1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly what my thoughts have been. Actually saw it was even the original plan from the jump with Moore. Saquan’s ultimate season obviously trumped that. Understandable. But it’s such a clear good -to great weapon. Just another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O and one step approach thinking.

LOL this is why the guy you hated, GAINS did his job, Now Gains is gone and Ship hasn't stepped up

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O

Or Ship isn't as good as Gains was?? Hurts can't call an audible at the LOS after looking over the defense?

I think Bigsby would be better at this(running inside routes) than Ship

11 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Jebus I never knew this, thanks for the info. Just tremendous insight

How often do you hear how we/they try to make the opponent one dimensional? Then we really T off…go after sack records even a few years back. If you can understand this concept? Then flip the sc

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Don't you think Fangio knows about this stuff, or are you better at it?

Exactly what I’m stating is Fangio is VERY aware. It will effect all phases of Fangio thinking in this matchup. See the production from the play itself? That worth calling it. But that’s just the top of its effect on each game.

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly what my thoughts have been. Actually saw it was even the original plan from the jump with Moore. Saquan’s ultimate season obviously trumped that. Understandable. But it’s such a clear good -to great weapon. Just another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O and one step approach thinking.

I would stop bashing Siri. He's the winningest coach in franchise history and it makes you look stupid

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

How often do you hear how we/they try to make the opponent one dimensional? Then we really T off…go after sack records even a few years back. If you can understand this concept? Then flip the sc

Exactly what I’m stating is Fangio is VERY aware. It will effect all phases of Fangio thinking in this matchup. See the production from the play itself? That worth calling it. But that’s just the top of its effect on each game.

So let Fangio do it. He gets paid to,you don't

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Ham what is your answer to taters question?

Still no answer. Your 4th grader can answer this right now

15 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

How do account for Gibbs each play on coverage? He can come out left, right or center. Really risky packing the box with

a S. My point also is Blankenship would be a terrible matchup against Gibbs for us also. Baun has been balling…but that’s not due to being put in situations alone in space against Gibbs.

Replace the word Gibbs with Barkley and ask Dan Campbell the same question

I suspect DeJean would be involved with Gibbs coming out of the backfield depending where he came out? If he goes right you have DeJean, if he goes left you have Baun? IDK I will let Fangio deal with that.that's why we pay him

13 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Ham what is your answer to taters question?

I did answer it…you just don’t like..can’t comprehend…just can’t get far enough with my logic about the game of football. Team sport where it takes everybody working together as ONE. You both just can’t even still appreciate just how unbelievably incredible our O playmakers were in 2023. They were overcoming the worst O scheme/O system/playcalling accomplishing all they did. They put up stats…which I realize you at least see those.

But doing it with the opponent already knowing your play? Wait a minute…just go back to earlier today when I posted our big D stop. Ojomo read their playcall. If you can’t hear it from me? Listen to Ojomo, our own defender tell you how big an advantage it creates. Listen to Love tell you about it. Listen to Jacobs realizing we read their playcall and how he even tried to go against the rest of his O to avoid the trap.

20 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

See…no matter what or who…can’t be attempted to question whether my two cents has been given on most anything Eagles.

There is no question that you give copiously. The description of what you give is another story. You are a proud follower of the saying, "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Don't you think Fangio knows about this stuff, or are you better at it?

All I’m doing is pointing out exactly what I’d believe Fangio is considering. I believe this one play Fangio specifically ran though how we need to adjust to defend for this matchup right today in practice even.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I did answer it…you just don’t like..can’t comprehend…just can’t get far enough with my logic about the game of football. Team sport where it takes everybody working together as ONE. You both just can’t even still appreciate just how unbelievably incredible our O playmakers were in 2023. They were overcoming the worst O scheme/O system/playcalling accomplishing all they did. They put up stats…which I realize you at least see those.

But doing it with the opponent already knowing your play? Wait a minute…just go back to earlier today when I posted our big D stop. Ojomo read their playcall. If you can’t hear it from me? Listen to Ojomo, our own defender tell you how big an advantage it creates. Listen to Love tell you about it. Listen to Jacobs realizing we read their playcall and how he even tried to go against the rest of his O to avoid the trap.

Totally off the topic question asked. Your words are like the Voynich manuscript and you still refuse to answer the question which is a single word LOL

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

All I’m doing is pointing out exactly what I’d believe Fangio is considering. I believe this one play Fangio specifically ran though how we need to adjust to defend for this matchup right today in practice even.

What is he considering doing?

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL this is why they guy you hated, GAINS did his job, Now Gains is gone and Ship hasn't stepped up

Gainwell was always over-propped up by Siri. Shoved Gainwell in as the better receiving back as a rookie over Sanders. Never will make a dent in accomplishing what Sanders did as a receiving back before Siri took over. Then Siri even propped Gainwell up as the starter to begin the season over Swift. Anybody not so clearly blinded by favoritism knew the talent level wasn’t even questionably debatable between the two. Now Gainwell it was reported had his best TC last season. So him peaking…you could see how that could have held off the rookie Shipley at first…during TC. Look Gainwell was a hard working blue collar RB that was trusted to be in the correct spot dependably. That was his skill. Wasn’t great..even that good at much any of it.

I’m sticking by my thoughts on Shipley. I realize stats haven’t played out proving this yet. But everything else does. Moore had specific personnel packages just to get Shipley on the field week one for the rookie RB. Then every moment and opportunity…he’s come through looking good. I’ve seen it in Shipley…I don’t see any reason to doubt and change my thinking. He’s a quality weapon…get him involved.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Gainwell was always over-propped up by Siri. Shoved Gainwell in as the better receiving back as a rookie over Sanders. Never will make a dent in accomplishing what Sanders did as a receiving back before Siri took over. Then Siri even propped Gainwell up as the starter to begin the season over Swift. Anybody not so clearly blinded by favoritism knew the talent level wasn’t even questionably debatable between the two. Now Gainwell it was reported had his best TC last season. So him peaking…you could see how that could have held off the rookie Shipley at first…during TC. Look Gainwell was a hard working blue collar RB that was trusted to be in the correct spot dependably. That was his skill. Wasn’t great..even that good at much any of it.

LMFAO-Whoomp there it is. Gains started a game OMG!!!!!!! Where is Henny Penny? Sanders, that "special talent" who was demoted to RB3 when he left

57 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah…thinking way too high of yourself to ever have even considered thinking…much less typing… I don’t comprehend. You already laid out a/some judgement thoughts about me. I suggest you wet your toes and just tread lighter. Stay awhile to be qualified to attempt to do such. I welcome you to join and contribute all you wish. It’s up to you as much as me the amounts of quality discussion occur. Play your role…if it’s discussing and adding to? Or are you just an addition to creating the issue you throw my direction?

So again, why are 3 passes to Gibbs THEE #1 key thing in the game? Why is it NUMERO UNO The MOST Important thing. And not just one of the things or an additional thing? Why is it the most? Just a question why for you it is #1 priority? Are we toast on 3 passes to Gibbs like we would be on 35 runs?

6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m sticking by my thoughts on Shipley. I realize stats haven’t played out proving this yet. But everything else does. Moore had specific personnel packages just to get Shipley on the field week one for the rookie RB. Then every moment and opportunity…he’s come through looking good. I’ve seen it in Shipley…I don’t see any reason to doubt and change my thinking. He’s a quality weapon…get him involved.

But we need to draft RB next year even though we have Barkley, Tank and Shipley?

6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m sticking by my thoughts on Shipley. I realize stats haven’t played out proving this yet. But everything else does. Moore had specific personnel packages just to get Shipley on the field week one for the rookie RB. Then every moment and opportunity…he’s come through looking good. I’ve seen it in Shipley…I don’t see any reason to doubt and change my thinking. He’s a quality weapon…get him involved.

I would put Bigsby in that role

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMFAO. You can't answer a point blank question

Why is that< he never answers a question so we can move on , instead keeping the conversation going in a circle???

Just now, capmaster24 said:

9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Gainwell was a hard working blue collar RB that was trusted to be in the correct spot dependably. And this is a bad thing?

58 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

First of all…do you believe Fangio deploys a Zone coverage against Detroit? I really not nearly as sure. Seems like we would matchup man on them preferably much more. We really need to have Q on Sun God. Nothing but trouble if we allow them to just move and create Amon matchups versus Adoore. Goes right down the line as how our D is built. Now this is almost 2026 NFL…very common to have man and coverage duties all in one playcall. Simplfied example: Q in Man while other side Zone.

Has this been what Fangio has done all year?

2 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Why is that< he never answers a question so we can move on , instead keeping the conversation going in a circle???

IDK totally whiffed on the WR conversation about TB LOL Went another direction

I would keep Bark,Tank and Ship, Dump Dillon after this year and bring back my boy MJ on the PS