January 11Jan 11 Author 3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:He is injured doesn’t effect our roster spot either way and the Eagles tend to take care of players so not odd we haven’t waived him while hurtBut no sense keeping him around if there is no plan for him
January 11Jan 11 Author 3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:Also not saying BVS won’t be back and have an opportunity to compete but the injury bug is has hit him twice nowMaybe wrong, but IMO BVS could make a nice TE2 if we'd work with him. We're already using Geodert as a FB(TD1). BVS has the build for a TE2 IMO
January 11Jan 11 7 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:I’ve said it numerous times don’t think KP has been horrible has had rough stretches but see him like a rookie QB first ever year calling plays.Question is do we take the time to develop him? If make a run can’t fire him can we? If we are 1 and done do we look at a Mcdaniels?We’ve been developing him for years failing. It’s now or never.
January 11Jan 11 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:We’ve been developing him for years failing. It’s now or never.When has KP ever called plays? He had a job on this team sure but when has he ever called plays for us? You don’t get that experience until you do it so this just just a stupid comment…Like saying Hurts shouldn’t have been ass as a rookie since he sat on the bench developing for 12+ weeks
January 11Jan 11 6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:But no sense keeping him around if there is no plan for himIt doesn’t effect anything lol the Eagles rarely ever just cut or waive injured player…. What makes them a well liked organization they do tend to take care of players…. BVS is on IR not using a roster spot
January 11Jan 11 Author Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:It doesn’t effect anything lol the Eagles rarely ever just cut or waive injured player…. What makes them a well liked organization they do tend to take care of players…. BVS is on IR not using a roster spotHe will be rostered when he's healthy,so of course it will affect the roster
January 11Jan 11 Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:He will be rostered when he's healthy,so of course it will affect the rosterIf we had no plan to bring him back he should be cut then
January 11Jan 11 Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:He will be rostered when he's healthy,so of course it will affect the rosterHe could be healthy but just not activated
January 11Jan 11 4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:If we had no plan to bring him back he should be cut thenWhy? We can easily cut him when he is healthy in the offseason moving him now effects Nothing…. We also have a 90 man roster to fill out so it’s is highly likely we will bring him back to compete just like we will likely bring back Elliott but he needs to compete for his job next offseason
January 11Jan 11 6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:If we had no plan to bring him back he should be cut thenKeep all your options you can
January 11Jan 11 Author 2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:Why? We can easily cut him when he is healthy in the offseason moving him now effects Nothing…. We also have a 90 man roster to fill out so it’s is highly likely we will bring him back to compete just like we will likely bring back Elliott but he needs to compete for his job next offseasonSure,but why keep a guy around if you have no plans to use him later??? I'm well aware it doesn't affect the roster NOW,but it's pointless to keep him around if you are planning to cut him anyhow. What other FB will compete with him for the FB job?
January 11Jan 11 Author Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:Damn it Saquon WIDE OPEN drop must be KP faultHad to be
January 11Jan 11 1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:Damn it Saquon WIDE OPEN drop must be KP faultConsistent struggle Saquan always possessed
January 11Jan 11 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:Sure,but why keep a guy around if you have no plans to use him later??? I'm well aware it doesn't affect the roster NOW,but it's pointless to keep him around if you are planning to cut him anyhow. What other FB will compete with him for the FB job?Because we going to need bodies to fill out our roster again he will likely compete for a job but I think he is far from a lock like he was this year
January 11Jan 11 Author Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:Because we going to need bodies to fill out our roster again he will likely compete for a job but I think he is far from a lock like he was this yearOnce again there is no competition at FB. I think we had some designed plays for him. It's his job,there is no competition for it unless we draft another FB
January 11Jan 11 In my mind if you are even going to keep a FB on the roster…part of that job is being super durable.
January 11Jan 11 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:Once again there is no competition at FB. I think we had some designed plays for him. It's his job,there is no competition for it unless we draft another FBLatu seems like legitimate competition at FB or in that similar role while also giving us a 3rd TE option and that doesn’t count for if we add anyone else in the offseason or if we even look to use a FB moving forward so many variables
January 11Jan 11 Author 1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:Latu seems like legitimate competition at FB or in that similar role while also giving us a 3rd TE option and that doesn’t count for if we add anyone else in the offseason or if we even look to use a FB moving forward so many variablesWhy I think it's odd we don't try BVS as a TE. A few more pounds and he's there
January 11Jan 11 We had designs for a FB this season. Believe that’s been a factor with the break through for Goedert. He benefitted with the forced adjustment.
Create an account or sign in to comment