2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

If they run it 35 times I’m already assuming we are toast

So then it's more important that we can stop their run first. Higher on priority list correct?

12 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

@cunninghamtheman answer the question

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

All this is a testament to how I stated this is a very needed move and test for GB by their GM. Have to put everything together to realize if LaFleur and Love will ever be good enough…not to win the most weak twos. To become CHAMPIONS!!!

I thought you said LaFleur was a great O mind. 7 points in 60 minutes

Just now, capmaster24 said:

I don't think you comprehend. I understand it could potentially be an issue, my question remains why do you think it's the most important issue. IDK, I could parallel like why would flowers be the most important thing at a wedding and not some actual real issue?

Yeah…thinking way too high of yourself to ever have even considered thinking…much less typing… I don’t comprehend. You already laid out a/some judgement thoughts about me. I suggest you wet your toes and just tread lighter. Stay awhile to be qualified to attempt to do such. I welcome you to join and contribute all you wish. It’s up to you as much as me the amounts of quality discussion occur. Play your role…if it’s discussing and adding to? Or are you just an addition to creating the issue you throw my direction?

50 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So instead of dodge and deflect…your complaint more surrounds the simple situation of my very specific and thorough well thought out answers are what it actually it takes to answer such questions at times. Sorry things are often just not that simple/cut and dry.

LMFAO. You can't answer a point blank question

49 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

YOU..as much as anyone..should fully volunteer and understand just how incredibly consistent I’ve been about this. Not for a day…not a week…not just recently at all….BEEN CONSISTENTLY TELLING YOU THESE SAME THOUGHTS THE ENTIRE TIME.

LMAO you whiffed on 2 conversations we were having. Totally went off the rails(on the Crazy Train) You consistently talk to yourself trying to convince yourself you are right,it's fun to watch

12 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Against our zone defense, 3 short passes to Gibbs is the biggest issue?

First of all…do you believe Fangio deploys a Zone coverage against Detroit? I really not nearly as sure. Seems like we would matchup man on them preferably much more. We really need to have Q on Sun God. Nothing but trouble if we allow them to just move and create Amon matchups versus Adoore. Goes right down the line as how our D is built. Now this is almost 2026 NFL…very common to have man and coverage duties all in one playcall. Simplfied example: Q in Man while other side Zone.

50 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My daughter is in fourth grade…it’s not nearly the insult you remember it as being. They are light years ahead by fourth grade of way back when.

She's light years ahead of you already. She can probably answer questions she is asked. She needs to teach you the ropes

Man big issue is if you don’t have a stud CB to take on St Brown. Also Man is susceptible to DBs backs turned away allowing the rushing QB. Not the big issue facing Detroit and Goff.

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMFAO. You can't answer a point blank question

This is your contribution..look in the mirror

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Luckily for me you are the opposite of being my boss…but I attempted to educate you. Give the man a fish he won’t be hungry. Teach him how to fish he’ll never starve…that type thinking. I gifted you the entire source to educate yourself on so much more than just about this one tidbit.

Boss, as in a community elder. Everyone on these boards qualifies as elders in this community, so give them the respect they deserve, and make their job easier rather than put obstacles in their way.

Common courtesy, taught to children by their parents at a young age.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

She's light years ahead of you already. She can probably answer questions she is asked. She needs to teach you the ropes

One can only hope

41 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

My other question would be why do you act like such a d#$k? I see people on here having a discussion and giving opinions and not necessarily agreeing all the time. But seems only you act like a total dooosh about things? Are there personal issues we don't know about? Issues that might cause you to need attention? Just curious, because this is supposed to be a site where we all get to talk about our favorite team, one would think that should bring positive vibes, especially with the success in recent years with Howie, Sirianni and co?

They suck. Get on board

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Maybe this was the role BVS would fill. IDK just tossing that out for discussion

That is a good thought, but a FB would be leading the RB rather than trailing him ... acting as a battering ram rather than cleaning up the trash. A TE motioning across the LOS going from the play side to the weak side not only creates some misdirection the D has to react to, but can be perfectly positioned to clean up the trash caused bu the Guard (or Tackle) pulling.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Boss, as in a community elder. Everyone on these boards qualifies as elders in this community, so give them the respect they deserve, and make their job easier rather than put obstacles in their way.

Common courtesy, taught to children by their parents at a young age.

Elder…doesn’t equal boss…or wisdom…sorry you never were taught that. I judge you on the very simple proven method of basing it on what you earned. I’m not age-ist at all. I treat all equally free as possible of preconceived judgements.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I supply it all…call it like I see them. Everybody should back me up on this point. You definitely get my two cents on each move.

We get your two Denarius worth.

32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But it’s so very effective weapon…don’t underestimate the damage sporty Gibbs can do getting the ball in his hands(especially out past the huge lineman trapping the backfield)

Why don't we do that with Shipley?

27 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Teams pass…and teams run

Jebus I never knew this, thanks for the info. Just tremendous insight

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Elder…doesn’t equal boss…or wisdom…sorry you never were taught that. I judge you on the very simple proven method of basing it on what you earned. I’m not age-ist at all. I treat all equally free as possible of preconceived judgements.

Indeed. You treat all equally badly.

No manners and no shame.

10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This is your contribution..look in the mirror

I did and I can answer point blank questions. Your turn, because you continue to fail at it

26 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Against our zone defense, 3 short passes to Gibbs is the biggest issue?

In all its varying forms it’s a big issue. Flat out from the basic production of just running the play it’s a good weapon. I’m trying to get you to thinking about those next levels of benefits this play effects. Telling you it starts right from Fangio gameplanning for this week. He has to account for this play. Can’t sell out blitzing….unless maybe Fangio has a defender making sure to attack Gibbs not even letting him get out quickly freely in coverage.

How do account for Gibbs each play on coverage? He can come out left, right or center. Really risky packing the box with

a S. My point also is Blankenship would be a terrible matchup against Gibbs for us also. Baun has been balling…but that’s not due to being put in situations alone in space against Gibbs.

8 minutes ago, mattwill said:

We get your two Denarius worth.

See…no matter what or who…can’t be attempted to question whether my two cents has been given on most anything Eagles.

1 hour ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

@cunninghamtheman

who was the one turning the ball over so much in "23?

So Ham what is your answer to taters question?

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why don't we do that with Shipley?

Exactly what my thoughts have been. Actually saw it was even the original plan from the jump with Moore. Saquan’s ultimate season obviously trumped that. Understandable. But it’s such a clear good -to great weapon. Just another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O and one step approach thinking.

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

In all its varying forms it’s a big issue. Flat out from the basic production of just running the play it’s a good weapon. I’m trying to get you to thinking about those next levels of benefits this play effects. Telling you it starts right from Fangio gameplanning for this week. He has to account for this play. Can’t sell out blitzing….unless maybe Fangio has a defender making sure to attack Gibbs not even letting him get out quickly freely in coverage.

Don't you think Fangio knows about this stuff, or are you better at it?