2 hours ago, RememberTheKoy said:

Bucs it is in round 2

 

Garoppolo isn’t chopped liver.

2 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

No, just that he’s currently in the protocol. Which makes sense anyway because he clearly wasn't cleared last Sunday and Sirianni said he was giving the players Monday and Tuesday off. 

And Wednesday is a walk through

15 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Michigan showed both Tennessee and Oregon how to beat this team and it's not single high safety 

Can't speak for Tennessee but Oregons defense was up and down all year.  They just gave up 40 plus to Penn St.  They've been struggling and it's terrible timing as Ohio St is clicking on offense.  

The rest of the teams left, Texas, Penn St, ND and Georgia all have good defenses.  I don't see Ohio St scoring this easily against any of them.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Garoppolo isn’t chopped liver.

I’m just guessing but i doubt Williams, nacua and kupp are playing. 

2 hours ago, Cheesteakitis said:

So he won’t clear protocol for this week either? 

We don’t know if he will or won’t … it’s a puzzlement.

10 minutes ago, Saltpeter said:

ON 32 CARRIES ARE YOU THAT DENSE

 

Is the Colts offensive line as good as the Eagles offensive line?

The Eagles benching Saquon is a travesty. The idea that sitting him and the starters and winning the SB are mutually exclusive is so flawed. Not to mention that with the opponent they have Saquon would almost definitely break an all time NFL record that has stood for like 40 years.  Screw Sirianni and anyone else who was involved in this decision.

1 hour ago, Iggles_Phan said:

That's a weird question.  The Lions didn't have a losing record every year with Sanders OR Johnson.

They made the playoffs 6 times in Barry's 10 seasons.
They made the playoffs 2 times in Calvin's 9 seasons.

You are correct, but you are letting facts get in the way of an either/or binary question.

with that said, do you remember the Andy Reid era of Eagles seasons with pleasure or pain?

1 hour ago, Iggles_Phan said:

That's a weird question.  The Lions didn't have a losing record every year with Sanders OR Johnson.

They made the playoffs 6 times in Barry's 10 seasons.
They made the playoffs 2 times in Calvin's 9 seasons.

Sanders was 5 out of 10

 

 

1 minute ago, DaEagles4Life said:

 

 

Idaho 10’s

 

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Sanders was 5 out of 10

You are right.  I thought he was on the 1999 team.  He was not.

15 minutes ago, T-1000 said:

The Eagles benching Saquon is a travesty. The idea that sitting him and the starters and winning the SB are mutually exclusive is so flawed. Not to mention that with the opponent they have Saquon would almost definitely break an all time NFL record that has stood for like 40 years.  Screw Sirianni and anyone else who was involved in this decision.

No one said they are mutually exclusive.  Rest helps win a SB.  If it didn't help, the 1 seed wouldn't be rewarded with a bye.  Injuries to key players are devastating.  Marginally reducing that risk helps too.

Valuing that help over a frivolous record with no impact on winning the SB was a decision they made...IMO, a very good one.

 

 

1 hour ago, DeathByEagle said:

Point 3- just because they sit Barkley and all the starters doesn't mean they will win the Super bowl.

People need to stop saying Super Bowl over rushing record because it's not guaranteed whether he played or sat. 

No one has said that. 

Sugar Bowl is gonna be at 4pm. Ain’t that some crap.

17 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

 

i bet dickerson would trade rushing title for a ring , just sayin

4 minutes ago, just relax said:

No one has said that. 

There have been plenty of posts suggesting it's one option or the other

32 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

 

 

I promise you we have ones that are way hotter 😂

1 hour ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Saquon looks like a guy telling the press that he just had to put his dog down.

Well, had he been told this was how it was going to go maybe he would have pushed to stay in last week. This may be the right decision, but I dont believe it was handled in the best way. 

I saw the speculation from that dummy Pauline saying Jets should pursue Howie as their new GM

hilarious

1 hour ago, T-1000 said:

The Eagles benching Saquon is a travesty. The idea that sitting him and the starters and winning the SB are mutually exclusive is so flawed. Not to mention that with the opponent they have Saquon would almost definitely break an all time NFL record that has stood for like 40 years.  Screw Sirianni and anyone else who was involved in this decision.

Such an uneducated ridiculous take. You think all these banged up OL and heavily used Saquon wouldn’t benefit from having a bye to heal and recharge for the playoffs?  Thanks for helping me laugh myself to sleep tonight!

10 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

I saw the speculation from that dummy Pauline saying Jets should pursue Howie as their new GM

hilarious

yeah. You can receive a package of 100 consecutive 1st round picks, and the next GM could come in here and screw all of them up. There is no replacing a GM like Howie. Untouchable. 

10 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

I saw the speculation from that dummy Pauline saying Jets should pursue Howie as their new GM

hilarious

They should pursue him.  He should also rebuff them.  And then Lurie should have pizzas delivered to the owner's home at all hours of the night and crank call them.