18 hours ago, vikas83 said:

It's that the other teams may all have worse issues. Minnesota has an oompa loompa playing QB. SF has injuries everywhere and a terrible gameday coach. Chicago has a mama's boy for a QB. Rams have injuries and the QB looks old. Sam Darnold remembered he's Sam Darnold. And me and you could score on the Detroit defense.

The NFC is wide open right now.

On the bold I 100% agree, and you make a good argument against the other teams, but I just don't trust GB the most. I think even with having a mama's boy for QB, the bears are the team I'd put money on to rep the NFC.

At least the Playoffs will be interesting to see

4 hours ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

I’m absolutely convinced they are going to bring back Nick next year. I think they’ll fire Mannion and Kuper but bring back Nick. They seem to fail to see that the reason the offense stinks is because the HC can’t run an offense.

The only reason I feel they will bring back Nick is because the FO can control him with ease. He does not push back, he seen what happen to Doug when he did. Nick knows he is the puppet BUT for that pay check, I'm sure most would be happy to just enjoy the ride.

Will not be easy finding a good prospect HC and keeping all control like they currently have with Nick

41 minutes ago, DeathByEagle said:

The only reason I feel they will bring back Nick is because the FO can control him with ease. He does not push back, he seen what happen to Doug when he did. Nick knows he is the puppet BUT for that pay check, I'm sure most would be happy to just enjoy the ride.

Will not be easy finding a good prospect HC and keeping all control like they currently have with Nick

Yeah I can’t blame Sirianni! He’s taking a very nice pay check for essentially just taking responsibility for the on field issues.

One change I would make if I were Sirianni…

This team has a massive number of players that don’t practice all week. The coaches are falling on the sword for all these Sunday mistakes. Everyone is calling it bad coaching left and right.

The guys playing on Sunday, in large part, aren’t getting coached during the week. That’s probably a huge part of Vic Fangio’s rant about Greenard.

So maybe it’s not all bad coaching…some of it may be no coaching at all.

The injuries are real, but they are so widespread they need to try to put a cohesive team on the field. Sirianni should tell the team…if you aren’t a full participant in at least 2 practices during the week, you aren’t starting Sunday.

9 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

One change I would make if I were Sirianni…

This team has a massive number of players that don’t practice all week. The coaches are falling on the sword for all these Sunday mistakes. Everyone is calling it bad coaching left and right.

The guys playing on Sunday, in large part, aren’t getting coached during the week. That’s probably a huge part of Vic Fangio’s rant about Greenard.

So maybe it’s not all bad coaching…some of it may be no coaching at all.

The injuries are real, but they are so widespread they need to try to put a cohesive team on the field. Sirianni should tell the team…if you aren’t a full participant in at least 2 practices during the week, you aren’t starting Sunday.

Ok well then we better have some guys ready to play both ways. Maybe sticking Davis at guard wouldn’t be horrible… or maybe Mundt’s true calling is as a pass rusher.