The percentage tracker has updated to 58% chance Eagles play Washington 42% chance Eagles play Packers. Down slightly from in the 60's earlier today.

But these percentages are just made up and never mean anything.

1 minute ago, pisceschica said:

I can't see WAS winning in detroit or minny

 

They will be playing the Rams or Bucs, likely Rams.

Which if Eagles can find a way to get past the Packers is a good thing because then they'd lamd the Rams in the Divisional Round instead of Vikings/Lions.

Idc who they play in the first round. They have had the best defense majority of year and the best RB. They shouldn’t lose to any wildcard team. Beat whoever is in front or you and go win a championship 

3 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

Packers @ Eagles is going to be a Saturday Night Game.  

Doubt it

1 minute ago, pisceschica said:

I can't see WAS winning in la

Idk the rams offense outside of the bills game has been pretty bleh the last 6 weeks. 

they've scored 20 (garbage time TD vs. eagles), 21, 44, 12, 19 and 13. 

8 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

Yikes, gotta Packera now. Not good.

Don’t be afraid. Your QRB1 can do anything!! 
jk. GB is a very winnable game. Love will throw 3 ints and that defense will sit in soft cover 4 zone coverage all game. It’ll be a walk in the park 

Just now, RememberTheKoy said:

 

They will be playing the Rams or Bucs, likely Rams.

Which if Eagles can find a way to get past the Packers is a good thing because then they'd lamd the Rams in the Divisional Round instead of Vikings/Lions.

i corrected my post..if they stay #6 and rams stay #3 then they go to LA

AJ Terrell is some corner, completely shut down Terry. 

5 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Yeah I don’t understand being scared of these teams. 

Any of them. Not even scared of Minnesota. If Detroit can get halfway healthy, they are the only team that can stop us I believe. Them and the Bills in the SB possibly 

1 minute ago, Sack that QB said:

The percentage tracker has updated to 58% chance Eagles play Washington 42% chance Eagles play Packers. Down slightly from in the 60's earlier today.

But these percentages are just made up and never mean anything.

It's simple, if Washington bears the Cowboys then we play the Packers. If they lose and Packers beat the Bears we play the Redskins.

So we are playing the Packers because Redskins aren't losing to a Cowboys team that has thrown in the towel on the season.

I'm not afraid of any team, Eagles are their own worst enemy just have to play their game.

6 minutes ago, greendestiny27 said:

Only way that happens is if Daniels isn't playing 

Gonna eventually run into a defense that’s not going to allow him to run this much. To me this game was lost as soon as Morris made no adjustment to Daniels being a runner in the second half. I said this last week if you allow him to start being a runner it makes his weapons more dangerous. If you keep him inside the pocket is when he tends to have turnovers 7 in last 6 games and it makes his weapons more manageable. It’s when he runs and gets outside the pocket that makes the commanders weapons tough to defend. 

1 minute ago, NOTW said:

I'm not afraid of any team, Eagles are their own worst enemy just have to play their game.

Exactly, nothing is a given 

2 minutes ago, greendestiny27 said:

AJ Terrell is some corner, completely shut down Terry. 

Good at covering. Awful at tackling tonight. 

Looking at the updated draft board, I think Tennessee is going to want to take Sanders but Daddy is gonna say absolutely not. Should be interesting. 

3 minutes ago, Uscg-green said:

Any of them. Not even scared of Minnesota. If Detroit can get halfway healthy, they are the only team that can stop us I believe. Them and the Bills in the SB possibly 

Yeah the matchup draw is a loser debate. Eagles have the best roster in the NFC, send whoever our way

6 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

The percentage tracker has updated to 58% chance Eagles play Washington 42% chance Eagles play Packers. Down slightly from in the 60's earlier today.

But these percentages are just made up and never mean anything.

Just ran the simulator and only way we play Washington is if they lose to Cowboys I think 

7 minutes ago, Uscg-green said:

I don't think saying you don't really like someone anymore is "slander". Now calling him a POS or something sure. He plays for a team I despise. So I don't really like him anymore. 

Didn’t mean the slander part to you specifically. I just saw it around on social media recently with the whole Sirianni/Ertz story the past week. He was a big reason for winning the SB.

I’ll always like him for what he did. Especially when nothing of importance is against the Eagles and to quote Nick Sirianni, he didn’t even do anything in their win.

I’m more scared of Barkley not being appropriately rested than I am of any NFC team, Lions included.  If they trot out Barkley and the first string OL next week, they are going nowhere and they don’t deserve to.  Rest matters when you have a dinged up OL and a RB with a massive workload and when your entire chances of a deep run rest on their shoulders.

Just now, Texas Eagle said:

Just ran the simulator and only way we play Washington is if they lose to Cowboys I think 

Curious if Washington would rather play the seeding game or just rest their starters ahead of playoffs. Same with GB. They probably would prefer the week of rest as opposed to "play the Eagles or Rams” 

4 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Curious if Washington would rather play the seeding game or just rest their starters ahead of playoffs. Same with GB. They probably would prefer the week of rest as opposed to "play the Eagles or Rams” 

Resting would make more sense..but if I was WAS id' rather face nfcw winner which means they need to win or gb lose to bears (not happening 😂).

2 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Curious if Washington would rather play the seeding game or just rest their starters ahead of playoffs. Same with GB. They probably would prefer the week of rest as opposed to "play the Eagles or Rams” 

I’d say they’d probably rather face the Rams and get rest also

Edit nvm it’s late that doesn’t work

Just now, Dwide Schrude said:

Curious if Washington would rather play the seeding game or just rest their starters ahead of playoffs. Same with GB. They probably would prefer the week of rest as opposed to "play the Eagles or Rams” 

I’m guessing Gb or commanders would love to go to La as big amount of packers and commanders fans there. Tbh commanders had their bye week in week 14 so really they probably don’t need the rest/bye as much as Gb who had theirs in week 10.  

GB has been a better team all year that Washington, they are not gonna finish behind them. In the end, things end up how they're supposed to end up.

But ultimately I really don't care I just wanted a fun Rams/Seahawks matchup in week 18 and Atlanta ruined it. And Atlanta still can win the NFC South even though I think they're very clearly not as good as the Bucs yet are 2-0 against them this season. Mainly because Bucs played them when they were all banged up.