired in the game, you just look stupid.

And it is worth noting that Booker’s stats for Week Two were one tackle and Byron Young’s stats for Week Two were also one tackle but in one quarter as many snaps as Booker had.

9 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I just stated how the Zadaroiuis signing already proving to be a huge boost.

How many posts on that? How many on Bennett. You can count. Your Za’Darius comment was a side salad. Your Bennett comments were roast turkey with all the trimmings, and at least four vegetables.

9 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Better than what Bennett has proven to be. The shortest midget. Rather go with Ringo.

There you go again … Ace Negadelphian. Would you rather have Booker’s one tackle on 40+ snaps or Young’s one tackle on 10 snaps?

9 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s a #HurtsHater post

It wasn’t about Hurts. It was about Howie. Get the wax out of your ears.

7 hours ago, joemas6 said:

It's a Giants fan page ...i think. Whatever they need to make themselves feel better

He’s a Big 10 guy from what I can see. Could be giants too.

According to Maske, the NFL identified the missed call in a training tape for officials that was sent to all 32 teams.

"We want to make sure that we officiate these plays tight and make sure that every aspect of the offensive team is legal and any movement… that's not correct, we want to shut it down as a false start," the NFL told teams in the training tape, per Maske.

13 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Standing still because: he was doing nothing

you have to be a troll, i refuse to believe another eagles fan is this obtuse.

10 hours ago, mattwill said:

There you go again … Ace Negadelphian. Would you rather have Booker’s one tackle on 40+ snaps or Young’s one tackle on 10 snaps?

Booker wasn't playing here. We are more than fine at DT. We need CB help. Whether Bennett is that help, remains to be seen... but everyone should agree the idea of trading a DT that wasn't going to play vs a possible help at CB was a good one. The specific hit or miss is always on the player himself.

Btw....im not looking for Bennett to play run defense. If he has to make a tackle down field we have bigger issues.

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

According to Maske, the NFL identified the missed call in a training tape for officials that was sent to all 32 teams.

"We want to make sure that we officiate these plays tight and make sure that every aspect of the offensive team is legal and any movement… that's not correct, we want to shut it down as a false start," the NFL told teams in the training tape, per Maske.

Hopefully just as much attention to neutral zone infractions.

38 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Hopefully just as much attention to neutral zone infractions.

Likely not this will just end up leading to the tush push being banned at the end of the year….likely make it damn near impossible for us to run the play this year as well sure they will be flagging us for every tiny thing

21 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Likely not this will just end up leading to the tush push being banned at the end of the year….likely make it damn near impossible for us to run the play this year as well sure they will be flagging us for every tiny thing

I said before it's a little frustrating that we can't go 10 yards in 3 plays. We had like 6 or 7 tush pushes. IDK to me it's a more effective QB sneak. SO how does one define when a QB sneak becomes a tush push. You would have to penalize guys for "running into" your own guys LOL

40 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO how does one define when a QB sneak becomes a tush push

The push from behind go watch old QB sneaks they didn’t have two players directly behind the QB pushing him forward….

Granted the results we nearly identical we were still like a 90% success rate team with the QB sneak before the push so not much changes…. Just gives the D a slightly better chances at stopping it

47 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

The push from behind go watch old QB sneaks they didn’t have two players directly behind the QB pushing him forward….

Granted the results we nearly identical we were still like a 90% success rate team with the QB sneak before the push so not much changes…. Just gives the D a slightly better chances at stopping it

Right, so the refs would have to flag "running into your own teammate" or "pushing your own teammate" as the foul. It would have to be a new infraction IMO. Bubble ball by 2029